CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG5
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 6 septembre 2001
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0906DEC005259299
- Date
- 6 septembre 2001
- Publication
- 6 septembre 2001
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s377C1984 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sEF66EE3D { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; font-size:14pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sBB5E682E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF604F523 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; font-size:14pt } .sA918FEC8 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.4pt } .sBED5F98F { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s988562EE { width:30.55pt; display:inline-block } .s6B64E62F { width:203.14pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 52592/99 by Aniello TEDESCO against Italy The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6   September 2001 as a Chamber composed of   Mr   C.L. Rozakis , President ,   Mr   A.B. Baka ,   Mr   P. Lorenzen ,   Mrs   M. Tsatsa-Nikolovska ,   Mr   E. Levits ,   Mr   A. Kovler,   Mr   V. Zagrebelsky , judges , and   Mr   E. Fribergh , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application introduced on 8 November 1999 and registered on 15 November 1999, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Aniello Tedesco, is a Italian national, born in 1936 and living in Venticano (Avellino). He is represented before the Court by Mr   La   Brocca and Mr Rando, two lawyers practising in Benevento. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. In 1994 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant for damage. By an order of 29 June 1994, served on the applicant on 1   July   1994, the Benevento Magistrate committed the applicant for trial commencing on 8 March 1995 before the S. Giorgio del Sannio (Benevento) Magistrate. By a judgment of 19 May 1999, the S. Giorgio del Sannio Magistrate acquitted the applicant.   THE LAW The applicant’s complaint related to the length of the proceedings. The applicant has now informed the Court of his wish to withdraw the application. In accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court considers that the applicant has lost interest in his application. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention which require the continuation of the examination of the application. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Erik Fribergh   Christos Rozakis   Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 5
- Date
- 6 septembre 2001
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0906DEC005259299
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral