CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG7
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 19 janvier 2010
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC004576908
- Date
- 19 janvier 2010
- Publication
- 19 janvier 2010
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sEBAA59BE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.25pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sD0118C26 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.25pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s25569CB8 { width:21.75pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF0E11760 { width:14.25pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF8DCB537 { width:16.53pt; display:inline-block } .sC2C80E1C { width:180.76pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 45769/08 by Zbigniew KOZDÓJ against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on   19   January 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas Bratza, President,     Lech Garlicki,     Giovanni Bonello,     Ljiljana Mijović,     Päivi Hirvelä,     Ledi Bianku,     Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 September 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Zbigniew Kozdój, a Polish national who was born in 1969 and lives in Osiecznica. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of   the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The applicant’s complaint under Article 6 concerning the length of the criminal proceedings was communicated to the Government, who submitted their friendly-settlement proposal. By letter dated 14 August 2009 the applicant was requested to submit comments on the Government’s proposal by 14 September 2009 and again by 2 November 2009. By letter dated 10 November 2009, sent to the Zielona Góra Detention Centre, the applicant was requested to inform the Court by 8   December   2009 whether he wished to pursue his application. The same latter was sent to the Branice Regional Psychiatric Hospital and to the applicant’s home address. All letters, sent by registered mail with an   acknowledgment of   receipt, were returned unclaimed. The applicant has not to date resumed correspondence with the Court in   the instant case. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be   regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its   Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Lawrence Early   Nicolas Bratza   Registrar   President  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 7
- Date
- 19 janvier 2010
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC004576908
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral