CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG5
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 10 juillet 2007
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC001168105
- Date
- 10 juillet 2007
- Publication
- 10 juillet 2007
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s61ED8A2B { width:14.36pt; display:inline-block } .sD5954E93 { width:13.35pt; display:inline-block } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sB8084949 { width:138.49pt; display:inline-block } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5749FA4E { width:31.55pt; display:inline-block } .s3DD50EFA { width:174.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 11681/05 by Gorica VARGA against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 10   July 2007 as a Chamber composed of:   Mrs   F. Tulkens , President ,   Mr   A.B. Baka ,   Mr   I. Cabral Barreto ,   Mr   M. Ugrekhelidze ,   Mr   V. Zagrebelsky ,   Mrs   A. Mularoni ,   Mr   D. Popović, judges , and Mrs   F. Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 March 2005, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together. Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mrs Gorica Varga, is a Serbian national who was born in 1938 and lives in Kula. She was represented before the Court by Mr   S.   Varga, a law professor from Kula. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   S. Carić. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. In 2001 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the heirs of her late husband D.V. seeking acknowledgment of her co-ownership of some of his property. On 14 March 2002 the Kula Municipal Court accepted the applicant’s claim as a whole, awarding her only partial reimbursement of the litigation costs incurred in the proceedings. The applicant appealed against the first-instance judgment in its part concerning litigation costs. Following several remittals of that part of the judgment, the matter was finally decided by the Sombor District Court on 22 February 2007. COMPLAINTS   The applicant originally complained under Article 6   §   1 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings. She further complained under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of an effective remedy in respect of her length complaint and under Article 14 that she has been discriminated against on the basis of her social status. THE LAW By a letter of 21 March 2007, the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant had instructed him to withdraw the application, and on 26 April 2007, the Government proposed that the present case be struck out of the Court’s list of applications. In view of the above and having regard to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, the Court considers that the applicant does not intend to pursue the case. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37   §   1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which would require further examination of the application. Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer be applied and the present case should be struck out of the Court’s list. Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   F. E lens-passos   F. Tulkens Deputy Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 5
- Date
- 10 juillet 2007
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC001168105
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral