CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 10 décembre 1992

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                            AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF                         Application No. 21027/92                       by Zdenek RICHTER                       against Czechoslovakia           The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 10 December 1992, the following members being present:              MM.    C.A. NØRGAARD, President                  S. TRECHSEL                  F. ERMACORA                  G. SPERDUTI                  E. BUSUTTIL                  G. JÖRUNDSSON                  A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                  A. WEITZEL                  J.-C. SOYER                  H.G. SCHERMERS                  H. DANELIUS            Mrs.   G. H. THUNE            Sir    Basil HALL            MM.    F. MARTINEZ                  C.L. ROZAKIS            Mrs.   J. LIDDY            MM.    J.-C. GEUS                  M.P. PELLONPÄÄ                  B. MARXER                    Mr. H.C. KRÜGER, Secretary to the Commission         Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;         Having regard to the application introduced on 15 July 1991 by Zdenek Richter against Czechoslovakia and registered on 3 December 1992 under file No. 21027/92;         Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;         Having deliberated;         Decides as follows: 21027/92                          - 2 -             The applicant, a citizen of the CSFR born in 1931, is a pensioner residing at Cesky Tesín.         In 1974 while at a clinic, it was discovered that the applicant suffered from diabetes.   However, the applicant was not apparently afforded adequate medical treatment.   The applicant's state of health deteriorated and in 1981 he started receiving an invalidity pension.         In 1984 the applicant unsuccessfully applied to the Ostrava District Court (Okresní soud) for compensation.   His appeal was dismissed by the Ostrava Regional Court (Krajsky soud) on 16 June 1989. The applicant's further complaint of insufficient medical treatment and compensation was dismissed by the Ostrava Regional Court on 26 June 1990.         On 18 February 1992 the applicant filed appeals against these decisions with the Constitutional Court (Ústavní soud).   On 17 June 1992 the Court rejected the appeals on the ground that he had not filed them in time.   According to Section 55 para. 3 of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (Zákon o organizaci Ústavního soudu) an appeal must be filed within 60 days after the decision of the previous instance enters into force.         The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention of the unfairness and the undue length of the proceedings before the various courts.   The applicant also raises complaints under Articles 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 14 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4.         The Commission has examined the applicant's separate complaints as they have been submitted by him.   However, after considering these complaints as a whole, the Commission finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention.         It follows that the application is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 of the Convention.           For these reasons, the Commission unanimously           DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISSIBLE.     Secretary to the Commission             President of the Commission              (H.C. Krüger)                          (C.A. Nørgaard)