CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 17 janvier 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sC443675D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD2857263 { margin-top:30pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s401C450A { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9F223FEE { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s40E9DAE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s988F61DE { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s3E2DB4A0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s281358E1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s8A9F351B { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s804EF768 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s7EE1C8F0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE839AF00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; line-height:13.5pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s2F515CFB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; line-height:13.5pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s11869A80 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s8E011338 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s56E27C8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sD6E2332A { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s308FBE0C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .s48DB3670 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s86439055 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sB81E279F { width:179.94pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s6108529E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s32ABB12B { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s97028CF8 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s5B8637C { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s66B907F7 { margin-left:36pt; text-indent:-21.34pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s9906F6F2 { width:7.66pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB673203C { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sED1A34C5 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sE30DC55F { margin-left:36pt; text-indent:-23.56pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1EA98943 { width:5.44pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sCC018295 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s29BE6C23 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s78B6B604 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sCEE978D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s4E34B50A { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s1C2B10C2 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s23CD0580 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s88A4DB4E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sDD8F0D07 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6A269875 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s11BEB50D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sEAD70FA9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s241BF43A { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s3133A7C8 { font-family:Arial; color:#0069d6 }     FIFTH SECTION           CASE OF ROBOTA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE   (Application no. 7158/04 and 88 other applications)                     JUDGMENT   This version was rectified on 4 March 2013 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court   STRASBOURG   17 January 2013       This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Robota v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,   Ann Power-Forde,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 December 2012, Having noted that the underlying question in the applications is already the subject of well-established case-law of the Court and that the parties had the ample opportunity to comment on it and on any other aspects of the case, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in 89 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 90 Ukrainian nationals and companies based in Ukraine, whose details are specified in the annexed tables (“the applicants”). 2.     In the course of the proceedings Ms N. Khaknazarova (application no.   61133/08) died; her husband, Mr O. Khaknazarov, and her daughter, Ms   O. Khaknazarova, expressed the wish to pursue the application. 3.     The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr N. Kultchytskyy, of the Ministry of Justice. 4.     The applications, which mainly concern the issues of lengthy non-enforcement of domestic decisions given in the applicants’ favour, were communicated to the Government on various dates. The Government have submitted observations concerning some of the applications. Having been initially adjourned in accordance with the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov pilot judgment (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, ECHR 2009 ‑ ... (extracts)), the proceedings in the applications were resumed in February 2012 (for further details see Kharuk and others v. Ukraine [Committee], no.703/05, §§ 4-6, 26 July 2012) 5.     On various dates the Government submitted to the Court unilateral declarations concerning all the present applications, and requested the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases pursuant to Article 37 §   1   (c) of the Convention on the basis of the declarations. The Court examined the declarations and decided to reject the Government’s requests. THE FACTS I.     Non-enforcement issues 6.     On the dates set out in the annexed tables domestic courts and commissions on labour disputes delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts and/or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time because of the authorities’ failure to take specific budgetary or regulatory measures, of the introduction of bans on the attachment and sale of property belonging to State-owned or controlled companies, or because of the bailiffs’ omissions. II.     Other matters 7.     Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 8.     In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issues raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 9.     The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Articles   6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No. 1 which read, in so far as relevant, as follows: Article 6 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] tribunal ...” Article 13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law ... Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.” A.     Admissibility 10.     The Court notes that the applicants’ above complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 11.     The Court notes that the decisions in the applicants’ favour remained unenforced for lengthy periods of time, for which the authorities were responsible. 12.     The Court reiterates that it has already found violations of   the Convention in   similar   cases (see Kharuk and others , cited above, §§ 17-19). 13.     Having examined all the material in its possession, the Court finds no fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion in the present cases. 14.     There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour and a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement. III.     OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 15.     Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 16.     It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. IV.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 17.     Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” A.     Damage, costs, and expenses 18.     In line with the approach applied in Kharuk and others (cited above, §§ 23-27), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000   euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non-enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Annex 1) and EUR   1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Annex 2). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses. 19.     The Court further notes that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the decisions which have not been enforced. B.     Default interest 20.     The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Declares the applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   4.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   5.     Holds (a)     that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which have not been enforced and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix   2 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 17   January 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX 1 (non-enforcement delays more than three years)   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant’s name and date of birth (if known) Enforceable domestic decisions        7158/04 09/01/2004 Anna Ilyinichna ROBOTA 13/02/1949 12/04/2001, Bagliyskyy District Court of Dnipropetrovsk   09/12/2004, Bagliyskyy District Court of Dnipropetrovsk        31923/04 25/08/2004 Oleg Mykolayovych KUTSENKO 28/11/1959 23/03/2001, Bagliyskiy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk   15/03/2004, Bagliyskiy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk        38211/04 12/10/2004 LABORATORY FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ECONOMIC PLANNING. PP 18/12/2000, Higher Arbitration Court        12239/05 21/03/2005 BRIVT, MPP 05/09/2002, Commercial Court of Sumy Region        23753/05 16/06/2005 LAZURNYY BEREG, TOV 13/07/2000, Crimea Commercial Court 21/12/2001, Crimea Commercial Court 21/12/2001, Crimea Commercial Court 21/12/2001, Crimea Commercial Court        33109/05 19/08/2005 Tatyana Anatolyevna LEZHNEVA 1959 17/02/2003, Pavlograd Court        35928/05 22/09/2005 1) Aleksandr Vasilyevich NAZARENKO 15/11/1963   2) Vasiliy Dmitriyevich LAZAREV 24/12/1953 1) 21/03/2000, Hartzyzsk Court 2) 09/03/2000, Hartzyzk Court        44158/05 21/11/2005 Valeriy Aleksandrovich POKHODOSHCHUK 29/07/1956 15/03/2005, Sevastopol Harrison Court 13/06/2005,Sevastopol Harrison Court 21/06/2007, Gagarinskyy District Court of Sevastopol        2590/06 30/12/2005 Oleksandr Vasylyovych DUBONOS 19/08/1960 10/11/2003, Chervonograd Court       7492/06 01/02/2006 Aleksandr Mikhaylovich PROKOPENKO 25/05/1958 22/06/1999, Yenakieve Court 01/03/2001, Yenakieve Court       8658/06 22/02/2006 Aleksandr Grigoryevich GRABOVOY 12/02/1966 27/05/2005, Prymorskyy District Court of Odessa       19232/06 06/04/2006 Tetyana Volodymyrivna KRASNOSHAPKA 29/10/1963 12/08/2003, Lokhvytsya Court, as amended by the Poltava Regional Court of Appeal on 27/07/2005       23103/06 30/05/2006 Volodymyr Petrovych BOYANYTSKYY 25/11/1952 19/11/2003, Chervonograd Court       30682/06 06/07/2006 Roman Vasylyovych VORONKA 10/02/1958 19/11/2003, Chervonograd Court       32801/06 26/07/2006 Vladimir Ivanovich TELEGIN 03/01/1940 05/04/2004, Donetsk Regional Commercial Court       34380/06 01/08/2006 Viktoriya Dmytrivna SEMENOVA 12/02/1934 13/12/2004, Dzerzhynsk Court       35075/06 12/08/2006 Valentyn Pylypovych MIROSHNICHENKO 12/08/1954 26/06/2004, Dobropillya Court       36979/06 30/08/2006 SNEZHNYANSKIY ZAVOD KHIMICHNOGO MASHYNOBUDUVANNYA, VAT 24/10/2000, Zaporyzhzhya Regional Arbitration Court 07/06/2001, Donetsk Regional Arbitration Court 24/03/2005, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal       42929/06 07/09/2006 PROMETEY-2000, PP 14/04/2003, Kyiv City Commercial Court of Appeal       44612/06 24/10/2006 Yuriy Yuryevich STEPANOV 06/07/1972 16/01/2006, Sudak Court       45692/06 24/10/2006 Svetlana Yuryevna VYSKREBETS 05/10/1966 16/01/2006, Sudak Court       1082/07 11/12/2006 Svitlana Ilarionivna KOSTOGRYZ 03/02/1954 29/10/2002, Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, as amended on 18/03/2004 by the Poltava Regional Court of Appeal       2514/07 01/12/2006 Lyubov Ivanovna STEPANOVA 29/09/1944 16/01/2006, Sudak Court, as amended on 20/09/2006       4943/07 18/09/2006 Yuriy Stanislavovich MIZIN 18/05/1963 28/05/2005, Novogrodivka Court       7753/07 02/02/2007 Aleksandr Fyodorovich KUZMICH 11/03/1989 08/06/2005, Stanychno-Luganskyy Court       8135/07 02/02/2007 Mykola Frankovych MATUSEVYCH 27/05/1960 05/05/2005, Zhytomyr Harrison Court       10657/07 21/02/2007 Valentin Ivanovich SURATOV 10/06/1936 30/08/2006, Tokmak Court       12106/07 28/02/2007 Anatoliy Nikolayevich PRYADKO 17/06/1953 06/12/2000, Saksaganskyy District Court of Kryvyy Rig 12/12/2002, Saksaganskyy District Court of Kryvyy Rig       20094/07 11/04/2007 Viktor Sergeyevich BORDUN 15/02/1941 19/02/2001, Nova Kakhovka Court       21518/07 20/04/2007 Volodymyr Ivanovych GRYSHCHENKO 17/12/1941 08/04/2003, Gorlivka Court       22067/07 30/04/2007 Raisa Petrovna CHERNYSH 15/10/1958 17/11/1998, Nakhimovskiy District Court of Sevastopol, 02/08/1999, Nakhimovskiy District Court of Sevastopol 24/03/2005, Sevastopol Court of Appeal       22909/07 04/05/2007 Igor Yevgenovych RUSANOV 20/10/1962 21/11/2002, Mykytivskyy District Court of Gorlivka [1]       23977/07 16/05/2007 Vladimir Pavlovich DENISENKO 20/09/1949 07/02/2006, Nikopol Court       27445/07 18/06/2007 Vyacheslav Viktorovich ZHVAKIN 24/10/1949 21/12/1998, Yevpatoriya Court 29/11/2006, Yevpatoriya Court       28831/07 29/05/2007 REAL NK, PP 12/04/2005, Kherson Regional Commercial Court       29858/07 05/07/2007 Fyodor Fyodorovich GRECHKO 12/05/1951 12/06/2005, Primorskyy District Court of Odessa 10/07/2007, Primorskyy District Court of Odessa 19/10/2007, Primorskyy District Court of Odessa 23/07/2008, Primorskyy District Court of Odessa       30884/07 09/07/2007 Svetlana Konstantinovna LYSYUK 15/03/1956 19/12/2005, Donetsk Regional Commercial Court       33577/07 16/07/2007 Vasiliy Gavrilovich DOGOT 11/02/1960 25/12/2002, Chervonogvardiysk District Court of Makyiyvka       37285/07 16/08/2007 Valentina Mikhaylovna PASHINSKAYA 24/04/1941 23/10/2000, Novogrodivka Court       39220/07 27/08/2007 Sergey Sergeyevich SIVASHOV 01/03/1950 09/08/2002, Krasnyy Luch Court 27/10/2004, Krasnyy Luch Court 18/11/2004, Krasnyy Luch Court       39225/07 01/08/2007 Mikhail Aleksandrovich KAPUSTIN 31/07/1978 26/01/2006, Sudak Court       39564/07 29/08/2007 Aleksandr Pavlovich OZERYANSKIY 07/06/1949 18/04/2002, Krasnyy Luch Court 22/11/2004, Krasnyy Luch Court       41632/07 16/06/2007 Yuriy Ivanovich GAVRISHOV unspecified 07/12/2001,Yevpatoriya Court 29/06/2004, Yevpatoriya Town Court       41709/07 14/09/2007 Oleksandr Mykolayovych PYSARENKO 23/04/1958 05/10/2006, Lubny Court       48374/07 06/11/2007 Alla Vasilyevna KUCHINSKAYA 25/05/1949 20/09/1999, Ovruch Court       53239/07 23/11/2007 Sergey Nikolayevich MIKHNOVSKIY 21/09/1954 07/07/1997, Saksaganskiy District Court of Kryvyy Rih 08/07/1998, Saksaganskiy District Court of Kryvyy Rih 27/03/2001, Saksaganskiy District Court of Kryvyy Rih 03/02/2003, Saksaganskiy District Court of Kryvyy Rih       54478/07 19/11/2007 Volodymyr Dmytrovych BASHEY 02/04/1969 06/11/2001, Vugledar Court       795/08 10/12/2007 Mykhaylo Mykolayovych SHTAYER 15/05/1958 21/03/2003, Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court       1325/08 26/12/2007 Sergiy Mykhaylovych PAVLYUK 30/09/1962 21/05/2002, labour disputes commission 21/06/2002, Nova Kakhovka Court 19/02/2003, Nova Kakhovka Court       4851/08 16/01/2008 Valeriy Ananyevich GOLOVIN unspecified 14/05/2007, Feodosiya Court       14749/08 28/02/2008 Atanaziy Atanaziyovych STELMAKH 17/02/1956 02/03/2004, Chervonograd Court       17775/08 03/04/2008 Volodymyr Petrovych PAZYNICH 21/12/1955 25/05/2007, Oleksandria Court       18439/08 03/04/2008 Volodymyr Oleksandrovych BARSKYY 20/04/1956 06/07/2006, Golovanivsk Court       28976/08 07/06/2008 Ludmila Grigoryevna ALMIZOVA 09/02/1950 30/03/2007, Krasnyy Luch Court       28988/08 07/06/2008 Irina Sergeyevna MANDRIK 23/12/1963 21/05/2007, Krasnyy Luch Court       30306/08 11/06/2008 Lyudmila Grigoryevna MOTRICH 26/06/1953 11/12/2002, Dniprovskyy District Court of Kherson       30414/08 15/06/2008 Andriy Anatoliyovych IVANYSHCHUK 09/04/1977 23/09/2005, Suvorovskyy District Court of Kherson       33743/08 13/06/2008 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich SHALUN 20/06/1972 12/04/2005, Prymorskyy District Court of Odessa       34893/08 04/07/2008 Iryna Fedorivna KRASNIKOVA 13/10/1963 06/11/2001, Kirovskyy District Court of Kirovograd       35546/08 15/07/2008 Vasiliy Viktorovich VINOGRADOV 05/04/1948 18/05/2005, Krasnyy Luch Court       35552/08 15/07/2008 Valentina Ilinichna LICHUK 01/06/1937 16/06/2005, Krasnyy Luch Court 06/02/2006, Krasnyy Luch Court       36775/08 23/07/2008 Vladimir Mironovich NIKOLAYCHUK 22/07/1938 21/12/2006, Sosnivskyy District Court of Cherkasy       37105/08 17/06/2008 Yuriy Ashuriyevich RADZHABOV 06/10/1963 01/06/2005, Krasnyy Luch Court       39374/08 24/07/2008 Valentina Ivanovna RUSAK 01/01/1962 19/04/2006, Myrgorod Court       39562/08 06/08/2008 Vladimir Dmitriyevich BELOLAPOTKOV 27/04/1950 07/08/2006, Oleksandriya Court 16/11/2006, Oleksandriya Court       39703/08 11/06/2008 Georgiy Georgiyovych KARLOV 02/01/1947 18/12/2006, Leninskyy District Court of Mykolayiv       41601/08 22/08/2008 Yevgeniy Nikolayevich MOTYREV 27/10/1949 06/04/2007, Krasnyy Luch Court       46828/08 20/09/2008 Vitaliy Antanasovych PAULAUSKAS 31/01/1970 12/12/2006, Selydiv Court       49992/08 08/10/2008 Viktor Iosifovich GRIBOVSKIY 05/01/1951 18/08/2003, Nova Kakhovka Court 15/04/2005, Nova Kakhovka Court 14/04/2006, Nova Kakhovka Court 03/07/2008, Nova Kakhovka Court       51718/08 13/10/2008 Rashyd Teymur-Ogly MAMEDOV 16/02/1966 22/09/2005, Poltava Regional Court of Appeal       53622/08 25/10/2008 Vladimir Vasilyevich GANISHNYUK 19/01/1959 12/06/2002, Krasnyy Luch Court 24/06/2005, Krasnyy Luch Court 14/06/2007, Krtasnyy Luch Court       53647/08 25/10/2008 Valentina Petrovna BARABASH 16/06/1940 22/02/2002, Krasnyy Luch Court 15/10/2003, Krasnyy Luch Court 24/06/2005, Krasnyy Luch Court 24/06/2005, Krasnyy Luch Court 14/06/2007, Krasnyy Luch Court       54464/08 30/10/2008 Lyudmyla Vasylivna KOVAL 03/10/1958 07/12/2007, Vinnytsya Administrative Court       57381/08 17/11/2008 INTERKON, TOV 21/01/2003, Khmelnytskyy Regional Commercial Court       58299/08 04/11/2008 Aleksandr Vasilyevich BUDYLKO 17/04/1938 11/12/2007, Kupyansk Court       61133/08 06/12/2008 Natalya Volodymyrivna KHAKNAZAROVA 14/11/1961 30/05/07, Feodosiya Court 20/06/07, Feodosiya Court as amended by the Crimea Court of Appeal on 18/09/2007 and by the Supreme Court on 20/08/08 [2]       3062/09 29/12/2008 Viktor Ivanovich ZAMIUSSKIY 06/10/1957 17/09/2007, Antratsyt Court, amended by the Luhansk Regional Court of Appeal on 04/12/2007       3279/09 06/12/2008 Oleg Ibragimovych KHAKNAZAROV 27/03/1961 06/05/2008, Commercial Court of Crimea       5190/09 14/01/2009 Yeva Vasylivna FOKIY 02/02/1975 22/06/2007, Sadgirskyy District Court of Chernivtsi   APPENDIX 2 (non-enforcement delays less than three years)   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant’s name and date of birth (if known) Enforceable domestic decisions       2025/05 28/12/2004 Viktor Viktorovych MELNYK 14/07/1959 22 /10/2002, Vyshgorod Court, became enforceable on 04/02/03 and was enforced on 28/10/05       2385/05 04/01/2005 Pavlo Ivanovych MALYUTA 01/01/1961 23/10/2003, Lenynskyy District Court of Kirovograd, became enforceable on 24/02/2004 and was quashed on 17/10/2006       30864/05 13/08/2005 Yevgeniy Petrovich SHYNKARYOV 02/07/1952 15/03/2005,   Kyiv Military Harrison Court, enforced by 05/01/2007       31062/05 12/08/2005 Yuriy Ivanovich NAGOGA 13/12/1955 30/09/2004, Lebedyn Court, enforced on 24/05/2006       15057/06 06/04/2006 Nadezhda Vladimirovna PARKHOMENKO 10/05/1954 14/11/2005,   Novokakhovka Court, enforced on 11/07/2008       15158/06 04/04/2006 Valentina Nikolayevna BOYKO 08/02/1949 15/11/2005 (court order), Novokakhovka Court, enforced on 11/07/2008       32723/06 10/07/06 Dmytro Myklayovych SHURUTA 27/04/1980 29/11/2005, Dzerzhynsk Court, enforced on 23/11/2007       2707/07 28/12/2006 Viktor Ivanovych PEDORYA 09/07/1949 20/03/2006,   Oleksandriya Court, enforced on 22/01/2008       28983/08 07/06/2008 Viktor Vasilyevich SERDYUKOV 16/04/1956 03/07/2007,   Krasnyy Luch Court, enforced on 30/04/2009       802/09 13/12/2008 Oleksandr Oleksandrovych LIFANOV 03/05/1963 11/03/2008, Vugledar Court, enforced on 26/11/2010   [1] .     Rectified on 4 March 2013; the text read “Gorlivka Court”. [2] .     Rectified on 4 March 2013; the text read “22/08/08”.