CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG4
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 26 mars 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326DEC001539906
- Date
- 26 mars 2009
- Publication
- 26 mars 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE256019B { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s507451D6 { width:4.53pt; display:inline-block } .s4A0CEAF8 { width:194.77pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE8EB5753 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2C4C33DE { border:2.25pt double #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s42015D7A { height:27.25pt } .s6A8452EA { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; vertical-align:top } .sE934BC15 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s49D3407D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; vertical-align:top } .s2F648AB0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s9120B63B { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; vertical-align:top } .s75EC4CD6 { height:12pt } .sB9498F2D { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s17F5ADB3 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s5D47294B { border-style:double solid solid; border-width:1.5pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .sEA97D001 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:12pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s5A43E03A { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s3B3FE78A { height:19.9pt } .s7AFFB26C { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s5D13652C { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .sF4EDB80C { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s689ACF7B { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s26CDE78A { height:13.5pt } .s4DCB5376 { border-style:solid solid double; border-width:0.75pt 0.75pt 1.5pt; vertical-align:top } .sD71D5D6E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:1.5pt; vertical-align:top } .s5B1E263B { height:26.5pt } .s38135D7A { height:29.25pt } .s23FE5D7A { height:24.45pt } .sF88AB0A7 { height:15.75pt } .sC8D1E78A { height:16.8pt } .s4A12885 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .s8C098047 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .s4441DA42 { border-style:solid solid double; border-width:0.75pt 0.75pt 2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .s379AB456 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:double; border-bottom-width:2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .s2A7D4500 { height:31.8pt } .s1666B0A7 { height:13.55pt } .s352FB0A7 { height:17.25pt } .s460A4CD6 { height:18pt } .s7CD1C7E { height:9pt } .sD7B9B0A7 { height:11.25pt } .s55601073 { height:21pt } .s166AB0A7 { height:14.25pt } .s978EE78A { height:12.9pt } .s41D34707 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .sDF759458 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCBD60170 { margin-left:0.02pt; border-collapse:collapse } .sB74C263B { height:23.4pt } .s8CD4D9EC { border-style:double solid double double; border-width:2.25pt 0.75pt 1.5pt 2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .sDD839B7D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:12pt; background-color:#ffffff } .sC24E4E54 { margin-left:7.1pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s99D0C9B4 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-14.2pt; font-size:12pt } .sE38D8F6A { border-style:double solid; border-width:2.25pt 0.75pt 1.5pt; vertical-align:top } .sB0511BF5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:7.05pt; font-size:12pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s73CC8F8D { border-style:double solid solid; border-width:2.25pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .s22155D7A { height:23.25pt } .s2623C0A3 { border-style:double solid solid double; border-width:1.5pt 0.75pt 0.75pt 2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .sAFFDB04 { border-top-style:double; border-top-width:1.5pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .sD5DBA247 { border-style:double solid double double; border-width:1.5pt 0.75pt 1.5pt 2.25pt; vertical-align:top } .s1C66EEDF { border-style:double solid; border-width:1.5pt 0.75pt; vertical-align:top } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 15399/06 by Inna Grigoryevna NAYDA and 6 other applications (16071/06, 16095/06, 16096/06, 16142/06, 23535/06 and 26662/06) against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   March 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Christos Rozakis, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Dean Spielmann,   Sverre Erik Jebens,   Giorgio Malinverni,   George Nicolaou, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above seven applications listed in Annex I, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are seven Russian nationals, whose names and dates of birth are listed in the Annex I. The Russian Government (“the Government”) are represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicants sued the municipal enterprise Engelslift EMO of the Saratov Region for unpaid salary. On the dates tabulated in Appendix I the Justice of the Peace of the 8th Court Circuit of Engels of the Saratov Region by court writs and judgments ordered the respondent enterprise to pay the applicants the sums indicated in Appendix I in respect of salary arrears. The awards became enforceable on the dates listed in Appendix I. The final judicial decisions in the applicants' favour remain unexecuted in part. COMPLAINT The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about non-execution of the final judicial decisions in their favour. THE LAW On 2 February 2009 the Government informed the Court that the applicants and the Engels Municipal District Council of the Saratov Region had reached a settlement. They submitted copies of the similar settlement agreements, each dated 26 December 2008 and signed by the Head of the Engels Municipal District Council and an applicant concerned. Under the terms of the respective agreements, the Head of the Engels Municipal District Council undertook to arrange payment to the applicants of the amounts indicated in Appendix II in respect of the judgment debts and compensation of non-pecuniary damage caused by the non-enforcement of the domestic awards in their favour. Those sums should be paid to the applicants within three months from the date of notification of the Court's decision under Article 39 of the Convention. The applicants undertook to withdraw their application lodged with the Court. On 10 February 2009 a copy of the Government's letter of 2 February 2009 and the respective settlement agreements were sent to the applicants. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached at the domestic level. It is satisfied that the settlements are based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article   37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Søren Nielsen   Christos Rozakis   Registrar   President   Appendix I. Applicants and domestic judgments in their favour Application, date of intro. Applicant's name Judgments or court writs Award (RUB) Award enforceable on 15399/06 09/03/2006 NAYDA Inna Girgoryevna (1940) 15 January 2003 (court writ) 12,791.74 15 January 2003       21 January 2003 43,778.80 1 February 2003     13 March 2003 1,000.00 24 March 2003 16071/06 09/03/2006 GRIGORYEVA Tatyana Vasilyevna (1949) 29 March 2002 (court writ) 14,542.65 29 March 2002       17 February 2003 (judgment) 47,288.39 28 February 2003 16095/06 17/03/2006 KUZNETSOVA Tatyana Valentinovna (1968) 15 January 2003 (court writ) 7,171.48 15 January 2003       21 January 2003 7,419.84 3 February 2003     13 March 2003 1,000.00 24 March 2003 16096/06 16/03/2006 SHONINA Vera Grigoryevna (1945) 15 January 2003 (court writ) 12,791.74 15 January 2003       21 January 2003 55,978.43 3 February 2003     13 March 2003 1,000.00 24 March 2003 16142/06 17/03/2006 NUSHTAYEVA Lyudmila Ivanovna (1954) 29 March 2002 (court writ) 12,123.52 29 March 2002       25 August 2003 27,024.84 5 September 2003 23535/06 10/04/2006 BEDNOVA Galina Vasilyevna (1954) 18 March 2002 (court writ) 15,754.55 18 March 2002       1 April 2002 (court writ) 3,303.83 1 April 2002       11 April 2002 10,377.49 23 April 2002 26662/06 28/03/2006 ALIMOVA Natalya Aleksandrovna (1954) 11 March 2002 (court writ) 15,582.73 11 March 2002       22 March 2002 (court writ) 13,370.86 22 March 2002       11 April 2002 10,574.98 23 April 2002         APPENDIX II. Terms of the settlement agreements Application   Applicant's name Amount to be paid in respect of: Judgment debt (RUB) Non-pecuniary damage (RUB) 15399/06   Nayda I.G. 57,570.54 60,000 16071/06   Grigoryeva T.V. 61,831 60,000 16095/06   Kuznetsova T.V. 15,591.32 15,000 16096/06   Shonina V.G. 69,770.17 70,000 16142/06   Nushtayeva L. I. 39,148 40,000 23535/06   Bednova G.V. 29,435.87 30,000 26662/06   Alimova N.A. 39,528.57 40,000    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 4
- Date
- 26 mars 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326DEC001539906
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral