CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 19 juin 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sE5338F84 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s8934192D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sC35ADBE4 { width:190.96pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s9296A950 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s25B97BCD { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .s8EB571EB { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s265AD245 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .s1B9314DE { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .s581CA061 { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s2074955B { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s85CAF366 { margin-left:17.85pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sD85BBB70 { width:24.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sC3E07CE2 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s68FE8614 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle } .s387D3C78 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:top } .sC7606FBC { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:top } .s4E9C9A20 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle } .s274DF9F9 { margin-left:11.52pt; padding-left:6.33pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s4366C4C0 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle } .sD68C3E0C { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding:2.48pt; vertical-align:middle }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 47324/08 Milan GOGIĆ against Serbia and 8 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 19   June 2012 as a committee composed of:   András Sajó, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged between 22 September 2008 and 2 December 2009, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE All of the applicants are Serbian nationals (for additional personal details see the appended table). The applicants in cases nos. 13989/09, 15709/09 and 50213/09 were represented before the Court by Mr S. Gajić, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants in cases nos. 14221/09, 66875/09 and 66881/09 were represented before the Court by Ms Š. Dolovac while the applicant in case no. 57286/11 was represented before the Court by Ms   R.   Garibović. Both lawyers are practising in Novi Pazar. The applicant in case no. 47324/08 did not have a representative before the Court. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr S. Carić. Relying on various Articles of the Convention, the applicants complained about the respondent State’s failure to fully enforce final court decisions rendered in their favour against different socially/State-owned companies. The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the appended table. Between 8 November 2011 and 27 February 2012 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them the amounts specified in the appended table to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government will pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present case (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list pursuant to Article 39 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Françoise Elens-Passos   András Sajó Deputy Registrar President APPENDIX No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant name date of birth place of residence Final domestic decision (issuing authority / case no., adopted on) Company name and seat   Enforcement order (enforcement authority, case no. date of order) Friendly settlement amount                      47324/08 22/09/2008 Milan GOGIĆ 16/12/1951 Kragujevac   Municipal Court in Kragujevac 2P-XXVI-7/97 of 7 May 2002 DP IM “Crvena Zvezda”, Kragujevac Enforcement requested in the insolvency proceedings   ( potraživanje prijavljeno u stečajnom postupku ) Commercial Court in Kragujevac (I St. 1079/02 of 25/08/2003) 6,200 euros                    60896/08 08/12/2008 Mejrema ŠERIFOVIĆ 01/09/1953 Novi Pazar   1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 496/04 of 28 September 2004 2. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.1187/04 of 23 December 2004 “Pamučna predionica”, DOO Novi Pazar 1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 235/05 of 29/08/2005 2. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 980/05 of 26/09/2005 3,600 euros                    13989/09 24/02/2009 Radoslav RISTIĆ 23/07/1965 Beograd   II Municipal Court in Belgrade XIII-P. 2152/04 of 29 October 2004 Ivan Milutinović - PIM AD, Beograd IV Municipal Court in Belgrade XIV-61/05 of 21 January 2005 4,400 euros                    14221/09 23/02/2009 Božana PUZOVIĆ 08/09/1967 Novi Pazar   1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 1188/06 of 09 July 2007 2. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 1192/06 of 23 November 2007 “Raška” Holding Kompanija AD, Novi Pazar Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 1614/07 of 11/10/2007 2. I. 10/08 of 14 /01/2008 3,600 euros                    15709/09 06/03/2009 Srboljub STAMENKOVIĆ 15/05/1962 Beograd   II Municipal Court in Belgrade XXX-P. 2441/2003 of 08 September 2003 Ivan Milutinović - PIM AD, Beograd IV Municipal Court in Belgrade I-VIII-1131/03 of 15/12/2003   4,400 euros                    50213/09 08/09/2009 Stevan SUŠIĆ 20/02/1955 Ostružnica   II Municipal Court in Belgrade XXVII. P. 945/08 of 10 March 2008 and 11 July 2008 (decision on costs) Ivan Milutinović - PIM AD, Beograd IV Municipal Court in Belgrade XIV-I-14605/08 of 25/12/2008 The applicant’s enforcement request of 31/08/2008 was dismissed due to the restructuring of the company 3,720 euros                    66875/09 02/12/2009 Gvozdena SEKULIĆ 06/04/1952 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 379/07 of 9 July 2007 “Raška” “Pamučna predionica”, DOO, Novi Pazar Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I-1859/07 of 12/12/2007 3,600 euros                    66881/09 02/12/2009 Milanka ŠARAC 04/07/1952 Novi Pazar   1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 905/04 of 27 September 2004 2. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 1153/06 of 10 April 2007   “Raška” –Viskozna predionica, Novi Pazar 1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 335/05 of 23/06/2005 1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1166/07 of 31/05/2007   3,600 euros   57286/11 20/08/2009 Šeha IMAMOVIĆ 11/10/1956 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 1214/98 of 12 November 1998 2. P1. 170 /03 of 20 February 2004 3. P1   738/06 of 10 May 2006 “Raška” “Holding Kompanija”, Novi Pazar, Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 566/04 of 28/06/2004 2. I. 1013/05 of 26/09/2005 3. I. 1221/07 of 04/06/2007 2,600 euros