CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 25 septembre 2012

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2C683D28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD5DF731 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE5338F84 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .s7714A00D { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-align:justify } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sBAA06C68 { width:13.67pt; display:inline-block } .s5B12D80C { width:187.62pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .sC202EACC { clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sF9E78466 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:center } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7E0F3F91 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3C2CFC22 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s684B547D { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34911/04 Sergey Yevgenyevich ABASHYN against Ukraine and 4 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 25   September 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   André Potocki,   Paul Lemmens, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on various dates specified in the appendix, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants are Ukrainian nationals whose personal details are set out in the appendix. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy, of the Ministry of Justice. The applicants lodged the applications with the Court while they were being detained in the context of their criminal prosecution.   According to the material submitted by the Government, the applicants were subsequently released from detention (for details see the appendix). The applicants mainly complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against them had been unfair. Mr Abashyn and Mr   Zubenko further complained under Article 3 of the Convention that they had been tortured by the police during the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings. Mr Zubenko also complained that his pre-trial detention had been contrary to Article 5 of the Convention. Relying on Article 34 of the Convention, the applicants complained that they were not able to obtain copies of documents from the domestic case files to submit them in support of their complaints before the Court. Mr   Zubenko also alleged that the dispatch of his letters to the Court was often delayed by the prison authorities and that the conditions of his detention worsened (in particular as regards the limitation on daily exercise) because of his complaints to the Court. The applicants also raised other complaints under the Convention. On 22 June 2011 the applicants’ complaints under Articles 3, 5, 6 and 34 of the Convention were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received from the applicants. The applicants also did not reply to the Court’s letters of 23 May 2012 warning the applicants of the possibility that their cases might be struck out of the Court’s list pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. With the exception of Mr Urozhok, the Court’s letters were sent by registered post to the applicants’ permanent addresses, as indicated in their application forms. The letter to Mr Urozhok was sent to the detention centre where he had been detained during the criminal proceedings against him, as he had given no alternative address for corresponding with the Court. According to the acknowledgement of receipt slips, the Court’s letters of 23 May 2012 were delivered to Mr Zubenko and Mr   Danchenko on 31 May and 15   June 2012 respectively. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their common factual and legal background. The Court further considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.   Stephen Phillips   Mark Villiger   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth   Released from detention   34911/04 05/08/2004 Sergey Yevgenyevich ABASHYN 10/08/1955   23/05/2007   39160/05 13/10/2005 Yuriy Vladimirovich KALGA 29/07/1967   17/08/2009   14045/06 27/03/2006 Anatoliy Anatolyevich ZUBENKO 20/12/1976   October 2009 (the exact date is unknown)   35565/06 17/08/2006 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich DANCHENKO 24/04/1977   22/08/2007   22258/08 10/04/2008 Ruslan Vagirovich UROZHOK 23/07/1981   21/01/2011