CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG23
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 17 février 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC004491704
- Date
- 17 février 2009
- Publication
- 17 février 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s6477A72F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s22B68395 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } .sCB5513E7 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s662A0995 { width:8.93pt; display:inline-block } .s5AA04E69 { width:166.62pt; display:inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 44917/04 by Valentyna Mykolayivna MIROSHNYK against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 17   February 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Rait Maruste,   Karel Jungwiert,   Mark Villiger,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Zdravka Kalaydjieva, judges,   Stanislav Shevchuk, ad hoc judge, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 December 2003, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mrs Valentyna Mykolayivna Miroshnyk, a Ukrainian national who was born in 1949 and lives in the Kirovograd Region. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev. The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non-enforcement of the judgment of 15 June 2001 of the Oleksandriya Town Court in her favour. Notice of the application was given to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the case on 21   July   2008. By letter of 11 August 2008, the applicant was invited to submit her observations in reply together with any claims for just satisfaction by 22   September 2008. However, the applicant failed to do so. Moreover, she failed to respond to a registered letter dated 27 October 2008, warning the applicant of the possibility that her case might be struck out of the Court’s list. THE LAW Having regard to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, the Court concludes that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the examination of this application to be continued.   For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.     Claudia Westerdiek   Peer Lorenzen   Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 23
- Date
- 17 février 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC004491704
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral