CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 10 juillet 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sFC1B4D41 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; font-size:14pt } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s9D7F0777 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s68A4A370 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sB2EDE122 { width:158.28pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .sC202EACC { clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s26756D70 { height:49.85pt } .s7011202D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBF1DB780 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .s5A59F4F9 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s39AE3A85 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle; background-color:#e6e6e6 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s85CAF366 { margin-left:17.85pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sD85BBB70 { width:24.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3281263B { height:27.5pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 50045/08 Esad ĆOROVIĆ against Serbia and 8 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 10 July 2012 as a Committee composed of:   András Sajó, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged between 25 September 2008 and 11 October 2008, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE All of the applicants are Serbian nationals (for additional personal details see the appended table). They were represented before the Court by Mr   A.   Hadžibulić, a lawyer practising in Novi Pazar. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   S.   Carić. Relying on Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complained about the respondent State’s failure to fully enforce final court decisions rendered in their favour against different socially/State-owned companies. The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the appended table. Between 21 November 2011 and 23 May 2012 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them the amounts specified in the appended table to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government will pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present case (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list pursuant to Article 39 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Françoise Elens-Passos   András Sajó   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence Final domestic decision (issuing authority / case no., adopted on) and enforcement order (enforcement authority, case no. , date of order) Company name and seat   Friendly settlement amount                    50045/08 25/09/2008 Esad ĆOROVIĆ 04/06/1958 Novi Pazar Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 180/05 of 18 August 2005   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1557/05 of 6/01/2006   “Tkačnica 14. Avgust” DOO Novi Pazar 2,100 euros                    50082/08 25/09/2008 Mera SINANOVIĆ 23/09/1967 Novi Pazar Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 37/05 of 18 August 2005   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1709/05 of 6/01/2006   “Vigonj” Predionica DOO Novi Pazar 2,100 euros                    50085/08 25/09/2008 Atifa MULIĆ 01/10/1946 Novi Pazar Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 1161/04 of 24 December 2004   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 985/05 of 26/09/2005   “Tkačnica 14. Avgust” DOO Novi Pazar 2,100 euros                    50089/08 25/09/2008 Mera HABIBOVIĆ 18/08/1959 Novi Pazar     Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 51/05 of 28 March 2005   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I.1875/05 of 27/12/2005 “Raška” Holding Kompanija AD-“Predionica 28 Novembar” Novi Pazar 2,100 euros                    50624/08 11/10/2008 Šehida LIČINA 28/05/1950 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 643/04 of 3 November 2004   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1137/04 of 21/02/2005   “Vigonj” Predionica DOO Novi Pazar 2,600 euros                    58476/08 07/10/2008 Hajrija AVDOVIĆ 25/05/1965 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.643/04 of 3 November 2004   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1137/04 of 21/02/2005   “Vigonj” Predionica DOO Novi Pazar 2,600 euros                    58478/08 07/10/2008 Redžep GUSINAC 02/02/1957 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.643/04 of 3 November 2004   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1137/04 of 21/02/2005   “Vigonj” Predionica DOO Novi Pazar 2,600 euros                    58482/08 07/10/2008 Mahija HODŽIĆ 07/10/1956 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.643/04 of 3 November 2004   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1137/04 of 21/02/2005   “Vigonj” Predionica DOO Novi Pazar 2,600 euros                    58487/08 07/10/2008 Vasvija DOLOVAC 10/02/1957 Novi Pazar   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.643/04 of 3 November 2004   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1137/04 of 21/02/2005   “Vigonj” Predionica DOO Novi Pazar 2,600 euros