CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 juillet 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5E698226 { width:12.01pt; display:inline-block } .s50205432 { width:148.59pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s9296A950 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .s13151276 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s2FF27C9A { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#339966; display:none } .s69FEEB1D { width:94.08%; border-collapse:collapse } .s29BA263B { height:22.5pt } .s813F7A2B { width:11.3%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s38949A25 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; font-size:8pt } .s32434058 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; display:none } .sCC47E0D2 { width:35.34%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s95181CBA { width:22%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s58AC4C29 { width:26.38%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s8DD1D08A { vertical-align:top } .sB5A0042D { height:7.5pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sCBD96207 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s48941B3D { width:6.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB944F743 { display:none } .sAA9ED89C { width:26.38%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s34D8A36F { width:26.38%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sED2FFA7C { width:1.88pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sE2524784 { width:26.38%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA91C8AC { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24C65525 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9538EC41 { height:0pt } .s210BDA24 { width:40.25pt } .s4BF7B22 { width:125.9pt } .s69A03CF1 { width:78.4pt } .s7E4B6A19 { width:94pt } .s39493D56 { width:17.75pt }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 44256/08 Aleksandr Ivanovich BYATENKOV and others against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3 July 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Erik Møse, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 July 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are twenty-seven Russian nationals living in the Sysolskiy District of the Komi Republic. Their names and years of birth are tabulated below. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. On the dates tabulated below the Justice of the Peace of the Sysolskiy Court Circuit of the Komi Republic by separate judgments ordered a municipal unitary enterprise “Sysolskoye proizvodstvennoye obyedineniye “Zhilkomkhoz” («МУП «Сысольское производственное объединение «Жилкомхоз» ) to pay the applicants salary arrears. The awards remained unenforced. The applicants complained under Articles 6   § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 about non-enforcement of the final domestic court judgments in their favour. On 18   May 2011 the Court communicated the case to the respondent Government under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court. By letter of 21 September 2011 the applicants were invited to submit, by 23   November 2011, their comments on the Government’s observations, together with any claims for just satisfaction. The applicants did not reply. By letter dated 20 January 2012 sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of the observations had expired on 23   November 2011 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicants do not intend to pursue the application. As it follows from the acknowledgment-of-receipt card which returned to the Court, on 21   February 2012 Mr Kiryakov, the applicant who acted as contact person for the others applicants in the present case, received the strike-out warning. No response followed. THE LAW Having regard to the correspondence with the applicants, the Court finds that they may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   André Wampach   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos   Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX     The applicants’ names Year of birth Final domestic judgment       Aleksandr Ivanovich BYATENKOV 1951 31/08/2006, in force as of 15/09/2006       Mikhail Mikhaylovich GLAVINSKIY 1968         Yelena Vasilyevna BERSENEVA 1954         Pavel Georgiyevich BERSENEV 1955         Anatoliy Fedorovich TIFOY 1967         Dmitriy Viktorovich YELKIN 1979         Aleksandr Alekseyevich MALTSEV 1966         Vladimir Aleksandrovich PINZAR 1971         Sergey Aleksandrovich PUNEGOV 1977     Aleksandr Nikolayevich KIRYAKOV 1965     Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SHERSTYUKOV 1965     Dmitriy Mikhaylovich LAPAYEV 1977     Valentina Feliksovna KARMANOVA 1959     Marina Geliosovna NOSKOVA 1955     Aleksandra Panteleymonovna KOROSTYLEVA 1956     Yelena Fedorovna NOSKOVA 1956     Olga Vitalyevna SEMENCHINA 1969     Aleksandr Ivanovich LAPSHIN 1961     Natalya Pavlovna BERSENEVA 1975     Vitaliy Aleksandrovich SOLOMATIN 1972 31/08/2006, in force as of 15/09/2006   Konstantin Anatolyevich SELKOV 1970 19/10/2006, in force as of 31/10/2006   Petr Sergeyevich KOROSTYLEV 1959     Vyacheslav Nikolayevich MOROKHIN 1982     Ivan Alekseyevich KARMANOV 1964     Valeriy Nikolayevich SEMENCHIN 1965     Valeriy Stepanovich SAINSUS 1956     Igor Vladimirovich LEBED 1956 16/05/2006, in force as of 16/08/2006