CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG — 17 janvier 2008

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sE208486F { font-family:Arial; color:#ff0000 } .s598389FF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:18pt } .sF5E1C6CF { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sC443675D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD2857263 { margin-top:30pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s11869A80 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9F223FEE { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9FBD813A { margin-top:30pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s401C450A { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sE6F6C865 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s988F61DE { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s8C771D24 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:48.75pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s281358E1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s8A9F351B { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sC31874BD { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s25BD2B45 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sC702907E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s1B6AF0FA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF0957490 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7EE1C8F0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s8E011338 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s56E27C8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s804EF768 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sAB173E38 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s31E56244 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s8B3C4997 { width:38.94pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s73DE62FF { width:136.61pt; display:inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block } .s5752D6FA { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-variant:small-caps } .s30F6C862 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:7.1pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-7.1pt; text-align:center } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sCA359B5B { width:124.36%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7CCF64EC { height:78.5pt } .s93F1363B { width:4.24%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sE544FF72 { width:8.5%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sA077823A { width:9.44%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s4A3327D5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sD107E55B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s13887275 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sC23E7F01 { width:13.76%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s5A98E2AF { width:13.64%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s4EFA01ED { width:7.56%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s7700A294 { width:8.48%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s683CAF2B { width:7.54%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s28F342DB { width:9.18%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sDB0041F9 { width:9.16%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sBA9D7445 { width:4.24%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4B97B727 { margin-left:13.34pt; text-align:center; padding-left:1.06pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s501D96FD { width:8.5%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sCB1033A { width:9.44%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s9EC3D246 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s32EBC12B { width:13.76%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s996588D3 { width:13.64%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sD874D8BA { width:7.56%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sCB77E5AE { width:8.48%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sBD49F26C { width:7.54%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s634849ED { width:9.18%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sD5B20510 { width:9.16%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s1A906575 { height:33.75pt } .sDA754500 { height:32.9pt } .sCDB0E8B1 { height:47.7pt } .s1B566575 { height:34.65pt } .sC64A5D7A { height:26.65pt } .s9ECAA7DE { height:8.5pt } .sFAE66575 { height:30.25pt } .sC6AB5D7A { height:26.75pt } .s423F5D7A { height:27.05pt } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s43245D7A { height:27.55pt } .sF5A8E8B1 { height:46.2pt } .s134C0920 { margin-left:14.4pt; text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .sC7072724 { height:9.05pt } .s7F2E4500 { height:39.1pt } .s1A086575 { height:34.85pt } .s31F36575 { height:32.55pt } .sD4796D70 { height:41.45pt } .sA6FC4500 { height:35.7pt } .sECF7D88E { height:64.15pt } .sDD446575 { height:31.55pt } .sEBCD263B { height:28.6pt } .sCD08263B { height:29.6pt } .sFC096575 { height:30.55pt } .sF4046D70 { height:45.35pt } .s318E6D70 { height:47.35pt } .s94FF4627 { height:63.3pt } .s61120776 { height:54.6pt } .s286064EC { height:70.2pt } .sC6034500 { height:34.5pt } .sF33E6D70 { height:40.45pt } .s9FA756B { height:53.55pt } .sAF0CE8B1 { height:44.4pt } .s56AF4627 { height:61.9pt } .s31546575 { height:32.65pt } .sFB856575 { height:30.15pt } .s58F47A41 { margin-left:14.4pt; text-indent:-14.4pt; text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .sFF4BE95E { width:12.79pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF473263B { height:25.1pt } .s5111C6A2 { height:9.6pt } .s4D3D43BA { height:3.85pt } .s5B6FE78A { height:18.4pt } .sFA22F38 { height:36pt } .s39C80776 { height:58.4pt } .s30066575 { height:32.85pt } .s2A7D4500 { height:31.8pt } .sEC96D88E { height:64.05pt } .sB6156D70 { height:46.55pt } .sC58AE089 { height:75.35pt } .s1E9E089 { height:77.85pt } .sEC838919 { height:3.5pt } .sB5A0042E { height:7.4pt } .sC53D4500 { height:34.3pt } .sBDA4E884 { height:85.75pt } .s97E2263B { height:20.3pt } .sCCA5263B { height:29.3pt } .s69B44500 { height:33.5pt } .s60F10776 { height:54.1pt } .sB5306D70 { height:46.05pt } .s7836263B { height:21.8pt } .s174FB0A7 { height:14.75pt } .s794E4542 { height:6.35pt } .s5111C6A7 { height:9.1pt } .sC707265A { height:9.65pt } .s82F30358 { width:4.24%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s5B8E1180 { width:8.5%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s457EFC41 { width:9.44%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s43D205B6 { width:13.76%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s8766BE2C { width:13.64%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s5D2F45E5 { width:7.56%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s8E3788FB { width:8.48%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s540812CD { width:7.54%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s9353F63C { width:9.18%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s643C02AA { width:9.16%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }     FIFTH SECTION     CASE OF LOPATYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE     (903/05 and 120 other applications)       JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG     17 January 2008         FINAL     17/04/2008     This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article   44 §   2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.     In the case of Lopatyuk and Others v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Volodymyr Butkevych,   Margarita Tsatsa-Nikolovska,   Javier Borrego Borrego,   Renate Jaeger,   Mark Villiger, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 11 December 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in 121 applications (see Annex) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 184 Ukrainian nationals (“the applicants”), in December 2004 – May 2005. 2.     The applicants (except Mr M. M. Matveyev) were represented by Mr   G. M. Avramenko, a lawyer practising in the city of Chernigiv, Ukraine.   The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. 3.     On 16 October 2006 the Court decided to communicate the applications to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     All 184 applicants (see Annex) reside in Ukraine. 5.     Between 1997 and 2004 the applicants or their relatives (except Mrs   Y. V. Naumets) instituted separate sets of proceedings in the local domestic courts, seeking the recovery of salary arrears and other payments from the State-owned company “Atomspetsbud” ( Державна будівельно-промислова компанія «Атомспецбуд» ), which carried out construction work at Chernobyl within the zone that had been compulsorily evacuated. The courts found for the litigants and awarded them the amounts claimed; nevertheless, the judgments remained unenforced in full or in major part (see Annex). 6.     By an order of the Ministry of Energy dated 27 June 2002, the debtor company was liquidated and a liquidation commission established. As a result, the State Bailiffs' Service terminated the existing enforcement proceedings and all the writs of enforcement were forwarded to the liquidation commission as creditors' claims. The commission also recognised other debts owed to some of the applicants as creditor's claims [1] . 7.     Furthermore, some of the applicants inherited the judgment awards against the debtor company (see Annex). 8.     The company's liquidation proceedings are still pending. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 9.     The relevant domestic law is summarised in the judgment of Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine (nos.   35091/02 and foll., §§ 24-33, ECHR 2004 ‑ XII). THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 10.     The Court considers that, pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their common factual and legal background. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 11.     The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about lengthy non-enforcement of judgments given in their favour. They also complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they could not recover the debts which were due to them from the State-owned company in accordance with the final decisions of local courts and the decisions of the liquidation commission. These Articles provide, insofar as relevant, as follows: Article 6 § 1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. ...” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law. The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest ...” A.     Admissibility 1.     Applications nos. 6264/05, 9055/05, 19141/05 (in respect of Mr   D.M. Alekseyev) and 20065/05 (in respect of Mrs Y. V. Naumets) 12.     The Court notes that the applicants Mrs T. M. Pobit, Mrs   N.   O.   Funtan and Mr D. M. Alekseyev initiated proceedings before the Court as next-of-kin of the respective judgment creditors, who had died before the applications were introduced. 13.     The Court reiterates that the existence of a victim of a violation, that is to say, an individual who is personally affected by an alleged violation of a Convention right, is indispensable for putting the protection mechanism of the Convention into motion, although this criterion is not to be applied in a rigid, mechanical and inflexible way throughout the proceedings (see Karner v. Austria , 40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003 ‑ IX). Although in Karner   v.   Austria the Court held that a case could be continued after the death of an applicant, and even in the absence of heirs wishing to continue, where the issues transcended the interests of the applicant and raised an important question of public interest relevant to human rights standards in Contracting States, the applicant in that case had died after the introduction of the application before the Convention organs. While it is also true that individuals, who are the next-of-kin of persons who have died in circumstances giving rise to issues under Article 2 of the Convention, may apply as applicants in their own right, this is a particular situation governed by the nature of the violation alleged and considerations of the effective implementation of one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention system ( Fairfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no.   24790/04; see also Georgia Makri and others v. Greece (dec.), no. 5977/03, 24 March 2005). 14.   In the present case the applicants Mrs T. M. Pobit, Mrs N. O. Funtan and Mr D. M. Alekseyev were not parties to any proceedings before the national courts, and the respective judgments creditors died at least two years before the relevant applications were lodged with the Court. Although the applicants were involved in the enforcement proceedings, they acted not as procedural successors of their deceased next-of-kin but in their own right, as owners of the various awards. Given that Article 6 applies to enforcement proceedings because, in the absence of the necessary measures to comply with a final, enforceable judicial decision, Article 6 § 1 can be deprived of all useful effect (see Hornsby v. Greece , judgment of 19 March 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ II, §§ 41, 45), these applicants may not claim to be victims of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention.   As for Mrs   Y.   V.   Naumets, the debt to her was recognised by the liquidation commission and not by the court. There have not therefore been any court proceedings to which the benefit of Article 6 § 1 could attach. She therefore also cannot claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 6 § 1. It follows that these complaints must be rejected as being incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4. 15.     However, Mrs T. M. Pobit, Mrs N. O. Funtan and Mr   D.   M.   Alekseyev were undoubtedly the owners of the respective judgment debts, as they had inherited them in accordance with the ordinary rules on administration of estates. Similarly, Mrs Y.V. Naumets' claim, which was recognised in the course of the liquidation as valid, is also to be considered as an item of property for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. These applicants may therefore claim to be victims of a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. The Court notes that these complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. 2.     All other applications 16.     The parties did not submit any observations in respect of the admissibility any of the cases. 17.     The Court notes that the applications are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 18. The parties did not submit any observations in respect of the merits of the cases in time. 19.     Concerning the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour, the Court notes that they have not been enforced for a considerable period of time (see Annex). 20.     The Court recalls that it has already found violations of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention and Article   1   of Protocol   No.   1 in cases like the present applications (see the Mykhaylenky and Others judgment, cited above, §§ 55 and 64). 21.     The Court further notes that the failure of the debtor, which in the present case is a State enterprise, to pay the applicants creditor's claims recognised by the liquidation commission, likewise constitutes an unjustified interference with their right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions. 22.     There have, accordingly, been violations of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention in respect of the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favours and violations of Article   1   of Protocol   No.   1 in the present applications. III.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 23.     Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” A.     Damage 24.     The applicants claimed different amounts (see Annex) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. The pecuniary damages claimed by the applicants consist of the interest which they would have allegedly received had they placed their money on the deposit accounts in a commercial bank. 25.     The Government maintained that the applicants' claims for pecuniary damage were unsubstantiated. 26.     The Court does not discern any causal link between the violation found and the pecuniary damage alleged; it therefore rejects these claims. The Court, however, notes that it is undisputed that the State still has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments at issue and to pay any additional creditors' claims recognised by the liquidation commission. The Court also makes awards in respect of non-pecuniary damage (see Annex). B.     Costs and expenses 27.     The applicants (except Mr M. M. Matveyev) also claimed 135 euros (EUR) each for costs and expenses. 28.     By letter of 3 August 2007 the applicants' representative submitted additional claims on behalf of Mr O.G. Krasin (5,000 Ukrainian hryvnas (UAH)) [2] , Mrs A. G. Gidzun and Mr V. I. Pushnya (UAH 5,300 each) [3] . These claims are out of time. 29.     The Government maintained that these amounts were manifestly overstated. 30.     According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his/her costs and expenses only insofar as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum. In the present case, regard being had to the information in its possession and the above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 40 to each of the applicants (except Mr   M. M. Matveyev) covering costs for the proceedings before the Court. C.     Default interest 31.     The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Declares inadmissible the complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in applications nos. 6264/05, 9055/05, 19141/05 (in respect of Mr D. M. Alekseyev) and 20065/05 (in respect of Mrs   Y.V.   Naumets);   3.     Declares the remainder of applications admissible;   4.     Holds that there have been violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour in all applications except nos. 6264/05, 9055/05, 19141/05 (in respect of Mr   D. M. Alekseyev) and 20065/05 (in respect of Mrs Y.V. Naumets);   5.     Holds that there have been violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the present applications;   6.     Holds (a)     that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final according to Article   44   §   2 of the Convention, the amounts for non-pecuniary damage as indicated in the Annex and EUR 40 (forty euros) for costs and expenses to each of the applicants except Mr M. M. Matveyev (application no.   6423/05); (b)     that the above amounts shall be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement, plus any tax that may be chargeable; (c)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;   7.     Dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 17 January 2008, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.   Claudia W esterdiek   Peer Lorenzen   Registrar   President     ANNEX   No. Application no.   Date of introduction   Name(s) of the applicant(s) Name of the domestic court and date(s) of its judgment(s) Amount awarded (UAH) Claim recognised by the Liquidation Commission (UAH) Paid amount (UAH) Pecuniary damages claimed (UAH) Non-pecuniary damages claimed (EUR) Just satisfaction award (EUR)   903/05 10/12/2004 LOPATYUK Anatoliy Opanasovych Irpinskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 25/08/1999 6,716 -- -- 23,333.02 3,760 2,000   1033/05 08/12/2004 GIDZUN Alla Georgiyivna Kyivo-Svyatoshynskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 02/10/2002 8,996.21 -- -- 9,037.91 2,240 1,600   1655/05 22/12/2004 1) GORPYNYCH Kostyantyn Mykolayovych Olevskyy District Court of Zhytomyr Region, 19/12/2002 17,052.24 17,088.07 -- 23,607.17 2,640 1,600     22/12/2004 2) FILIPS'KYY Volodymyr Denysovych Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 18/09/2001 20,835.76 -- -- 31,622.79 2,760 2,000     22/12/2004 3) MURAVYOV Yuriy Borysovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 27/04/1999 5,687 5,687 -- 23,141.13 3,920 2,000     22/12/2004 4) MARTYNYUK Petro Dementyovych Dniprovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 15/12/1999 12,869.06 -- 201.95 37,357.46 3,600 2,000     22/12/2004 5) PINCHUK Volodymyr Danylovych Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/03/1998 4,484 4,484.37 230.88 30,098.03 4,440 2,000     22/12/2004 6) PIONTKOVSKYY Mykhaylo Anatoliyovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 22/04/2003 25,696.72 25,202.64 -- 21,182.48 2,000 1,400     22/12/2004 7) DENYSENKO Petro Grygorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/02/1998 4,431 4,445 -- 30,880.25 4,480 2,000     22/12/2004 8) BOGDANOVA Lyudmyla Andriyivna Kyivo-Svyatoshynskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 29/01/2003 25,450.23 22,794.06 -- 23,100.11 2,080 1,400     22/12/2004 9) ZHYTNYY Volodymyr Oleksiyovych Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 19/10/2001 4,941.64 4,104.28 -- 10,423.24 3,200 2,000     22/12/2004 10) GOLICHENKO Victor Makarovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 24/07/2002 3,841.12 3,790.12 -- 4,270.16 2,360 1,800     22/12/2004 11) ONIKIYENKO Mykola Mykolayovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 22/11/2002 13,572.90 13,545.03 -- 13,167.86 2,200 1,600     22/12/2004 12) LAVRINENKO Victor Feodosiyovych Korostyshivskyy District Court of Zhytomyr Region,06/02/2002 9,862.03 -- -- 12,851.11 2,560 1,800     22/12/2004 13) MELNYK Yuriy Mykolayovych Shchorskyy District Court of Chernigiv Region, 11/01/2001 6,126 6,162 -- 11,705.58 3,080 2,000   3648/05 10/12/2004 SHKLYARCHUK Grygoriy Mykhaylovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/04/2001 10,854 10,854.10 -- 19,066.95 2,960 2,000   3652/05 10/12/2004 TOLOCHYN Volodymyr Mykolayovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/04/2001 16,640 16,640.87 -- 29,231.08 2,960 2,000   3679/05 10/12/2004 KROPEVNYTSKYY Mykhaylo Oleksandrovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 16/10/2002 12,215.99 12,215.99 -- 12,272.69 2,240 1,600   3693/05 10/12/2004 DOTSENKO Anatoliy Mykolayovych Bilotserkivskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 18/02/2002 9,098.41 9,098.41 -- 11,856.04 2,560 1,800   3697/05 10/12/2004 DATSENKO Anatoliy Volodymyrovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/11/1997 3,899 3,899 -- 30,520.58 4,600 2,000   3699/05 10/12/2004 ANDROSENKO Mykhaylo Stepanovych Darnitskyy District Court of Kyiv, 26/01/1999 6,117 -- -- 27,934.17 4,040 2,000   3704/05 10/12/2004 SHELOFASTOV Volodymyr Anatoliyovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 20/12/2002 20,461.67 24,092.96 -- 22,557.59 2,160 1,600   4020/05 10/12/2004 KRASIN Oleksandr Grygorovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 21/01/2003 2,385.79 -- -- 2,165.48 2,120 1,600   4024/05 10/12/2004 BARSUK Ivan Petrovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/11/1998 5,278 -- 271.24 25,995.02 4,120 2,000   4030/05 10/12/2004 BRYL Mykhaylo Mykhaylovych Bilotserkivskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 21/11/2000 14,912.78 14,922.99 -- 30,359.46 3,160 2,000   4036/05 10/12/2004 STADNYK Petro Victorovych Slavutytskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 22/10/2001 6,659 6,220.90 -- 9,805.18 2,720 2,000   4041/05 10/12/2004 TOMENKO Lidiya Markivna Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 15/11/1999 6,833.02 6,833.02 -- 21,007.16 3,640 2,000   6206/05 08/12/2004 LYTVYN Mykola Sergiyovych Moskovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 09/10/2000 9,338.82 -- -- 19,698.07 32,000 2,000   6219/05 08/12/2004 YUVKHYMENKO Olga Opanasivna Dniprovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 31/08/2000 8,750 -- -- 21,207.28 3,280 2,600 Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv City, 29/03/2004 2,558.27 -- --   6230/05 08/12/2004 MILOSERDOV Anatoliy Mykhaylovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/09/1997 8,646 -- -- 73,510.84 4,680 2,000   6235/05 08/12/2004 BILKOVSKYY Anatoliy Ivanovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/04/1999 11,064.56 -- 569.75 45,023.12 3,920 2,000   6242/05 08/12/2004 KURACH Oleksandr Grygorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/02/1998 4,799 -- 247.10 33,444.89 4,480 2,000   6264/05 08/02/2005 POBIT Tetyana Mykolayivna Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 14/09/1998 (decision in favour of the applicant's husband deceased in 2002) 4,895 4720.87 175.23 25,120.98 4,160 2,000   6267/05 08/02/2005 ZAYKOVSKYY Anatoliy Anatoliyovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 17/10/1997 9,415 2,646.15 1,014 5,448 1,000 306.85 68,656.54 4,640 2,000   6270/05 08/02/2005 SHEVCHENKO Oleksandr Grygorovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 30/10/2002 11,331.84 2,204.82 9,127.02 -- 11,384.37 2,240 1,600   6273/05 08/02/2005 ZAGORULKO Mykola Illich Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 14/10/1998 4,058 -- 145.26 63.61 20,825.53 4,160 2,000   6275/05 08/02/2005 KOZAK Vitaliy Gustavovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 30/10/2002 13,501.30 13,501.30 -- 13,563.89 2,240 1,600   6278/05 08/12/2004 GRYSHCHENKO Volodymyr Mykhaylovych Podilskyy District Court of Kyiv, 13/07/1998 6,475 13,220.69 -- 42,354.08 4,280 2,000   6282/05 08/02/2005 BEZNOSHCHENKO Fedir Kostyantynovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 13/08/1997 2,357.70 2,216.60 16.70 124.40 20,885.99 4,720 2,000   6284/05 08/02/2005 YEVSTRATENKO Mykola Ivanovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 11/07/2000 10,418.94 10,418.84 -- 24,383.41 3,320 2,000   6290/05 08/02/2005 BIKATS Victor Mykhaylovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 19/02/1999 5,794 5,744 298.34 25,468.14 4,000 2,000   6412/05 08/12/2004 SHOLUDKO Pavlo Stepanovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 18/06/2001 6,882.73 -- -- 11,416.56 2,880 2,000   6423/05 08/12/2004 MATVEYEV Mykhaylo Mykhaylovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 10/10/2002 5,708.65 5,708.65 1,000 No claim No claim No award   6430/05 08/12/2004 KORZH Yuriy Andriyovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 06/11/1997 4,557 4,342.54 234.57 35,671.26 4,600 2,000   6435/05 08/12/2004 IGNATENKO Leonid Dmytrovych Bilotserkivskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 15/06/1998 3,432 -- 122.85 20,559.25 4,320 2,000   6438/05 08/12/2004 GRYGORYEVA Maryna Valentynivna Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 16/10/2002 24,034.48 -- -- 24,034.48 2,240 1,600   6528/05 08/12/2004 SYDORENKO Volodymyr Stepanovych Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 01/07/1998 2,714 -- 401.62 38,310.46 4,280 2,600 Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 15/12/1998 1,788 Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 08/02/1999 2,086 Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 22/11/1999 2,384   6536/05 08/12/2004 MYAGKYY Mykola Ivanovych Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 18/01/2001 13,557.20 13,557.20 -- 33,478.68 3,080 2,600 Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 16/04/2001 5,057.08 5,057.08 --   6540/05 08/12/2004 SOKUR Stanislav Ivanovych Local Court of Vasylkov, Kyiv Region, 18/03/2003 4,507.52 118.24 4,389.28 -- 3,839.01 2,240 1,400   6556/05 08/12/2004 KULPACH Nina Vasylivna Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/09/1997 4,152 -- 213.88 35,290.07 4,680 2,000   6558/05 08/12/2004 LIPCHANKO Yuriy Mikhaylovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv,10/07/2000 10,095 -- -- 23,627.42 3,320 2,000   6559/05 08/12/2004 SYNYANSKYY Ivan Ivanovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/04/1998 6,131 -- 315.68 39,629.40 4,400 2,000   6561/05 08/12/2004 DYKA Tamara Volodymyrivna Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 06/04/2004 12,121.87 12,121.47 -- 6,465.60 1,520 1,000   6569/05 08/12/2004 PAVLENKO Nina Grygorivna Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 07/12/1999 11,191 11,015.38 175.62 33,004.16 3,600 2,000   6572/05 08/12/2004 SMYRNOV Oleksandr Fedorovych Moskovskyy District Court of Kyiv City, 30/03/1998 6,420 -- 330 43,093.08 4,440 2,000   6924/05 08/12/2004 BUNIN Sergiy Ivanovich Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/09/1997 5,431 -- 279.65 46,160.98 4,680 2,000   6943/05 08/12/2004 PUSHNYA Volodymyr Ivanovych Minskyy District Court of Kyiv, 28/04/2001 19,183.32 -- -- 33,698.86 2,960 2,000   6953/05 08/02/2005 BEREZHNOY Mykhaylo Fedorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv,23/07/2001 8,401 -- -- 13,531.56 2,840 2,000   7126/05 08/02/2005 KUSHNIRENKO Valeryy Mykolayovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 21/05/1998 1,692 1,604.89 87.11 10,529.72 4,360 2,000   7139/05 08/02/2005 SHARAPA Mykhaylo Vasylyovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 15/12/1997 5,041.64 -- 182.36 37,843.80 4,520 2,000   9034/05 08/02/2005 AMINOVA Lyubov Sharypivna Radyanskyy District of Kyiv, 01/12/1998 4,360 -- 224.48 19,615.22 4,560 2,000   9042/05 08/02/2005 SYROVATKO Tetyana Pavlivna Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 05/08/2002 6,895.46 6,895.46 -- 7,415.46 2,320 1,600   9055/05 08/02/2005 FUNTAN Nina Oleksandrivna Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 09/08/2000 (in favour of the applicant's husband deceased in 2003) 7,696.56 7,696.56 -- 17,406.37 3,280 2,000   9061/05 08/02/2005 NAZARCHUK Mykola Volodymyrovych Borodyanskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 03/12/2002 16,789.26 5,027 11,762.12 -- 15,681.88 2,160 1,600   9070/05 08/02/2005 ZYATKEVYCH Anatoliy Pylypovych Minskyy District Court of Kyiv, 21/01/1998 6,016 -- 309.74 43,522.81 4,520 2,000   9075/05 08/02/2005 SHYNKARENKO Sergiy Oleksandrovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/09/2002 14,060.27 14,060.27 -- 14,618.70 2,280 1,600   9078/05 08/02/2005 DOLGYKH Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/09/2002 15,401.13 15,401.13 -- 16,012.82 2,280 1,600   9080/05 08/02/2005 YANCHUK Petro Kupriyanovych Trostyanetskyy District Court, 23/11/1998 8,146 3,676.18 8,073.82 1,176.55 419.41 49,329.96 4,600 2,600 Trostyanetskyy District Court, 03/04/2001 5,200   9088/05 08/02/2005 MALTSEV Mykola Yakovych Ochakov Town Local Court, 18/02/2002 8,330.38 7,042.96 1,287.42 -- 10,855.23 2,560 1,800   9090/05 08/02/2005 SOKOLENKO Oleksandr Mykhaylovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 17/05/2001 6,177 6,177.82 -- 10,544.97 2,920 2,000   13040/05 22/02/2005 RYAZANOVA Olga Oleksiyivna Slavutytskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 03/11/1997 4,662 -- 2,137 19,765.18 4,600 2,000   13109/05 22/02/2005 AREFYEVA Tamara Kostyantynivna Desnyanskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 10/01/2003 7,726.98 7,726.98 -- 7,013.46 2,120 1,600   13152/05 22/02/2005 DENISENKO Sergiy Grygorovych Chernigivskyy District Court of Chernigiv Region, 19/12/1997 5,029.40 2,322.40 2,448.03 258.97 37,751.93 4,560 2,000   13163/05 22/02/2005 PINCHUK Mykola Mykolayovych Novozavodskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 24/01/2002 10,069.31 10,069.21 -- 13,527.05 2,600 1,800   13168/05 22/02/2005 MILYAYEV Vladyslav Dmytrovych Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 28/04/2001 17,359 17,359.02 -- 30,594.13 2,960 2,000   13170/05 22/02/2005 FEDORCHAK Oleksandr Fedorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/11/1998 10,895 14,889.25 -- 56,631.06 4,120 2,000   13171/05 22/02/2005 SHAKUN Mykola Petrovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 25/02/1999 11,307 10,283.97 441 583.02 47,142.73 4,000 2,000   13172/05 22/02/2005 DEMYANENKO Mykola Mykolayovych Baryshivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 12/11/1997 1,716 11,202.87 -- 16,328.54 4,600 2,000   13173/05 22/02/2005 BOGDANOV Yuriy Oleksandrovych Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 27/03/2002 16,857.12 12,955.17 3,901.55 -- 21,298.61 2,520 1,800   13174/05 22/02/2005 SHARAPA Vasyl Vasylyovych Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 12/05/1998 3,948 3,719.72 228.28 23,148.71 4,360 2,000   13175/05 22/02/2005 KARPENKO Lidiya Ivanivna Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 14/08/1998 7,145 6,777.09 2,550 367.91 131.29 51,738.83 4,240 2,000 Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 09/12/1998 2,550   13180/05 22/02/2005 OSADCHUK Anatolyy Mykhaylovych Golosiyivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 28/11/2001 16,184.54 13,014.72 2,164.70 -- 31,787.58 3,120 2,000   18040/05 28/03/2005 KONOPLICH Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Svyatoshynskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/06/2003 8,982.11 8,982.11 -- 6,923.44 1,920 1,400   18072/05 28/03/2005 NORYK Vira Vasylivna Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 26/06/1998 2,173 1,961.12 111.88 12,347.05 4,320 2,000   18076/05 28/03/2005 LAVRIYENKO Zinayida Volodymyrivna Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 04/08/1998 1,561 250 1,230.59 80.41 8,659.11 4,240 2,000   18082/05 28/03/2005 TYMOSHENKO Volodymyr Grygorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 27/04/1999 7,323.76 7,324 -- 29,801.32 3,920 2,000   18088/05 28/03/2005 MAKOVSKA Oksana Dmytrivna Borodyanskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 20/09/2002 (in favour of Makovska O.D.) 8,663.27 8,613.27 -- 9,007.35 2,280 1,600       MELNYCHENKO Tamara Mykhaylivna Borodyanskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 08/11/2002 (in favour of Melnychenko T.M) 17,133.37 17,163.51 -- 16,622.08 2,200 1,600   18124/05 28/03/2005 KADELCHUK Volodymyr Volodymyrovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 04/11/1999 5,785 5,776 -- 17,785.17 3,640 2,000   18485/05 28/03/2005 PROKOPENKO Vasyl Ivanovych Darnitskyy District Court of Kyiv, 15/01/1999 3,647 305.67 3,210.79 130.54 16,654.56 4,040 2,000   18499/05 28/03/2005 SHMAGAYLO Polina Georgiyivna AND YULA Ivan Ivanovych Slavutytskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 27/04/2001 3,241 (in favour of Shmagaylo P.G.) -- -- 5,693.38 2,960 2,000 3,247 (in favour of Yula   I.I.) -- -- 5,703.92 2,960 2,000   18513/05 28/03/2005 ZHOVNERCHUK Sergiy Bronislavovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/04/1998 2,440 2,440 -- 15,771.61 4,400 2,000   18514/05 28/03/2005 VLASOVETS Volodymyr Grygorovych Novozavodskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 17/08/1998 5,535 5,251.16 285.01 30,703.51 4,240 2,000   18520/05 28/03/2005 LYUBLINSKA Galyna Petrivna Slavutytskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 05/04/2001 3,411 3,411 -- 5,992.02 2,960 2,000   18558/05 28/03/2005 SVYRYDENKO Valeriy Pavlovych Zaliznychnyy District Court of Kyiv, 18/06/1998 4,707 -- 242.38 28,197.08 4,320 2,000   18630/05 28/03/2005 SHYLAN Grygoriy Oleksiyovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 21/06/2002 1,288.37 1,288.37 -- 1,479.93 2,400 1,800   18631/05 28/03/2005 SOLOSHENKO Oleksandr Borysoviych Bilotserkivskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 16/04/1998 3,987 -- -- 25,771.06 4,400 2,000   18633/05 28/03/2005 TKACH Iryna Arkadiyivna Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 19/06/2002 2,805.61 2,805.61 -- 3,222.77 2,400 1,800   18637/05 28/03/2005 KAMENSKYY Mykhaylo Dmytrovych Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 03/02/1999 7,292 7,292.61 -- 50,818.95 4,480 2,000   18639/05 28/03/2005 SOKOLOVSKYY Victor Stanislavovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 06/11/1997 5,732 5,682 -- 44,868.92 4,600 2,000   18698/05 28/03/2005 SMALKO Oleksiy Yosypovych Boryspilskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 20/07/1999 8,695 8,300.57 394.43 31,441.79 3,800 2,000   18784/05 07/03/2005 YAKOVENKO Stanislav Volodymyrovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/01/1998 6,288 -- -- 43,821.94 4,480 2,000   18873/05 07/03/2005 SYCHEVSKYY Anatoliy Volodymyrovych Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 30/05/2002 9,257.15 9,257.15 -- 10,981.66 2,440 1,800   18879/05 07/03/2005 POKOZATSKYY Volodymyr Mykolayovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 26/11/1998 4,321 3,568.14 752.86 -- 21,321.34 4,120 2,000   18890/05 07/03/2005 GUBSKYY Anatoliy Ivanovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/12/1998 2,988 2,988 -- 14,172.41 4,080 2,000   18897/05 07/03/2005 KOVALENKO Anatoliy Andriyovych Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 09/12/1998 6,991 6,630.72 360.28 33,159.07 4,080 2,000   18901/05 07/03/2005 NESTERCHUK Vasyl Anatoliyovych Ivanivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 14/11/2002 2,698.98 2,698.98 -- 2,618.44 2,200 1,600   18907/05 07/03/2005 NESTERCHUK Petro Anatoliyovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 31/01/2003 5,783.09 -- -- 5,429.07 2,120 1,600   18913/05 07/03/2005 ALEKSEYENKO Andriy Andriyovych Vasylkivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 01/02/2002 11,377 10,185 1,000 -- 10,005.69 2,080 1,800   18940/05 07/03/2005 SHCHERBATENKO Volodymyr Vasylyovych Ovrutskyy District Court of Zhytomyr Region, 25/06/2003 25,528.73 25,528.73 -- 19,682.64 1,920 1,400   18945/05 07/03/2005 BRODICH Vasyl Antonovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 26/02/1998 5,543 -- 284.59 58,343.84 4,480 2,600 Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/06/1998 3,825 -- 203.03   18955/05 07/03/2005 MARTYANOV Volodymyr Yegorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 25/12/1997 5,327 5,327 -- 39,998.94 4,560 2,000            18973/05 07/03/2005 MALYAROV Anatoliy Yegorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 26/07/2001 10,578 -- -- 17,038.07 2,840 2,000            19097/05 07/03/2005 VAKULIN Sergiy Petrovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 02/03/1998 5,149 4,856.27 50 1,000 27,849.40 4,440 2,000            19103/05 07/03/2005 BEZNOSYUK Yevgen Leonidovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv, 11/12/2000 15,192.12 4,346.27 10,634.85 211 -- 29,838.40 3,120 2,000            19141/05 12/05/2005 1)SAZONOV Victor Sergiyovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 16/12/1997 1,895 1,895 -- 14,229.02 4,560 2,000       2)VARTYLETSKYY Volodymyr Borysovych Obukhivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 30/04/1999 3,398.56 -- -- 13,829.18 3,920 2,000       3) KATROSHA Oleksandr Petrovich Brovarskyy Town Court of Kyiv Region, 07/05/1998 1,980 1,878.06 101.94 12,322.01 4,360 2,000       4) CHORNYY Vitaliy Grygorovych Vatutinskyy District Court of Kyiv,24/04/2001 4,152 4,152 -- 7,293.72 2,960 2,000       5) EFYMENKO Victor Georgiyovych Moskovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 26/02/1998 6,834 6,082.63 351.93 47,627.08 4,480 2,000       6) CHUY Mykola Fedorovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 30/05/2001 4,366 4,366.56 -- 7,453.35 2,920 2,000       7) GAVRYLYUK Anatoliy Mykolayovych Shepetivskyy District Court of Khmelnitskyy Region, 16/01/1998 2,430 2,329.65 100.35 17,579.86 4,520 2,000       8) OSYPENKO Volodymyr Vasylyovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 04/04/2001 2,955 2,955 -- 5,190.98 2,960 2,000       9) GRABOVYUK Mykola Ivanovych Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 18/01/2001 5,584.17 5,584.17 -- 14,215.48 3,080 2,000 Vyshgorodskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 16/04/2001 2,018.15 2,018.15 --       10) FEDORENKO Petro Sergiyovych Sosnivskyy District Court of Cherkasy Region, 26/11/1998 11,430.83 6,024.91 3,934.74 588.52 53,499.79 4,120 2,000       11) GRYTSAYENKO Vasyl Ivanovych Ivankivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 20/08/1997 2,026 1,186 840.74 -- 17,947.59 4,720 2,000       12) MOROZOV Mykola Vasylyovych Novokakhovskyy Town Court of Kherson Region, 20/04/1998 2,495 2,364 130.46 15,283.85 4,400 2,000       13) ZINCHENKO Victor Sergiyovych Obukhivskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 27/11/1998 8,695 2,793.40 4,815 According to the Government the applicant received 1,086.60; according to the applicant – only 446.91 40,699 4,120 2,000   &#