CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG — 11 janvier 2011

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s36109428 { width:18.7pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s1F6AC3E7 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE950BED4 { width:22.54pt; display:inline-block } .s24D84E5E { width:158.76pt; display:inline-block } .s850EA3CF { width:20.24pt; display:inline-block } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .s1C0B4509 { width:230.14pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 9128/06 by Tibor IZSÁK against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 11   January 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Danutė Jočienė,   Dragoljub Popović,   András Sajó,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Kristina Pardalos,   Guido Raimondi, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 1 March 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The application was lodged by Mr Tibor Izsák, a Hungarian national who was born in 1954 and lived in Mór. He was represented before the Court by Mr D. Istvánfalvi, a lawyer practising in Székesfehérvár. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. The applicant complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the outcome and the alleged unfairness of a real-estate dispute. On 16 September 2010 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints. By letter of 19 October 2010 the applicant’s lawyer informed the Registry that the applicant had died and that his application to the Court would not be pursued because his heirs had no such intention. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the applicant’s heirs do not wish to pursue the application within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 of the Convention. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Stanley Naismith   Françoise Tulkens   Registrar   President