CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 14 février 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s2ED5B6D8 { width:18.54pt; display:inline-block } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sDD165512 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sB2EDE122 { width:158.28pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .sB13AD4B4 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#d9d9d9 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s50D91445 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#d9d9d9 } .s926B7440 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#d9d9d9 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s85CAF366 { margin-left:17.85pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sD85BBB70 { width:24.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s69AD57A4 { width:19.88pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 45616/08 Radmilo TOMIĆ against Serbia and 20 other applications   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 14   February 2012 as a Committee composed of:   András Sajó, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged between 15 September 2008 and 12 December 2008, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE   The applicants are Serbian nationals (for additional personal details see the appended table). They are all represented by the same attorney, Ms. Daroslava Todorović, a lawyer practising in Kraljevo. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr S. Carić. Without invoking any particular provision of the Convention the applicants complained about the respondent State’s failure to enforce final judgments in their favour against different limited liability companies owned by Koncern Farika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju , which was, at the relevant time, a company predominantly consisting of socially-owned capital (“socially-owned company”). As of the present date it is predominantly comprised of State-owned capital. The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the appended table. Between 5 December 2011 and 5 January 2012 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 5,500 (five thousand five hundred) euros to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government will pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present case (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Françoise Elens-Passos   András Sajó Deputy Registrar   President   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant name year of birth place of residence Final domestic decision (issuing authority / case no., adopted on) Company name, seat, other information Enforcement order (enforcement authority, case no. , date of order)                    45616/08 15/09/2008 Radmilo TOMIĆ 1959 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 835/00 of 30 March 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Procesna oprema” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1545/05 of 16/03/2006 I. 212/08 of 24/01/2008                    57334/08 05/11/2008 Darko VUKOJIČIĆ 1979 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 388/01 of 25 January 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1629/05 of 16/03/2006 I. 180/08 of 29/01/2008                    57335/08 05/11/2008 Simka PERIŠIĆ 1938 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1022/00 of 23 May 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 187/06 of 16/03/2006 I. 268/08 of 31/01/2008                    13077/09 12/12/2008 Milovan TOMOVIĆ 1966 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 2354/01 of 03 February 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1400/05 of 03/11/2005 I. 59/08 of 21/01/2008                    13082/09 12/12/2008 Aleksandar SENIČIĆ 1947 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 385/01 of 26 April 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Turs” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1405/05 of 03/11/2005 I. 82/08 of 16/01/2005                    13085/09 12/12/2009 Miljko PETROVIĆ 1947 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 238/01 of 25 April 2005 (amended by the judgement of the District Court in Kraljevo no. Gž. 1031/05 of 18/08/2005) Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Održavanje” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1396/05 of 03/11/2005 I. 74/08 of 17/01/2008                    13092/09 12/12/2009 Borivoje ĐURAŠEVIĆ 1957 Adrani   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 752/04 of 12 July 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Održavanje” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1573/05 of 23/11/2005 I. 185/08 of 31/01/2008                    13100/09 12/12/2008 Mladen PILČEVIĆ 1956 Žiča   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1041/03 of 16 September 2003 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Održavanje” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1/05 of 10/01/2005 I. 192/08 of 28/01/2008                    13119/09 12/12/2008 Dragoš JOKOVIĆ 1961 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1317/03 of 28 September 2004 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Termoplastika” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1216/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 160/08 of 29/01/2008                 13141/09 12/12/2009 Tomislav VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ 1954 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1317/03 of 28 September 2004 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Termoplastika” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1260/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 230/08 of 29/01/2008                 13259/09 12/12/2009 Dragoljub KOSTIĆ 1948 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1022/03 of 12 September 2003 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 40/05 of 21/01/2005 I. 271/08 of 4/02/2008                 13274/09 12/12/2008 Mirjana BAKIĆ 1946 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 967/00 of 03 February 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1467/05 of 10/11/2005 I. 227/08 of 21/01/2008                   13291/09 12/12/2008 Milomir VRANIĆ 1935 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 296/01 of 25 January 2005   Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1257/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 171/08 of 30/01/2008                 13365/09 12/12/2008 Saša MICIĆ 1974 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 383/01 of 3 February 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1254/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 219/08 of 09/01/2008                 13367/09 12/12/2008 Goran VUJANAC 1969 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 389/01 of 3 February 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1246/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 211/08 of 01/02/2008                 13409/09 12/12/2008 Milan SIMEUNOVIĆ 1950 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 207/01 of 09 June 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1241/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 209/08 of 01/02/2008                   13420/09 12/12/2008 Radomir CVETKOVIĆ 1947 Lađevci   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 965/00 of 09 June 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1249/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 208/08 of 28/01/2008                 13428/09 12/12/2008 Radojica ČUKANOVIĆ 1953 Žiča   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP.377/01 of 3 February 2005 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Vagonogradnja” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1452/05 of 08/11/2005 I. 205/08 of 01/02/2008                 13441/09 12/12/2008 Saša BORIĆ 1968 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1017/03 of 14 June 2004 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Termoplastika” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 175/05 of 28/02/2005 I. 239/08 of 31/01/2008                 13451/09 12/12/2008 Zoran MARKOVIĆ 1964 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP. 1017/03 of 14 June 2004 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, “Termoplastika” doo, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 139/05 of 09/02/2005 I. 236/08 of 30/01/2008                 13572/09 12/12/2008 Snježana PAVKOV-STEVANOVIĆ 1951 Kraljevo   Municipal Court in Kraljevo IP.1317/03 of 28 September 2004 Koncern Fabrika Vagona AD u restruktuiranju, Kraljevo Municipal Court in Kraljevo I. 1264/05 of 11/10/2005 I. 231/08 of 01/02/2008