CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 avril 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s6477A72F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5338F84 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF5C64699 { width:201.29pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sD2684627 { height:65.2pt } .s4E34B50A { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .s1C2B10C2 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sD5215167 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:9pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .s23CD0580 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s2B434500 { height:31.2pt } .s88A4DB4E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sDD8F0D07 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6A269875 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sFCCF6575 { height:35.45pt } .sF4046D70 { height:45.35pt } .sCB8B756B { height:51.05pt } .s5A0A351C { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .s11BEB50D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sEAD70FA9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s241BF43A { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 39896/05 Aleksey Fedorovich DEMCHENKO against Ukraine and 81 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 10   April   2012 as a committee composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates specified in the annexed table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are Ukrainian nationals whose names and dates of birth are specified in the annexed table. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Ms V. Lutkovska, of the Ministry of Justice. On the dates set out in the table below the domestic courts and a commission on labour disputes (applications nos. 56567/08, 26444/09 and 26446/09) ordered the authorities to pay the applicants various pecuniary amounts or take certain actions in their favour. The decisions in the applicants’ favour became final, but remain unenforced. COMPLAINTS Relying on various provisions of the Convention, the applicants complained about the delayed non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour. Some of the applicants also raised other complaints under the Convention. THE LAW 1.     The Court considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their common factual and legal background. 2.     Referring to the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov pilot judgment ( Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, ECHR 2009 ‑ ... (extracts)), the Government submitted to the Court several unilateral declarations aimed at resolving the non-enforcement issues raised in the applications. By the above declarations, the Government acknowledged the excessive duration of the enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour and declared that they were ready to pay the applicants the outstanding debts under the decisions and the sums specified in the annexed table. In some declarations the Government referred to the ex gratia principle of such payment. The Government invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The Government also declared that the compensation sums were to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, that they would be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of settlement and would be free of any taxes that might be applicable. The sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The declarations provided that the payment would constitute the final resolution of the cases. The applicants either disagreed with the declarations on various grounds and requested the Court to pursue the examination of their cases or did not provide any comments. The Court reiterates that it may at any stage of the proceedings strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusions specified under Article 37 § 1 (a)-(c) of the Convention. In particular, under Article 37 § 1 (c) the Court may strike a case out of its list if for any other reason established by the Court, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Article 37 § 1 in fine states: “However, the Court shall continue the examination of the application if respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the protocols thereto so requires”. The Court also reiterates that in certain circumstances it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration made by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no.   26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI). The Court recalls that in its pilot judgment on the issues of non ‑ enforcement it ordered Ukraine to grant redress to the applicants whose applications were communicated to the Government before the delivery of the judgment or would be communicated further to the judgment and concerned complaints about the prolonged non-enforcement of domestic decisions for which the State was responsible (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov , cited above, § 99 and point 6 of the operative part). Having examined the terms of the Government’s declarations, the Court understands them as intending to give the applicants the redress in accordance with the pilot judgment. The Court is satisfied that the Government explicitly acknowledged the excessive duration of the enforcement of the decisions given in the applicants’ favour and undertake to pay the outstanding debts, in spite of the fact that in some declarations the Government referred to ex gratia principle of such payment. It also notes that the compensation sums offered by the Government are comparable with the amounts awarded in similar cases, taking account, inter alia , specific delay in each particular case. The Court therefore considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applicants’ complaints about the lengthy non-enforcement of domestic decisions. It is also satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of these complaints. Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list in so far as they concern the lengthy non-enforcement of domestic decisions. 3.     Having carefully examined the applicants’ remaining complaints in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations in respect of the applicants’ complaints about the lengthy non-enforcement of the domestic decisions given in their favour; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in so far as they relate to the above complaints in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention; Declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible. Stephen Phillips   Mark Villiger Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No. Application number Applicant’s name, born in Date of introduction Domestic decisions about the lengthy non-enforcement of which the applicants complain (name of the court (labour dispute commission), date of decision) Compensation offered by the Government (EUR) 1 39896/05 DEMCHENKO ALEKSEY FEDOROVICH, 1957 2 November 2005 Gagarinskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 12 April 2002, 4 February 2003 and 27 October 2003 1,665 2 1220/06 GORETSKA LYUDMYLA MYKOLAYIVNA, 1962 16 December 2005 Kostopil Court, 4 October 2001 795 3 6990/06 BOYCHUK PETRO IVANOVYCH, 1954 9 January 2006 Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 24 June 2005 1,065 4 13361/06 TYVONENKO MYKOLA DMYTROVYCH, 1951 27 March 2006 Radomyshl Court, 18 June 1999 2,190 5 13386/06 KUZMENKO GENNADIY ILICH, 1957 11 March 2006 Slovyansk Court, 16 August 1999, 16 October 2000 1,950 6 27612/06 BARANOV OLEKSIY STEPANOVYCH, 1927 22 June 2006 Bershadsk Court, 2 December 2002 1,320 7 35562/06 ZATZEPILIN VLADIMIR ANATOLYEVICH, 1961 19 August 2006 Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 11 April 2001 1,320 8 37762/06 MOVA OLEG OLEKSIYOVYCH, 1957 22 August 2006 Krasnodon Court, 27 July 2004 1,260 9 42505/06 KOLYASNIKOVA TAMARA NIKOLAYEVNA, 1958 14 October 2006 Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal, 2 April 2004 1,335 10 5004/07 KLIMOV VIKTOR MAKSIMOVICH, 1936 12 January 2007 Novogrodivka Court, 23 December 2004 1,140 11 5970/07 PROKOFYEV VOLODYMYR OLEKSIYOVYCH, 1954 15 January 2007 Konstyantynivka Court, 5 February 2001 1,410 12 6961/07 GELEMEYEVA GALINA ANDREYEVNA, 1956 26 January 2007 Antratsyt Court, 22 April 2005 1,095 13 7308/07 TERNOVIK ALEKSANDR VASILYEVICH, 1983 12 January 2007 Selydove Court, 5 November 2002 1,530 14 8490/07 TATARENKO IRYNA OLEKSANDRIVNA, 1966 9 February 2007 Oleksandriya Court, 26 November 2004 1,200 15 8948/07 MYKHALCHUK VOLODYMYR YOSYPOVYCH, 1963 8 February 2007 Oleksandriya Court, 26 November 2004 1,200 16 9212/07 PIRKA VALENTYNA PANTELIYIVNA, 1962 8 February 2007 Oleksandriya Court, 6 December 2004 1,200 17 10909/07 RIZUN VASILIY GRIGORYEVICH, 1944 22 July 2007 Pokrovsk Court, 7 October 2004   1,170 18 12930/07 KORNIYENKO VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH, 1970 12 March 2007 Voznesensk Court, 26 January 2004 1,305 19 14903/07 1) BARANOV OLEKSIY STEPANOVYCH, 1927 2) BARANOVA POLINA STEPANIVNA, 1936 15 March 2007 Trostyanets Court, 12 June 2001 1,800 20 17217/07 TARASENKO ALEKSANDR SERGEYEVICH, 1949 6 April 2007 Saksaganskyy District Court of Kryvyy Rig, 19 March 2004 1,140 21 17733/07 IBRAGIMOV VIKTOR KADERZYANOVICH, 1954 16 April 2007   Stakhaniv Court, 7 November 2003 (2 judgments), 16 January 2006 1,320 22 19334/07 SKOROBUD ALEKSEY GRIGORYEVICH, 1941 26 April 2007 Krasnyy Luch Court, 6 October 2003 1,380 23 21599/07 SARAFANOV NIKOLAY IVANOVICH, 1943 12 March 2007 Krasnyy Luch Court, 28 July 2005, 18 July 2007 705 24 36016/07 KIRICHENKO VLADIMIR MAKSIMOVICH, 1947 23 July 2007 Bagliyskyy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk, 19 December 2001,   29 December 2004, 9 February 2005 and 24 March 2005 (2 judgments) 1,125 25 44547/07 SAVITSKIY VLADIMIR MIKHAYLOVICH, 1963 25 September 2007 Krasnyy Luch Court, 25 December 2003 1,335 26 44548/07 VOROBYOVA LIDIYA NIKOLAYEVNA, 1940 25 September 2007 Krasnyy Luch Court, 15 November 2006 795 27 46076/07 TKALENKO YEVGENIY YEGOROVICH, 1940 19 October 2007 Krasnyy Luch Court, 11 October 2000, 11 September 2002 and 8 February 2006 1,920 28 50976/07 TITOV VLADIMIR PETROVICH, 1951 21 October 2007 Krasnyy Luch Court, 20 April 2005, 18 December 2006 1,095 29 56287/07 KUTINSKIY STEPAN MIKHAYLOVICH, 1948 7 November 2007 Mogyliv-Podilsk Court, 5 December 2005, 12 April 2006 915 30 2304/08 TYUTYUN MYKHAYLO IVANOVYCH, 1951 29 December 2007 Nova Kakhovka Court, 13 June 1997, 16 December 1997 1,695 31 4042/08 MELNYK PAVLO IVANOVYCH, 1958 3 January 2008 Zakarpattya Regional Commercial Court, 23 July 2007 480 32 7605/08 ZDROBYLKO MYKOLA STEPANOVYCH, 1964 31 January 2008 Chervonograd Court, 20 May 2002 1,020 33 10939/08 KISELYOV GENNADIY VASILYEVICH, 1927 20 February 2008 Dniprovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 29 November 2006 405 34 12317/08 MIZINA VERA PETROVNA, 1940 15 February 2008 Novogrodivka Court, 16 February 2005 1,095 35 12930/08 RODCHENKO VLADIMIR PETROVICH, 1943 5 March 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 20 April 2005 1,095 36 14614/08 GNATENKO LYUDMILA NIKOLAYEVNA, 1965 3 March 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 10 June 2005, 31 August 2005 1,080 37 14617/08 KALIBERDA LYUBOV NIKOLAYEVNA, 1959 15 February2008 Slovyansk Court, 4 November 1997, 15 February 1999 and 25 April 2001 2,445 38 19253/08 SOLIMCHUK TARAS MYKOLAYOVYCH, 1955 8 April 2008 Goshcha Court, 18 January 2006 765 39 21204/08 BELIKOV ANATOLIY NIKOLAYEVICH, 1971 15 April 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 23 January 2002 1,680 40 23981/08 BARABASH NIKOLAY FILIPPOVICH, 1946 16 May 2008 Volodar Court, 15 November 2006 795 41 24401/08 PRAVDIKOVSKAYA LYUBOV VIKTOROVNA, 1937 30 April 2008 Kovpakiv Court, 10 March 2006 (amended by the Sumy Regional Court of Appeal on 11 May 2006) 930 42 27507/08 LOBODA ZINAIDA IVANOVNA, 1929 20 May 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 23 January 2002, 15 March 2006 945 43 27994/08 GALCHUN VITALIY GRIGORYEVICH, 1949 2 June 2008 Konotop Court, 23 July 2004, 25 June 2005 (the latter amended by the Sumy Regional Court of Appeal on 22 September 2005) 1,245 44 28106/08 AGUNOVICH ANATOLIY NIKOLAYEVICH, 1964 27 May 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 3 June 2002 1,485 45 28209/08 TKACHENKO NELYA ALEKSEYEVNA, 1964 27 May 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 18 July 2005 1,020 46 28215/08 FIRSTOV VIKTOR VITALYEVICH, 1959 27 May 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 29 January 2003, 29 May 2005 1,455 47 28228/08 YAROSHENKO SVETLANA STEPANOVNA, 1970 27 May 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 16 June 2005 1,035 48 29873/08 ZINCHENKO ANATOLIY ALEKSEYEVICH, 1949 9 June 2008 Marinskyy District Court of Donetsk Region, 22 December 2006 585 49 35512/08 ILYENKO IVAN PETROVICH, 1926 5 July 2008 Konotop Court, 17 September 2007 480 50 35527/08 ZASTAVSKIY ALEKSANDR IVANOVІСH, 1955 15 July 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 19 July 2002, 28 July 2003 (two judgments) 1,605 51 35539/08 AKIMENKO VLADIMIR YAKOVLEVICH, 1949 15 July 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 17 September 2003, 21 July 2004 and 10 August 2005 1,350 52 35567/08 NOVIKOVA TATYANA ALEKSANDROVNA, 1964 15 July 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 17 November 2005 960 53 39876/08 ANTIPOV NIKOLAY IVANOVICH, 1954 6 August 2008 Kostyantynivka Court, 11 March 2002 1,485 54 44564/08 SVIDERSKYY STEFAN IVANOVYCH, 1948 4 September 2008 Slovyansk Court, 6 October 1997, 24 May 2002 2,460 55 50250/08 KRUTOUZ OLEG NIKOLAYEVICH, 1965 6 October 2008 Novogrod Court, 8 June 2006 855 56 50771/08 YEVDOKIMENKO MIKHAIL YELISEYEVICH, 1939 6 October 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 2 March 2000, 12 February 2003 and 1 March 2007 (the latter amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal of 4   June   2007) 2,040 57 50833/08 YAKIMCHUK VALERIY ANATOLYEVICH, 1962 6 October 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 15 June 2005 1,080 58 53604/08 GANISHNYUK YEVGENIY VLADIMIROVICH, 1981 25 October 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 24 June 2005, 14 June 2007 1,035 59 53628/08 MOSKALENKO SERGEY VLADIMIROVICH (unspecified) 25 October 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 15 June 2005 1,065 60 53634/08 UDOVENKO IVAN DMITRIYEVICH, 1928 25 October 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 12 May 2005 1,095 61 55353/08 PRISTAY IVAN VASILYEVICH, 1965 27 October 2008 Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 17 December 2004 1,170 62 55361/08 SMIRNOV YURIY OLEGOVICH, 1948 23 July2008 Sosnivskyy District Court of Cherkasy, 20 January 2004 1,320 63 55622/08 FENYUK ANATOLIY DMYTROVYCH (unspecified) 5 November 2008 Glukhiv Court, 6 September 2005 1,035 64 56567/08 PINCHUK ANTONINA NIKOLAYEVNA, 1941 15 November 2008 1) Kostyantynivka Court, 29 November 2000, 12 June 2001 2) Commission on labour disputes, 19 February 2001, 15 May 2001 1,905 65 60784/08 KOZLOV SERGEY VIKTOROVICH, 1958 2 December 2008 Krasnyy Luch Court, 12 October 2004 1,155 66 9757/09 SHUMEYKO NATALYA PAVLOVNA, 1952 30 January2009 Svitlovodsk Court, 8 April 1999, 16 May 2007 2,190 67 17377/09 MASHKIN ANDRIY MYKHAYLOVYCH, 1936 10 March 2009 Sverdlovsk Court, 12 September 2003 1,230 68 18409/09 VASILENKO VALERIY ANDREYEVICH, 1947 23 March 2009 Kostyantynivka Court, 1 February 2001 1,875 69 19555/09 MEDVID PETRO VASYLYOVYCH, 1946 12 March 2009 Chervonograd Court, 27 November 2003 1,365 70 20683/09 ZAKHAROV VASILIY ANDREYEVICH, 1938 11 April 2009 Shakhtarsk Court, 12 March 2003, 10 June 2005, 1 December 2006 and 3 December 2008 1,455 71 26433/09 SAVCHENKO KONSTANTIN SERGEYEVICH, 1948 4 March 2009 Slovyansk Court, 5 October 2001 1,770 72 26444/09 SOKOLOVSKAYA YELENA PETROVNA, 1970 4 March 2009 1) Slovyansk Court, 29 September 1999, 4 May 2000 2) Commission on labour disputes, 1 September 2003 2,505 73 26446/09 SOLYANIK NIKOLAY FILIPPOVICH, 1932 4 March 2009 1) Slovyansk Court, 21 February 2000 2) Commission on labour disputes, 11 September 2000 2,070 74 27140/09 MEDVEDEV ALEKSANDR DMITRIYEVICH, 1955 28 April 2009 Lysychanskyy District Court of Lugansk, 12 February 2008 405 75 30626/09 GORYUNOV KONSTANTIN GENNADYEVICH, 1965 15 May 2009 Krasnyy Luch Court, 30 July 2001 1,770 76 31315/09 SHEVCHENKO LYUBOV IGNATYEVNA, 1938 2 June 2009 Krasnyy Luch Court, 17 May 2006 915 77 36429/09 ILCHENKO ANATOLIY MYKHAYLOVYCH, 1954 18 June 2009 Kyiv City Court of Appeal, 22 May 2006 915 78 37154/09 TOLKACHEV VIKTOR PETROVICH, 1954 24 June 2009 Antratsyt Court, 20 June 2006 900 79 37270/09 GANZHENKO OLGA GRYGORIVNA, 1958 24 June 2009 Lysychansk Court, 7 February 2005 1,110 80 49316/09 SIRA OLENA MYKOLAYIVNA, 1960 1 September 2009 Zolochivsk Court, 31 July 2007 585 81 1761/10 BOLYAK NIKOLAY TIMOFEYEVICH, 1947 28 December 2009 Proletarskyy District Court of Donetsk, 30 July 2008 525 82 10105/10 KLIMENCHUK VIKTOR STEPANOVICH, 1957 11 April 2009 Marganets Court, 15 February 2000 1,980