CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 22 janvier 2004

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .s84582066 { width:4.99pt; display:inline-block } .s859E34A4 { width:11.02pt; display:inline-block } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sBB5E682E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF604F523 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; font-size:14pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s39A7D870 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s33141CA1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC4E9E8B1 { height:42.7pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEDC5336B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCBC20640 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s145CCEB3 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sE8EB5753 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s6BBACBD8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sEEE3CE35 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s386C3491 { width:31.24pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sBF0FE613 { width:36pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s1760B042 { width:26.21pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s160BBE39 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s9671CAED { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s451A1BF5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s377C1984 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA918FEC8 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.4pt } .s588BDBF1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sBED5F98F { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sEF8F76C5 { width:20.87pt; display:inline-block } .s93B30DFA { width:207.46pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt }   THIRD SECTION FINAL DECISION Application no. 42776/98 by Yılmaz ALTAY and Others against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 22   January 2004 as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   G. Ress , President ,   Mr   I. Cabral Barreto ,   Mr   L. Caflisch ,   Mr   P. Kūris ,   Mr   R. Türmen ,   Mr   B. Zupančič ,   Mrs   M. Tsatsa-Nikolovska, judges , and   Mr   V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 25 June 1998, Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court, Having regard to the partial decision of 23 November 1999, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case submitted by the applicants and the Government on 9   September   2002 and 11 November 2003 respectively, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The first three applicants Mr Yılmaz Altay, Mr Kamil Yılmaz and Mr   Yılmaz Arkan, are Turkish nationals. The fourth applicant, Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A.Ş., is a Turkish company based in İskenderun, Turkey. The applicants are represented before the Court by Mr   A. Akıllıoğlu, Mr   M. Nerse and Mr A. Aktay, lawyers practising in Ankara. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The General Directorate of National Roads and Highways expropriated plots of land belonging to the applicants in Tarsus in order to build the Tarsus-İçel-Çukurova-İskenderun Motorway. A committee of experts assessed the value of the plots of land belonging to the applicants and these amounts were paid to them when the expropriation took place. Following the applicants’ requests for increased compensation, the national courts awarded them additional compensation plus an interest at the statutory rate of 30 % per annum. The applicants appealed and the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the first instance court. On 31   December   1997 the due amounts were paid to the applicants. Details are indicated in the table below:   NAMES OF THE APPLICANTS DATE OF TRANSFER OF TITLE DEED TO THE LAND DATE OF FINAL DECISION BY COURT OF CASSATION AS REGARDS ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION (interests and legal costs are not included) (in turkish liras) DATE OF PAYMENT 1. Yılmaz ALTAY     Kamil YILMAZ     Yılmaz ARKAN   15.07.1993     20.01.1997       14,226,312,000     08.01.1998   2. Yılmaz ALTAY      Kamil YILMAZ     Yılmaz ARKAN   15.07.1993     27.01.1997       13,138,425,000     08.01.1998   3. Yılmaz ALTAY     Kamil YILMAZ     Yılmaz ARKAN   15.07.1993     03.02.1997       12,584,044,000     27.01.1998   4. Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A.Ş. 15.06.1995 20.01.1997   44,557,220,000 05.01.1998 COMPLAINTS The applicants allege that the rate of interest applied in the calculation of the additional compensation for expropriation was too low. They further complain of the delays in obtaining their compensation. They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article   6 of the Convention. THE LAW Following informal contacts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter. As a result, the Registrar addressed draft declarations to the parties. The Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I declare that the Government of Turkey offer to pay 335,000 (three hundred and thirty-five thousand) euros to Mr Yılmaz Altay, Mr Kamil Yılmaz, Mr Yılmaz Arkan and Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A.Ş. [1] with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the application registered under no. 42776/98. This sum shall cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and will be divided up as follows: Mr Yılmaz Altay, Mr Kamil Yılmaz, Mr Yılmaz Arkan     190,000 EUR Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A. Ş.     145,000 EUR 167,500 (one hundred and sixty-seven thousand five hundred) euros of this sum, which corresponds to half of the whole sum agreed upon, will be payable within three months from the date of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article   37   § 1   a) and c) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This sum shall be paid in euros to a bank account named by the applicants, free of any taxes and charges that may be applicable. The Government further agree to pay the remaining 167,500 (one hundred and sixty-seven thousand five hundred) euros within six months following the decision by the Court pursuant to Article   37   §   1 a) and c) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This sum shall also be paid in euros to a bank account named by the applicants, free of any taxes and charges that may be applicable. This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. Ankara, 11 November 2003” The Court received the following declaration signed by one of the representatives of the applicants: “I note that the Government of Turkey are prepared to pay the sum of 335,000 (three hundred and thirty-five thousand) euros covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs to Mr Yılmaz Altay, Mr Kamil Yılmaz, Mr Yılmaz Arkan and Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A.Ş. with a view to securing a friendly settlement of application no. 42776/98 pending before the Court. This sum will be divided up as follows: Mr Yılmaz Altay, Mr Kamil Yılmaz, Mr Yılmaz Arkan     190,000 EUR Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A. Ş.     145,000 EUR I also note that 167,500 (one hundred and sixty-seven thousand five hundred) euros of this sum, which corresponds to half of the whole sum agreed upon, will be payable within three months from the date of the decision by the Court pursuant to Article   37   §   1 a) and c) of the European Convention on Human Rights and the remaining 167,500 (one hundred and sixty-seven thousand five hundred) euros will be payable within six months from the date of this decision. I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts of this application. I declare that this constitutes a final settlement of the case. This declaration is made in the context of a friendly settlement which the Government and the applicants have reached. Mersin, 9 September 2002” After informing the Government, the Court took into consideration the applicants’ representative’s request of 9 September 2002 to include the applicant company’s full name on the above declarations. The Court takes note of the agreement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols and considers that there is no reason which would justify the continuation of the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of the Court). For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to disjoin the application from other applications; Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Vincent Berger   Georg Ress   Registrar   President   [1] Taking into consideration the letter sent by the applicant’s representative on 9   September   2002, the name of one of the applicants, namely Özdemir Gıda Tüketim Ürünleri Dağıtım ve Tic. A.Ş., has been corrected.