CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG23
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 31 mars 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC001315704
- Date
- 31 mars 2009
- Publication
- 31 mars 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s53D63747 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:36pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC9846896 { width:180.89pt; display:inline-block } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13157/04 by Viktor SERWETNICKÝ and Anna SERWETNICKÁ against the Czech Republic The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 31   March 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Rait Maruste, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Renate Jaeger,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Zdravka Kalaydjieva, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 5 April 2004, Having regard to the partial decision of 6 May 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicants, Mr Viktor Serwetnický and Mrs Anna Serwetnická, are Czech nationals who were born in 1937 and 1941 respectively and live in Valašská Bystřice. They are represented before the Court by Mr J. Miketa, of the Czech Bar. The Czech Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, of the Ministry of Justice. The applicants originally complained about a violation of their property rights guaranteed under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in that they had been obliged to surrender certain agricultural land in the context of restitution proceedings. On 6 May 2008 the Court communicated the application to the respondent Government which submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application on 5 September 2008. On 9 September 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ representative who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 23   October 2008. On 27 November 2008 the Registry of the Court sent the applicant’s representative another letter by registered mail stating that since no reply had been received the Court would consider striking the case out of its list. The applicants’ representative received this letter on 2   December 2008, but he has not contacted the Court since on the matter. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Claudia Westerdiek   Rait Maruste RegistrarPresident  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 23
- Date
- 31 mars 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC001315704
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral