CEDHCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG4
CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG — 28 mai 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD003286506
- Date
- 28 mai 2009
- Publication
- 28 mai 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s598389FF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:18pt } .sF5E1C6CF { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; color:#ff0000 } .sE208486F { font-family:Arial; color:#ff0000 } .s491F5244 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sC443675D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD2857263 { margin-top:30pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s40E9DAE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s988F61DE { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s3E2DB4A0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s281358E1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s8A9F351B { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s804EF768 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s11869A80 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7EE1C8F0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9F223FEE { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s8E011338 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD0489F03 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sAB173E38 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s82D7B801 { width:22.93pt; display:inline-block } .sF9287AF { width:174.97pt; display:inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s479A30ED { width:142.24%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7980263B { height:21.6pt } .s64B91C87 { width:9.2%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sE4E126D3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.5pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.5pt; text-align:right; font-size:10pt } .s3F0B72EC { width:14.48%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .sAE73F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:10pt } .s75E611F7 { width:32.9%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sD361F596 { width:6.58%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s48164669 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:0.1pt; text-align:right; font-size:10pt } .s5DB52F66 { width:13.16%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s31B4657B { width:10.96%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s7089073C { width:12.72%; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s3B3FE78A { height:19.9pt } .sBF5502A7 { width:9.2%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sD825F3D6 { width:14.48%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s2FF413C3 { width:32.9%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sDE7EE5C3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:10pt; font-size:10pt } .s49A66A48 { width:6.58%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .sC4907629 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:10pt; text-align:right; font-size:10pt } .sDA2B8AF { width:13.16%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s59140433 { width:10.96%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt } .s36815C1B { width:12.72%; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.4pt }     FIRST SECTION     CASE OF SENCHENKO AND OTHERS and 35 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v. RUSSIA   (Applications nos. 32865/06, 3137/07, 3158/07, 5650/07, 5654/07, 5657/07, 5663/07, 6727/07, 6822/07, 6828/07, 6846/07, 8553/07, 8560/07, 11576/07, 11578/07, 11582/07, 11583/07, 11584/07, 11585/07, 12966/07, 13830/07, 13831/07, 13833/07, 13835/07, 19001/07, 19003/07, 19736/07, 19738/07, 19740/07, 19741/07, 19744/07, 19746/07, 19749/07, 19752/07, 20343/07, and 20939/07)     JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   28 May 2009   FINAL   06/11/2009   This judgment may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Senchenko and Others and 35 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v.   Russia , The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Christos Rozakis, President,   Nina Vajić,   Anatoly Kovler,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Dean Spielmann,   Sverre Erik Jebens,   George Nicolaou, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 7 May 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in 36 applications against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 90 Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated in the Annex (“the applicants”). The applications’ dates of introduction are also tabulated in the Annex. On 4 September 2007 one of the applicants, Ms Skripka Nadezhda Yegorovna, died, and her daughter, Ms Skripka Oksana Vasiliyevna, adopted her application. On an unspecified date another applicant, Mr Maznitsa Dmitriy Anatolyevich, died, but no heir showed interest in pursuing his application. 2.     The applicants were represented by Mr I. Novikov, a lawyer practising in Novosibirsk. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mrs V. Milinchuk, former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.     The President of the First Section decided to communicate the applications to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility (Article 29 § 3) and to join the applications (Rule 42 of the Rules of Court). THE FACTS 4.     The applicants are pensioners. They sued a pension authority for miscalculating their pensions. The Neryungri Town Court of Yakutia held for the applicants. The Supreme Court of Yakutia upheld those judgments on appeal and they became binding. Later, on the pension authority’s request, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Yakutia quashed the judgments on supervisory review because it considered that the courts below had misinterpreted material law. The dates of the court decisions are tabulated in the Annex. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 5.     The applicants complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 about the quashing of their judgments. The Court considers it appropriate to examine this complaint under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 only. Insofar as relevant, these Articles read as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair   ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal...” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law. The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.” A.     Admissibility 6.     The Government argued that the applications were inadmissible. The proceedings in question had been outside the sphere of Article 6 because they had concerned pension laws of a general application. Supervisory review had been a legitimate feature of Russia’s legal system. The judgments had had to be quashed because they had been based on a misapplication of law and hence had contained a fundamental defect. The supervisory review had aimed to ensure a uniform application of pension laws and hence promoted legal certainty. The domestic procedure for supervisory review had been respected. The supervisory review had been set in motion by a party to the proceedings and had happened shortly after the judgments had become binding. Annulment of binding judgments had been legitimate in a democratic society and known, for example, to such countries as Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Besides, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe had found that Russia’s supervisory-review procedure had improved. In the cases at hand, the supervisory review had not breached Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because the authorities left to the applicants the sums paid before the quashing. Besides, since the Presidium had in the end found that the applicants’ claims had been unfounded, they had not had a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. 7.     The applicants insisted that their applications were admissible. The judgments had been correct. The Presidium’s disagreement with the lower courts’ reading of the law had not justified the quashing. Even though the State had left to the applicants the sums paid before the quashing, these sums had still been lower that they should have been under the judgments. 8.     The Court notes, first, that Mr Maznitsa has died and that no heir has shown interest in pursuing his part of application no. 6727/07. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of that application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike Mr Maznitsa’s part of application no.   6727/07 out of the list. 9.     As to the other applicants, the Court finds that their disputes concerned their individual pensions and hence fell within the ambit of Article   6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Magomedov v.   Russia , no.   20111/03, § 16, 4 December 2008). 10.     The Court notes that the applications are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 11.     The Court has earlier found violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 where, like in the present cases, supervisory review was used to quash a binding judgment on the ground of an alleged misinterpretation of material law (see, for example, Kot v. Russia , no. 20887/03, § 29, 18 January 2007). There is no reason to depart from that finding in the present case. 12.     There has, accordingly, been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.     Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 14.     The applicants set out claims for just satisfaction in their initial application forms, but failed to resubmit these claims at the appropriate stage of the proceedings, i.e. after notice of the applications had been given to the Government. 15.     Nevertheless, the Court considers it reasonable in the circumstances of the present applications to grant the applicants just satisfaction ad hoc (see Levochkina v. Russia , no. 944/02, §§ 53–55, 5 July 2007). Making its assessment on an equitable and reasonable basis, the Court awards each applicant 2,000 euros in respect of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Decides to strike out of its list of cases Mr Maznitsa’s part of application no. 6727/07;   3.     Declares the other applications admissible;   4.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   5.     Holds (a)     that the respondent State is to pay each applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article   44   §   2 of the Convention, EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, to be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;   Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 May 2009, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.   Søren Nielsen   Christos Rozakis   Registrar   President ANNEX   Appl. no. Introduced on Name of Applicant Born Judgment of Binding on Quashed on 32865/06 17/06/06 Senchenko Naylya Rukhkhulovna 1940 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Dmitriyeva Alevtina Ivanovna 1952 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Dmitriyeva Margarita Petrovna 1939 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Levitskiy Nikolay Savelyevich 1934 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Levitskaya Natalya Aleksandrovna 1936 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Lebedeva Vera Yevdokimovna 1949 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Makusheva Svetlana Aleksandrovna 1935 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Moskaleva Galina Yegorovna 1950 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Moskalev Nikolay Vasilyevich 1946 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Plakhotnichenko Pavel Igorevich 1946 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06     Spiridonova Taisiya Vasilyevna 1949 01/04/04 12/05/04 09/02/06 3137/07 29/11/06 Zhmurin Yuriy Viktorovich 1948 03/05/04 28/03/05 27/07/06     Karbovskaya Galina Ivanovna 1950 03/05/04 28/03/05 27/07/06 3158/07 01/12/06 Chumakova Anna Dmitriyevna 1944 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06 5650/07 15/11/06 Sagaydakova Lyudmila Vasilyevna 1940 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Demakova Natalya Vladislavovna 1951 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Kozlova Lyudmila Alekseyevna 1940 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Korshikova Vera Pavlovna 1934 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Khvorova Lyubov Alekseyevna 1949 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Muzyreva Nina Vasilyevna 1949 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Myzyrev Yuriy Pavlovich 1943 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Ilchuk Valeriy Georgiyevich 1950 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Kazarenko Vladimir Savelyevich 1930 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06     Labzin Nikolay Ivanovich 1945 05/10/04 21/03/05 24/08/06 5654/07 17/11/06 Ostrova Lyudmila Petrovna 1952 30/11/04 21/03/05 27/07/06 5657/07 29/12/06 Matveyeva Lidiya Ivanovna 1948 21/04/05 06/06/05 12/10/06     Loseva Tamara Moiseyevna 1954 21/04/05 06/06/05 12/10/06     Solovyova Galina Stepanovna 1946 21/04/05 06/06/05 12/10/06 5663/07 17/11/06 Loginova Tamara Ivanovna 1941 28/09/04 21/03/05 24/08/06 6727/07 01/10/06 Vasilyeva Nina Leonidovna 1945 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06     Doruda Yevgeniy Nikiforovich 1945 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06     Lefterova Lyudmila Aleksandrovna 1954 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06     Maznitsa Dmitriy Anatolyevich 1971 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06     Podozyorov Vladimir Mikhaylovich 1949 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06     Fyodorova Mariya Lukinichna 1954 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06 6822/07 29/12/06 Vinnik Grigoriy Yakovlevich 1949 23/03/05 04/05/05 24/08/06 6828/07 29/12/06 Sharshavina Lyubov Demyanovna 1954 17/03/05 18/04/05 24/08/06 6846/07 22/12/06 Pyankov Viktor Arkadyevich 1950 28/06/05 01/08/05 16/11/06     Pyankova Mariya Mikhaylovna 1950 28/06/05 01/08/05 16/11/06 8553/07 12/01/07 Krupa Tamara Ivanovna 1947 04/03/05 18/04/05 24/08/06 8560/07 16/01/07 Lebid Roman Petrovich 1963 18/11/04 21/03/05 27/07/06 11576/07 11/12/06 Burlakova Tatyana Andreyevna 1957 22/11/04 21/03/05 13/07/06     Vintovkina Nadezhda Alekseyevna 1954 22/11/04 21/03/05 13/07/06 11578/07 08/11/06 Torlova Tatyana Nikitichna 1953 05/10/04 23/03/05 27/07/06 11582/07 09/11/06 Avdeyeva Valentina Stepanovna 1948 27/09/04 21/03/05 27/07/06     Ovechkin Grigoriy Pavlovich 1949 27/09/04 21/03/05 27/07/06 11583/07 11/12/06 Bystrov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich 1953 16/08/04 21/03/05 27/07/06 11584/07 11/12/06 Belyayev Viktor Fyodorovich 1939 17/03/05 18/04/05 27/07/06 11585/07 07/11/06 Shipitsyna Lyudmila Georgiyevna 1949 30/11/04 23/03/05 24/08/06 12966/07 02/01/07 Ananyeva Tamara Nikolayevna 1950 31/03/05 08/06/05 27/07/06 13830/07 15/02/07 Samikova Lyudmila Alekseyevna 1954 30/03/05 06/06/05 16/11/06     Yesipenko Nikolay Stepanovich 1947 30/03/05 06/06/05 16/11/06 13831/07 11/02/07 Gredasova Lyubov Vasilyevna 1951 07/04/05 06/06/05 16/11/06 13833/07 15/02/07 Kim Lev Borisovich 1949 09/03/05 11/04/05 24/08/06 13835/07 15/02/07 Kostovarov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich 1952 23/03/05 23/05/05 16/11/06 19001/07 21/03/07 Varnakova Larisa Aleksandrovna 1952 21/04/05 29/06/05 19/10/06     Morozova Nadezhda Alekseyevna 1948 21/04/05 29/06/05 19/10/06     Skripka Nadezhda Yegorovna 1947 21/04/05 29/06/05 19/10/06     Fritz Galina Fyodorovna 1935 21/04/05 29/06/05 19/10/06 19003/07 16/02/07 Derevyannykh Valentina Mikhaylovna 1956 28/06/05 01/08/05 30/11/06     Davletov Talgat Shakirovich 1950 28/06/05 01/08/05 30/11/06     Oleynikova Vera Georgiyevna 1955 28/06/05 01/08/05 30/11/06     Ryazanova Svetlana Ivanovna 1962 28/06/05 01/08/05 30/11/06     Pavlik Pyotr Nikitovich 1949 28/06/05 01/08/05 30/11/06 19736/07 07/03/07 Fedko Vladimir Mikhaylovich 1950 10/06/05 06/07/05 12/10/06 19738/07 01/03/07 Shumikhina Lyudmila Mikhaylovna 1946 07/04/05 06/06/05 12/10/06 19740/07 01/03/07 Gaponova Olga Aleksandrovna 1954 07/04/05 06/06/05 12/10/06     Drozhzhina Galina Alekseyevna 1948 07/04/05 06/06/05 12/10/06 19741/07 01/03/07 Aleksandrov Nikolay Mikhaylovich 1954 27/06/05 27/07/05 12/10/06 19744/07 23/02/07 Veretelnik Anatoliy Mikhaylovich 1947 21/03/05 23/05/05 12/10/06` 19746/07 27/02/07 Godunova Natalya Ivanovna 1954 08/04/05 08/06/05 16/11/06     Zolotukhina Tatyana Prokopyevna 1954 08/04/05 08/06/05 16/11/06     Samoylova Lyubov Davydovna 1954 08/04/05 08/06/05 16/11/06 19749/07 23/02/07 Koreneva Lyudmila Georgiyevna 1955 29/04/05 20/06/05 09/11/06     Skripelyova Valentina Mikhaylovna 1954 29/04/05 20/06/05 09/11/06     Stolova Tamara Vladimirovna 1954 29/04/05 20/06/05 09/11/06 19752/07 07/03/07 Stepanova Tatyana Ivanovna 1951 04/04/05 08/06/05 16/11/06     Sinitsyna Anna Ivanovna 1951 04/04/05 08/06/05 16/11/06 20343/07 16/02/07 Andrianova Yelena Fyodorovna 1954 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Dorokhov Gennadiy Petrovich 1950 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Davletova Firuza Shaykhenurovna 1955 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Kotova Olga Igorevna 1957 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Parshin Sergey Aleksandrovich 1956 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Shcherbakov Aleksandr Aleksandrovich 1949 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Shcherbakova Tatyana Innokentyevna 1954 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Kravchenko Yekaterina Filippovna 1931 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06     Pigolkina Tatyana Pavlovna 1954 11/05/05 15/06/05 16/11/06 20939/07 10/04/07 Plakhotnik Mariya Yevstafyevna 1938 26/09/05 31/10/05 16/11/06     Kolesnikova Yelena Dmitriyevna 1943 26/09/05 31/10/05 16/11/06     Sergeyeva Lyudmila Mikhaylovna 1945 26/09/05 31/10/05 16/11/06  Articles de loi cités
Article 6 CEDHArticle P1-1 CEDH
Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
- Formation
- 4
- Date
- 28 mai 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD003286506
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral