CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 22 mars 2001

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s20FDDAE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA32F7E3F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D726B78 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sBB5E682E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9922FEC8 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA918FEC8 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.4pt } .s588BDBF1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sBED5F98F { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s988562EE { width:30.55pt; display:inline-block } .s6B64E62F { width:203.14pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 32002/96 by Şadiye ÖZSUCU, Abdullah AKSUCU, Mevlüt and Ramazan KOZAT, Mehmet   Ali DERE, Nadir and Fikri AKSUCU, Abdulbari BAYKAL, Ferzende TOKMAN, Nevzat AKSUCU, Ahmet TOPRAK, Mehmet   KOZAT, Kutbettin TOKMAN and Zahit KOZAT against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 22   March 2001 as a Chamber composed of   Mr   C.L. Rozakis , President ,   Mr   A.B. Baka ,   Mr   G. Bonello ,   Mrs   V. Strážnická ,   Mr   P. Lorenzen ,   Mr   M. Fischbach , judges ,   Mr   F. Gölcüklü , ad hoc judge , and Mr E. Fribergh , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application introduced with the European Commission of Human Rights on 22 March 1996 and registered on 21   June   1996, Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND COMPLAINTS The applicants are Turkish nationals living in the Lice district of the province of Diyarbakır (Turkey). They are represented before the Court by Mr   Fethi Gümüş, a lawyer practising in Diyarbakır. In their application the applicants complained that their houses and shops were destroyed as a result of the random and disproportionate gunfire of the security forces in the course of clashes between the latter and PKK militants in Lice. They alleged that their rights guaranteed by Articles 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 17 and 18 of the Convention and Article   1   of Protocol No. 1 had been violated. PROCEDURE Following informal contacts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter. As a result, the Registrar proposed that the applicants withdraw the application on the condition that the Government pay to the applicants the sums stated below free of any taxes which may be applicable and to be converted into Turkish liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment:   No. Application No. Name of the Applicant The Registrar’s proposal: Pounds sterling 1 32002/96 Şadiye ÖZSUCU 10,000 2 32002/96 Abdullah AKSUCU 10,000 3 32002/96 Mevlüt KOZAT 10,000 4 32002/96 Ramazan KOZAT 15,000 5 32002/96 Mehmet Ali DERE 10,000 6 32002/96 Nadir AKSUCU 10,000 7 32002/96 Fikri AKSUCU 10,000 8 32002/96 Abdülbari BAYKAL 10,000 9 32002/96 Ferzende TOKMAN 10,000 10 32002/96 Nevzat AKSUCU 10,000 11 32002/96 Ahmet TOPRAK 10,000 12 32002/96 Mehmet KOZAT 10,000 13 32002/96 Kutbettin TOKMAN 10,000 14 32002/96 Zahit KOZAT 10,000 15 32002/96 Legal expenses to the applicants’ representative Mr GÜMÜŞ 6,000   By letters of 19 January and 2 February 2001 the Government and the applicants respectively agreed to the proposal. THE LAW The Court takes note of the applicants’ withdrawal of the application on the basis of the agreement reached between the parties (Article 37 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention). The Court considers that there is no reason which would justify the continuation of the examination of the application. For these reasons, the Court Decides to disjoin the application from the other 201 Lice applications; Decides to strike the application out of the list.   Erik Fribergh   Christos Rozakis   Registrar   President