CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG23
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 17 novembre 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC002982205
- Date
- 17 novembre 2009
- Publication
- 17 novembre 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2EF16B1D { width:35.4pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s66E9FC38 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s867F9C1B { width:175.28pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 29822/05 by Volodymyr Grygorovych TERESHCHENKO against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 17   November 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, judges,   Mykhaylo Buromenskiy, ad hoc judge, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 July 2005, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Volodymyr Grygorovych Tereshchenko, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1937 and lives in the town of Chasiv - Yar. He was represented before the Court by Mr Vasyl Petrovych Mokhnenko, a lawyer practising in Ukraine. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. By judgment of 14 September 2000 the Artemovsk Court awarded the applicant 2,122.53 [1] Ukrainian hryvnias (UAH) in disability allowance arrears, to be paid by the applicant’s former employer, the State company Chasiv-Yarskoye spechupravleniye po remontu oborudovaniya, zdaniy i sooruzheniy. Relying on Articles 1 and 6   §   1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 the applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the above judgment. By letter dated 10 October 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any comments together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 28   November 2008. By letter dated 6 May 2009, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was informed that the deadline for submission of the comments had expired. His attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. On 23 May 2009 the applicant’s representative received the Court’s letter. No response has been received to date. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Claudia Westerdiek   Peer Lorenzen   Registrar   President [1] Around EUR 455Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 23
- Date
- 17 novembre 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC002982205
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral