CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG4
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 3 juin 2010
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603DEC001828410
- Date
- 3 juin 2010
- Publication
- 3 juin 2010
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sBFD8E45 { width:185.97pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s22652CDB { width:118.52%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sCB5737D7 { width:29.16%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s89A88D8F { width:33.34%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s50D7BE38 { width:37.5%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3D9A64C5 { width:29.16%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s5869E0CC { width:29.16%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3CAB72D { width:33.34%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s20FB408D { width:37.5%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 18284/10 by Galina Nikolayevna AVERYANOVA and Others against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3 June 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Christos Rozakis, President,   Nina Vajić,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Giorgio Malinverni,   George Nicolaou, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 May 2003, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicants are Russian citizens residing in Yelnat, Ivanovo Region, whose names are tabulated below. The Russian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agents, Mr Laptev and Ms   Milinchuk, the former Representatives of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The applicants complained about prolonged non-payment of children allowances awarded to them by the domestic court. The Court initially examined the present applications together with those lodged by three other applicants in the case no. 24381/03 (Kalinina and   Others v. Russia). On 12 December 2005 the case was communicated to the respondent Government. On 13 June 2006 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the Government and the seven applicants listed below who agreed to waive any further claims against the Russian Federation in respect of the facts giving rise to their applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay them the sums tabulated below covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses. The sums were to be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. They would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. André Wampach   Christos Rozakis Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX   Applicant’s name Sums to be paid under the friendly settlements Judgment debt (euros) Sums to cover pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses (euros) Averyanova   Galina Nilolayevna 48 (forty eight) 150 (one hundred fifty) Borisenko Vera Aleksandrovna 52 (fifty two) 188 (one hundred eighty eight) Burdylev Nikolay Mikhaylovich 104 (one hundred and four) 370 (three hundred seventy) Glebova Marina Vladimirovna 96 (ninety six) 313 (three hundred thirteen) Kirsanov Leonid Nikolayevich 70 (seventy) 200 (two hundred) Plichkina Nataliya Aleksandrovna 141 (one hundred forty one) 448 (four hundred forty eight) Zapankov Valeriy Anatoliyevich 56 (fifty six) 192 (one hundred ninety two)    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
- Formation
- 4
- Date
- 3 juin 2010
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603DEC001828410
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral