CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 septembre 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s40E9DAE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s988F61DE { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s3E2DB4A0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sFD4D42B6 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s6477A72F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA1CDB767 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sE5338F84 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5E698226 { width:12.01pt; display:inline-block } .s1558821B { width:179.6pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s2007D3CB { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sB83A7A02 { width:7.52%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEE972E32 { width:18.7%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s89988FC9 { width:17.3%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s5DAFE4E9 { width:34.06%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s5556A73B { width:22.4%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s2B7910CC { width:7.52%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s8DBD0BB9 { width:18.7%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2FA5ED18 { width:17.3%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA571E856 { width:34.06%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s81F25C2E { width:22.4%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sE8B29217 { page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sEDC5336B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s15514A1D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s4F37AD08 { width:7.52%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32F9308F { width:18.7%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6FDF68DC { width:17.3%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s36599C6 { width:34.06%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC2DEA536 { width:22.4%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 30351/06 Lyudmila Aleksandrovna VLASOVA and others against Russia and 32 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   September 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on dates tabulated in the appendix below, Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government on 22 September 2010 requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases and the applicants’ replies to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are one hundred and one Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated in the appendix below. Ms   Myasina (case no. 2409/07) is not represented in the proceedings before the Court. The rest of the applicants are represented by Mr I.V. Novikov, a lawyer practising in Novosibirsk. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.   Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. In the course of the proceedings, Ms Kuntseva (application no 5686/07) passed away. On 18 December 2011, a Chamber decided that Mr   N.V.   Kuntsev, who is the late applicant’s son, had standing to continue the proceedings before the Court in his late mother’s stead. The facts of the cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. All the applicants are pensioners. They successfully sued the pension authorities for miscalculating their pensions. Subsequently, on the authorities’ initiative, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Yakutiya quashed the final judgments by way of supervisory review to the applicants’ detriment on the ground of misinterpretation of the material law. COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 and Article   1 of Protocol   No.   1 about quashing of judgments in their favour by way of supervisory review. THE LAW The applicants complained about quashing of final and enforceable judgments in their favour by way of supervisory review. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 which, in so far as relevant, provide as follows: Article 6 § 1 of the Convention “In the determination of his [or her] civil rights and obligations [...], everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law [...]” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.” By letter dated 22 September 2010 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issue raised by the applications in all cases except for three applicants in   application no. 11884/07, namely Ms N.A. Dyachenko, Mr   M.N.   Dyachenko and Ms L.S. Sukhova. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention. In that declaration, the Government acknowledged the violation of the applicants’ rights under the Convention on account of the quashing of the binding judgments on the ground of misinterpretation of substantial law by way of supervisory review. The Government mentioned that the judgments in the applicants’ favour had been fully complied with prior to their quashing by way of supervisory review. The Government undertook to pay each applicant concerned 1,400 euros (EUR) as compensation for damage resulting from the violations mentioned above. The reminder of their declaration reads as follows: “The sum referred to above, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.” In a letter of 2 December 2010, the applicants represented by Mr   Novikov disagreed with the Government’s suggestion to strike their cases out, insisting on examination of their complaints. They seem to complain about the unlawful termination of payment of pensions at a rate fixed by the judgments in their favour. They pointed out that arrears on payment amounted to around 80,000 Russian roubles with regard to each applicant, without submitting any documents in support of this sum. In addition, they contested the amounts proposed by the Government for non ‑ pecuniary damage. In a letter of 13 November 2010, Ms Myasina indicated that the Government still had judgment debt, without submitting any documents in support of this allegation. The Court recalls that Article 37 of the Convention provides that it may at any stage of the proceedings decide to strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to one of the conclusions specified under (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 of that Article. Article   37 §   1   (c) enables the Court in particular to strike a case out of its list if: “for any other reason established by the Court, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application”. It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1(c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued. To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see, Tahsin Acar v.   Turkey (preliminary issue) [GC], no.   26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spółka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.) no.   28953/03, 18 September 2007). Turning to the Government’s unilateral declarations, the Court observes that the judgments providing the applicants with an enforceable claim were quashed by way of supervisory review. The Court is satisfied that the quashing of binding and enforceable judgments in the applicants’ favour is explicitly acknowledged by the Government as violating the Convention. As regards the pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants, the Court notes that according to the Government, the judgments in the applicants’ favour were fully executed prior to their quashing. The Government provided documents supporting those payments. As far as the applicants’ replies to the declaration can be understood as contesting the fact of those payments, the Court cannot accept this argument as they did not provide any documentary evidence. Thus it admits that the judgments in the applicants’ favour were fully enforced by the Russian authorities until the moment of their quashing. The Court recalls that after the final judgments were quashed they ceased to exist under domestic law; it cannot restore the power of these judgments nor assume the role of the national authorities in awarding social benefits for the future (see, among other authorities, Tarnopolskaya and Others v.   Russia , nos. 11093/07 et al., § 51, 7 July 2009). Consequently, no pecuniary awards for the periods after the quashing could be legitimately claimed by the applicants before the Court. As far as compensation for the non-pecuniary damage is concerned, the Court notes that the relevant sums offered by the Government are comparable with Court’s awards in similar cases (see Ryabov and 151 other “Privileged pensioners” cases v. Russia , nos. 4563/07 et al., § 23, 17   December 2009, and Streltsov and other “Novocherkassk military pensioners” cases v. Russia , nos. 8549/06 et al., § 96, 29 July 2010). Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the Government’s declarations, as well as the amounts of compensation proposed – which are consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications (Article 37 § 1(c)). In light of the above considerations, and given also the clear and extensive case-law on the topic (see, for example, Kulkov and Others v.   Russia , nos. 25114/03 et al., 8 January 2009, and Pugach and Others v.   Russia , nos. 31799/08 et al., 4 November 2010), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the applications (Article 37 § 1 in fine ). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list, except for the case of Ms N.A. Dyachenko, Mr M.N. Dyachenko and Ms   L.S. Sukhova (application no. 11884/07). As regards Ms N.A. Dyachenko, Mr M.N. Dyachenko and Ms   L.S.   Sukhova who are the applicants in application no. 11884/07, the Court notes that the judgments in their favour have been quashed on 27   July 2006 and the applicants lodged their application on 9 February 2007. Nothing in the applicants’ submissions indicates that they were not immediately aware of the ruling. It follows that the part of application no.   11884/07 concerning these applicants is introduced out of time and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Sardin v. Russia (dec.), no. 69582/01, ECHR 2004 ‑ II). For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declarations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein with regard to all applicants except for Ms N.A. Dyachenko, Mr   M.N. Dyachenko and Ms L.S. Sukhova (application no. 11884/07); Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, except for application no.   11884/07 with regard to Ms N.A. Dyachenko, Mr   M.N. Dyachenko and Ms L.S. Sukhova; Decides to declare inadmissible application no. 11884/07 with regard to Ms N.A. Dyachenko, Mr M.N. Dyachenko and Ms L.S. Sukhova in accordance with Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.   André Wampach   Peer Lorenzen   Deputy Registrar   President No. Application No. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Compensation offered (EUR)   30351/06 17/06/2006 Lyudmila Aleksandrovna VLASOVA 05/11/1948 Neryungri   Nadezhda Leonidovna MERZLYAKOVA 18/09/1950 Neryungri   Nina Mikhaylovna BARNOVSKAYA 14/03/1949 Neryungri   Valentina Borisovna MANZANOVA 05/11/1945 Neryungri   Aida Ivanovna MERKULOVA 02/01/1930 Neryungri   Yevgeniy Ivanovich AGARKOV 12/01/1946 Neryungri   Aleksandr Pavlovich DOROZHKOV 20/09/1950 Neryungri   Valentina Andreyevna MILOVANOVA 15/12/1944 Neryungri   Tatyana Pavlovna BROVTSYNA 23/07/1945 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   30353/06 17/06/2006 Ivan Pavlovich BOSIKOV 15/06/1946 Neryungri   Valentina Vasilyevna RYABOVA 15/11/1945 Neryungri   Ivan Sergeyevich POCHATOVSKIY 04/07/1947 Neryungri   Valentina Fedorovna POCHATOVSKAYA 15/06/1950 Neryungri   Valentina Petrovna KUPTSOVA 03/09/1951 Neryungri   Vera Fedorovna VISHNEVSKAYA 24/02/1948 Neryungri   Lyudmila Viktorovna TSVETKOVA 01/04/1952 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   33264/06 17/06/2006 Lyubov Vasilyevna TANKOVID 16/07/1951 Neryungri   Marina Petrovna PODLESNAYA 09/10/1952 Nerungri   Aleksandr Panteleymonovich SHIRYAYEV 22/04/1947 Neryungri   Zinaida Vadimovna SHIRYAYEVA 07/11/1946 Neryungri   Lyubov Dubdanovna AYUROVA 05/12/1952 Neryungri   Nikolay Vasilyevich ALEKSANDROV 03/01/1946 Neryungri   Galina Yuryevna SEDIK 23/01/1950 Neryungri   Anna Nikolayevna PODGORNAYA 30/03/1951 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   33269/06 17/06/2006 Tatyana Kuzminichna AZYAZOVA 19/08/1951 Neryungri   Aleksey Stepanovich BALYKIN 10/04/1949 Neryungri   Valentina Semenovna BALYKINA 27/06/1945 Neryungri   Yevgeniya Dymbrenovna ZODBOYEVA 07/08/1945 Neryungri   Irina Viktorovna PETROVA 11/01/1939 Neryungri   Sofiya Konstantinovna TOTSKAYA 01/08/1946 Neryungri   Vladimir Vasilyevich TOTSKIY 02/03/1943 Neryungri   Vitaliy Dmitriyevich CHUKURNA 12/01/1931 Neryungri   Valentina Fedorovna CHUKURNA 15/04/1940 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   47938/06 28/10/2006 Viktor Vasilyevich KRAYNEV 11/08/1939 Neryungri   Vera Nikolayevna KRAYNEVA 15/04/1937 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   47939/06 28/10/2006 Shamil Magafurovich ZAMALUTDINOV 21/07/1949 Neryungri   Galina Vasilyevna KROKHMAL 17/08/1954 Neryungri   Yekaterina Andreyevna BOKLAG 18/04/1957 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   49256/06 15/11/2006 Vladimir Aleksandrovich KHAKHULIN 09/09/1948 Neryungri   Galina Trofimovna VERBITSKAYA 12/03/1959 Neryungri 1,400 to each applicant   2409/07 11/12/2006 Vera Aleksandrovna MYASINA 03/04/1955 Novosibirsk   1,400   4590/07 11/12/2006 Gennadiy Petrovich GREDASOV 29/04/1949 Neryungri   1,400             5077/07 28/10/2006 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich GOLOVACH 11/09/1954 Neryungri   1,400             5391/07 22/10/2006 Fanziya Shakirovna GAZIMULLINA 14/05/1951 Neryungri   1,400             5461/07 11/12/2006 Mikhail Ivanovich YEFIMOV 21/02/1955 Neryungri   Viktoriya Nikolayevna VLASOVA 06/10/1954 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             5463/07 01/12/2006 Vera Grigoryevna POLIKARPOVA 07/11/1957 Neryungri   Valentina Mikhaylovna PESTEREVA 07/09/1953 Neryungri   Andrey Pavlovich PLASTOVETS 23/11/1948 Neryungri   Lidiya Spiridonovna KOROLKOVA 01/08/1952 Neryungri   Galina Vladimirovna MOSHINSKAYA 02/12/1954 Neryungri   Nina Yefimovna SHMAKOVA 13/11/1954 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             5646/07 11/12/2006 Vladimir Pertovich PUTINTSEV 04/01/1946 Neryungri   Olga Radionovna PELIPAS 17/10/1949 Neryungri   Valentina Pavlovna BORISENKO 15/12/1939 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             5686/07 11/12/2006 Yelena Vasilyevna KUNTSEVA 12/10/1954 Neryungri   1,400 [1]             7311/07 25/01/2007 Petr Ivanovich NESKOROMNYKH 11/06/1949 Neryungri   1,400             7832/07 26/01/2007 Valentina Mikhaylovna KOMISSAROVA 18/11/1949 Neryungri   Yelena Nikolayevna NIKOLAYEVA 09/01/1947 Neryungri 1,400 to each applicant             7848/07 26/01/2007 Galina Mikhaylovna BELYAK 05/03/1954 Neryungri   1,400             10135/07 08/02/2007 Anatoliy Vissarionovich ALEKSEYEV 28/11/1943 Neryungri   Anatloy Ivanovich KOSHKAROVSKIY 10/07/1941 Neryungri   Zinaida Ivanovna KULKOVA 10/04/1946 Neryungri   Lyudmila Pavlovna MOLODTSOVA 05/05/1953 Neryungri   Anna Avtomonovna SELIVERSTOVA 17/12/1952 Neryungri   Vasiliy Ivanovich SHCHEGOLSKIY 29/03/1955 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             10137/07 11/02/2007 Viktor Ostafiyevich SIDORENKO 06/02/1950 Neryungri   1,400             10138/07 09/02/2007 Nina Vladimirovna MONAKHOVA 27/03/1960 Neryungri   1,400             11331/07 05/02/2007 Lyubov Petrovna REZIKOVA 27/06/1954 Neryungri   Galina Nikiforovna BATSA 27/01/1955 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             11884/07 09/02/2007 Lyudmila Ivanovna ROMANYUK 05/01/1955 Neryungri   Olga Bayevna ABILDINOVA 01/01/1952 Neryungri   Lidiya Denisovna SALEYEVA 01/09/1948 Neryungri   Nadezhda Arkadyevna DYACHENKO 25/03/1954 Neryungri   Mikhail Nikolayevich DYACHENKO 06/11/1948 Neryungri   Lidiya Sergeyevna SUKHOVA 13/01/1954 Neryungri   1,400 to the first three applicants             11914/07 05/02/2007 Valentina Sidorovna BORZENKOVA 24/12/1952 Neryungri   Valentina Vasilyevna DUMBROVSKAYA 12/02/1946 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             11919/07 05/02/2007 Zoya Viktorovna ALESHKINA 15/03/1949 Neryungri   Olga Gennadyevna BURAKOVA 15/07/1948 Neryungri   Yuriy Grigoryevich BURAKOV 14/07/1944 Neryungri   Zhanna Vitalyevna ZAKHAROVA 15/02/1967 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             17137/07 21/03/2007 Nadezhda Viktorovna BODNAR 10/10/1953 Neryungri   Nina Nikolayevna SHIBKA 27/11/1955 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             17140/07 21/03/2007 Minzilya Miniakhmetovna KAMALOVA 09/08/1962 Neryungri   Rafit Rashitovich KAMALOV 01/01/1958 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             17145/07 21/03/2007 Tamara Ivanovna KORCHASHKINA 17/07/1949 Neryungri   1,400             17644/07 15/03/2007 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich GUSEV 15/12/1954 Neryungri   Yuriy Anatolyevich ROMANENKO 14/11/1954 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             17645/07 15/03/2007 Valentina Petrovna YEROKHINA 24/03/1958 Neryungri   1,400             27386/07 08/06/2007 Vladimir Anatolyevich BADULIN 21/02/1936 Nerungri   Valentina Fedorovna BADULINA 30/10/1937 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             3361/08 04/12/2007 Yuriy Borisovich ZHILYABIN 06/05/1941 Neryungri   Yekaterina Pavlovna ZHILYABINA 17/11/1942 Neryungri     Lyudmila Vasilyevna KLIMOVICH 13/03/1947 Neryungri   Galina Stepanovna NEZHINA 28/12/1950 Neryungri   Valentina Konstantinovna AKHMETOVA 19/09/1949 Neryungri   Zoya Ivanovna BURDA 25/11/1935 Neryungri   Raisa Nikitichna GANTIMUROVA 29/03/1940 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant             10611/08 28/12/2007 Galina Nikolayevna PUNTUSOVA 03/10/1951 Neryungri   Aleksandr Yakovlevich PUNTUSOV 03/11/1950 Neryungri   1,400 to each applicant   [1] This amount is to be paid to Mr Kuntsev Nikita Vitalyevich