CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 23 octobre 2003

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .s84582066 { width:4.99pt; display:inline-block } .s859E34A4 { width:11.02pt; display:inline-block } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sBB5E682E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF604F523 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; font-size:14pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s701081D1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:left } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s904B6DE9 { height:80pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s59259832 { height:149.3pt } .s6F23989F { height:124.3pt } .sDE044F24 { height:70pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB8BE277E { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:48pt; font-size:14pt } .sAC001F88 { margin-top:48pt; margin-bottom:12pt; font-size:14pt } .s145CCEB3 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sE8EB5753 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s6BBACBD8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sEEE3CE35 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s345F6213 { width:23.34pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sBF0FE613 { width:36pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s160BBE39 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s9671CAED { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s451A1BF5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s377C1984 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA918FEC8 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.4pt } .s588BDBF1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sBED5F98F { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sEF8F76C5 { width:20.87pt; display:inline-block } .s93B30DFA { width:207.46pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left }   THIRD SECTION FINAL DECISION Application no. 43370/98 by Ali BAŞTUĞ and Others against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 23   October 2003 as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   G. Ress , President ,   Mr   I. Cabral Barreto ,   Mr   L. Caflisch ,   Mr   R. Türmen ,   Mr   B. Zupančič ,   Mrs   H.S. Greve ,   Mr   K. Traja, judges , and   Mr   V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 21 July 1998, Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court, Having regard to the partial decision of 23 November 1999, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case submitted by the applicants and the Government on 9   September   2002 and 15 July 2003 respectively, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Ali Baştuğ, Hatice Baştuğ, Sabriye Durmuş, Ayşe Birtekin, Songül Çelen, Ahmet Baştuğ, Sabri Baştuğ, Özkul Baştuğ, Hali Arık, Vasfi Şillet, İbrahim Buluz, Salih Keleş, Mehmet Bozdoğan, Ali Bodur, Mehmet Nuri Bahadırlı, Naci Üzüm, Mehmet İslamoğlu (Kırkbuçuk), Sabri Kocaman, Fatma Korkmaz, Zeliha Korkmaz (Pehlivan), Ergün Korkmaz, Erdal Korkmaz, Mustafa Sıtkı Korkmaz, Nuriye Durna, Tayip Korkmaz, Mehmet Hilmi Korkmaz, Fethiye Kara, Mustafa Kara, Mehmet Kara, Adem Kara, Seher Topçu and Medine Canbolat, are Turkish nationals. They were represented before the Court by Mr A. Akıllıoğlu and Mr A. Aktay, lawyers practising in Ankara. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The General Directorate of National Roads and Highways expropriated plots of land belonging to the applicants in İçel in order to build the Tarsus -İçel - Çukurova - İskenderun Motorway. A committee of experts assessed the value of the plots of land belonging to the applicants and these amounts were paid to them when the expropriation took place. Following the applicants’ requests for increased compensation, the national courts awarded them additional compensation plus an interest at the statutory rate of 30 % per annum. The applicants appealed and the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the first instance court. In the beginning of 1998 the due amounts were paid to the applicants respectively. Details are indicated in the table below:                                       NAMES OF THE APPLICANTS   DATE OF TRANSFER OF TITLE DEED TO THE LAND   DATE OF FINAL DECISION BY COURT OF CASSATION AS REGARDS ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION   AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION (interests and legal costs are not included) (in turkish liras)   DATE OF PAYMENT 1. Ali BAŞTUĞ Hatice BAŞTUĞ Sabriye DURMUŞ Ayşe BİRTEKİN Songül ÇELEN Ahmet BAŞTUĞ Sabri BAŞTUĞ Özkul BAŞTUĞ       13.09.1995         27.01.1997           7.109.224.000           06.02.1998   2. Halil ARIK   Vasfi ŞİLLET   İbrahim BULUZ   Salih KELEŞ   Mehmet BOZDOĞAN   Ali BODUR   Mehmet Nuri BAHADIRLI   Naci ÜZÜM   Mehmet İSLAMOĞLU (Kırkbuçuk) Sabri KOCAMAN         21.09.1995           24.03.1997           18.408.958.000           27.01.1998   3. Fatma KORKMAZ Zeliha KORKMAZ (Pehlivan)   Ergün KORKMAZ   Erdal KORKMAZ Mustafa Sıtkı KORKMAZ Nuriye DURNA Tayip KORKMAZ Mehmet Hilmi KORKMAZ         17.12.1992           08.11.1993                 117.418.870                26.01.1998   4. Fethiye KARA Mustafa KARA    Mehmet KARA Adem KARA Seher TOPÇU     18.03.1992       08.11.1993             200.438.000            26.01.1998   5. Medine CANBOLAT 22.07.1992 24.02.1994       9.562.549 26.02.1998   COMPLAINTS The applicants allege that the rate of interest applied in the calculation of the additional compensation for expropriation was too low. They also complain of the delays in obtaining their compensation. In this regard they invoke Article 1 of Protocol No 1 and Article 6 of the Convention. THE LAW Following informal contacts between the applicant’s and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter. As a result, the Registrar addressed draft declarations to the parties. The Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I declare that the Government of Turkey offer to pay 102,625 (one hundred and two thousand six hundred and twenty-five) euros to Mr Ali Baştuğ, Ms Hatice Baştuğ, Ms Sabriye Durmuş, Ms   Ayşe Birtekin, Ms Songül Çelen, Mr Ahmet Baştuğ, Mr   Sabri Baştuğ, Mr Özkul Baştuğ, Mr Hali Arık, Mr Vasfi Şillet, Mr İbrahim Buluz, Mr   Salih Keleş, Mr Mehmet Bozdoğan, Mr   Ali Bodur, Mr Mehmet Nuri Bahadırlı, Mr   Naci Üzüm, Mr Mehmet İslamoğlu (Kırkbuçuk), Mr Sabri Kocaman, Ms Fatma Korkmaz, Ms Zeliha Korkmaz (Pehlivan), Mr Ergün Korkmaz, Mr Erdal Korkmaz, Mr Mustafa Sıtkı Korkmaz, Ms Nuriye Durna, Mr Tayip Korkmaz, Mr Mehmet Hilmi Korkmaz, Ms Fethiye Kara, Mr Mustafa Kara, Mr Mehmet Kara, Mr Adem Kara, Ms   Seher Topçu and Ms Medine Canbolat [1] with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the application registered under no. 43370/98. This sum shall cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and will be divided up as follows: Mr Ali Baştuğ, Ms Hatice Baştuğ, Ms Sabriye Durmuş, Ms   Ayşe Birtekin, Ms   Songül Çelen, Mr Ahmet Baştuğ, Mr Sabri Baştuğ, Mr Özkul Baştuğ 24,000 EUR Mr Hali Arık, Mr Vasfi Şillet, Mr İbrahim Buluz, Mr Salih Keleş, Mr Mehmet Bozdoğan, Mr   Ali Bodur, Mr Mehmet Nuri Bahadırlı, Mr Naci Üzüm, Mr Mehmet İslamoğlu (Kırkbuçuk), Mr Sabri Kocaman, 55,000 EUR Ms Fatma Korkmaz, Ms Zeliha Korkmaz (Pehlivan), Mr Ergün Korkmaz, Mr Erdal Korkmaz, Mr Mustafa Sıtkı Korkmaz, Ms Nuriye Durna, Mr Tayip Korkmaz, Mr   Mehmet Hilmi Korkmaz   7,600 EUR Ms Fethiye Kara, Mr Mustafa Kara, Mr Mehmet Kara, Mr Adem Kara, Ms Seher Topçu 15,500 EUR Ms Medine Canbolat                525 EUR Furthermore, 51,312.5 EUR (fifty-one thousand three hundred and twelve euros and fifty centimes) of this sum, which corresponds to half of the whole sum agreed upon, will be payable within three months from the date of the decision by the Court. This sum shall be paid in euros to a bank account named by the applicants, free of any taxes and charges that may be applicable. The Government further agree to pay the remaining 51,312.5 EUR (fifty-one thousand three hundred and twelve euros and fifty centimes) within six months following the decision by the Court. This sum shall also be paid in euros to a bank account named by the applicants, free of any taxes and charges that may be applicable. This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. ” The Court received the following declaration from one of the representatives of the applicants: “I note that the Government of Turkey are prepared to pay the sum of 102,625 (one hundred and two thousand six hundred and twenty-five) euros covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs to Mr Ali Baştuğ, Ms Hatice Baştuğ, Ms Sabriye Durmuş, Ms   Ayşe Birtekin, Ms Songül Çelen, Mr Ahmet Baştuğ, Mr Sabri Baştuğ, Mr Özkul Baştuğ, Mr Hali Arık, Mr Vasfi Şillet, Mr İbrahim Buluz, Mr Salih Keleş, Mr Mehmet Bozdoğan, Mr   Ali Bodur, Mr Mehmet Nuri Bahadırlı, Mr Naci Üzüm, Mr   Mehmet İslamoğlu (Kırkbuçuk), Mr Sabri Kocaman, Ms Fatma Korkmaz, Ms   Zeliha Korkmaz (Pehlivan), Mr Ergün Korkmaz, Mr Erdal Korkmaz, Mr Mustafa Sıtkı Korkmaz, Ms Nuriye Durna, Mr Tayip Korkmaz, Mr Mehmet Hilmi Korkmaz, Ms Fethiye Kara, Mr Mustafa Kara, Mr Mehmet Kara, Mr Adem Kara, Ms Seher Topçu and Ms Medine Canbolat with a view to securing a friendly settlement of application no. 43370/98 pending before the Court. This sum will be divided up as follows: Mr Ali Baştuğ, Ms Hatice Baştuğ, Ms Sabriye Durmuş, Ms   Ayşe Birtekin, Ms   Songül Çelen, Mr Ahmet Baştuğ, Mr Sabri Baştuğ, Mr Özkul Baştuğ 24,000 EUR Mr Hali Arık, Mr Vasfi Şillet, Mr İbrahim Buluz, Mr Salih Keleş, Mr Mehmet Bozdoğan, Mr   Ali Bodur, Mr Mehmet Nuri Bahadırlı, Mr Naci Üzüm, Mr Mehmet İslamoğlu (Kırkbuçuk), Mr Sabri Kocaman, 55,000 EUR Ms Fatma Korkmaz, Ms Zeliha Korkmaz (Pehlivan), Mr Ergün Korkmaz, Mr Erdal Korkmaz, Mr Mustafa Sıtkı Korkmaz, Ms Nuriye Durna, Mr Tayip Korkmaz, Mr   Mehmet Hilmi Korkmaz 7,600 EUR Ms Fethiye Kara, Mr Mustafa Kara, Mr Mehmet Kara, Mr Adem Kara, Ms Seher Topçu 15,500 EUR Ms Medine Canbolat                525 EUR I also note that 51,312.5 EUR (fifty-one thousand three hundred and twelve euros and fifty centimes) of this sum, which corresponds to half of the whole sum agreed upon, will be payable within three months from the date of the decision by the Court and the remaining 51,312.5 EUR (fifty-one thousand three hundred and twelve euros and fifty centimes) will be payable within six months from the date of this decision. I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts of this application. I declare that this constitutes a final settlement of the case. This declaration is made in the context of a friendly settlement which the Government and the applicants have reached.”   After informing the Government, the Court took into consideration the applicant’s representative’s request of 9 September 2002 to make corrections to some of the applicants’ names in the above declarations. The Court takes note of the agreement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols and considers that there is no reason which would justify the continuation of the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of the Court). For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to disjoin the applications; Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Vincent Berger   Georg Ress   Registrar   President   [1] Taking into consideration the letter sent by the applicant’s representative on 9   September   2002, the name of some of the applicants, namely Zeliha Korkmaz (Pehlivan) and Adem Kara, have been corrected.