CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 septembre 2012
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC003206607
- Date
- 18 septembre 2012
- Publication
- 18 septembre 2012
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5E698226 { width:12.01pt; display:inline-block } .s1558821B { width:179.6pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 32066/07 Ruslan BASHIROV against Azerbaijan The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   September 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 July 2007, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Ruslan Jalil oglu Bashirov ( Ruslan Cəlil oğlu Bəşirov ), is an Azerbaijani national, who was born in 1978 and lives in Zardab. He was represented before the Court by Mr I.   Ashurov, a lawyer practising in Baku. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç.   Asgarov. The applicant complained, inter alia , under Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention about the conditions of his detention, alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him and alleged breach of his right to the presumption of innocence. On 31 August 2011 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above. On 16 January 2012 the Government submitted to the Registry their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application. These were forwarded on 19 January 2012 to the applicant, who was invited to submit observations in reply by 1 March 2012. By a letter of 23 March 2012 the applicant personally informed the Court that he wished to withdraw the application as he had been pardoned by a presidential decree of 16 March 2012 and released from prison. By a letter of 27 April 2012 the Court requested the applicant’s representative to confirm, by 25 May 2012, the applicant’s wish to withdraw the application. This letter was received at the applicant’s representative’s office on 10 May 2012. No response has been received. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   André Wampach   Peer Lorenzen   Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 18 septembre 2012
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC003206607
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral