CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 6 juin 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sFC1B4D41 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; font-size:14pt } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sC443675D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sD2857263 { margin-top:30pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s39926ECA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s16935426 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:30pt; text-align:justify; font-size:14pt } .sF11CDCAF { margin-top:30pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify } .s401C450A { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEBA8B701 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify } .s11869A80 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s507703F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9D48DD53 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sAB173E38 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s60723A49 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:39.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s3B3A5DE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBAA06C68 { width:13.67pt; display:inline-block } .sC7BF4101 { width:166.26pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sAE61E8C9 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s11517CCE { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s959CEE7E { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s5B8637C { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s135383EB { margin-left:25.5pt; text-indent:-20.34pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sC7E0624E { width:0.16pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB673203C { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sED1A34C5 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s9773C167 { margin-left:25.5pt; text-indent:-22.56pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29BE6C23 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s78B6B604 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sCEE978D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both }     FIFTH SECTION           CASE OF KONONOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE   (Application no. 11770/03 and 89 other applications)                     JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   6 June 2013       This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kononova and Others v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,   Ann Power-Forde,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 14 May 2013, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in 90 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, one Russian national (application no. 56464/07) and companies based in Ukraine. Their details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”). 2.     In applications nos.   35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10 the applicants died in course of the proceedings before the Court. Their next-of-kin expressed a wish to pursue the applications. 3.     Mr Andriy Salnikov (application no. 28061/08) and Ms Diana Salnikova (application no. 28071/08) are brother and sister. They are both heirs of their deceased father and challenge the lengthy non-enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their father. 4.     The Government are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy. 5.     The applications listed in Appendices 1 and 2 were communicated to the Government on various dates in 2003-2011. 6.     The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no.   56464/07 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.     On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time. 8.     Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 9.     In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issues raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them. II.     THE SECOND APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No. 47387/06 10.     The second applicant in application no. 47387/06, Ms Lyubov Rusanova, complains about delay in payment of the salary caused by her former employer (State agency) and about the outcome of the proceedings before the domestic courts. The applicant has however failed to establish that any salary was outstanding, and has in any event failed to show that she appealed against the sole decision in the Court’s file. The Court finds that this part of application no. 47387/06 must be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. III.     THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANTS IN APPLICATIONS Nos.   35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10 11.     The Court considers that in applications listed in paragraph 2 (see above) the next-of-kin of the deceased applicants have standing to continue the proceedings in their stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v.   Ukraine , no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006). IV.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 12.     The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of the effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. Expressly or in substance they relied on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1. 13.     The Court notes that the above complaints (see paragraph 12 above) are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. 14.     The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible. 15.     Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, §§ 56-58 and 66-70, 15 October 2009) the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement. V.     OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 16.     Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 17.     It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. VI.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 18.     Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 19.     Bearing in mind its previous decisions on the matter (see Kharuk   and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 703/05 and 115 other applications, § 25, 26 July 2012), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non ‑ enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Appendix   1 with the exception of applications nos.   28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR   1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Appendix   2 and applications nos.   28061/08 and 28071/08). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses. 20.     The Court finds that the applicants in applications nos. 28061/08 and   28071/08 are to be awarded 1,500 euros (EUR) each, as, being heirs to their deceased father’s estate in equal parts, they both challenge the non ‑ enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their late father (see § 3 above). 21.     The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable. 22.     The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. 23.     The Court finally recalls that in the case of Kharuk it reiterated that it is an international judicial authority contingent on the consent of the States signatory to the Convention, that its principal task is to secure respect for human rights, rather than compensate applicants’ losses minutely and exhaustively, and that in cases involving many similarly situated victims a unified approach may be called for (see Kharuk v. Ukraine cited above, §§   23, 24). 24.     The Court considers that still further standardisation of awards in these cases is called for, and intends, in future judgments dealing with standard non-enforcement complaints against Ukraine, to award a single lump sum to each applicant, regardless of the non-enforcement period involved. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.     Decides to join the applications;   2.     Declares application no. 47387/06 inadmissible insofar as it is made by Ms Lyubov Rusanova;   3.     Declares the complaints of the applicants under Article 6 § 1 and Article   13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;   4 .     Holds that there has been a violation of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   5.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article   13 of the Convention;   6.     Holds (a)     that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 (with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros) (i)     to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and (ii)     in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2013, pursuant to Rule   77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.   Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX 1 (non-enforcement delays three years and more)   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicants’ name and date of birth Relevant domestic decisions   11770/03 28/03/2003 Svetlana Sergeyevna KONONOVA 04/04/1957 Suvorosvkyy District Court of Kherson, 06/06/2003 as amended by the Kherson Regional Court of Appeal, 11/02/2004   17953/05 06/05/2005 Nikolay Ivanovich DOVGALYOV 19/09/1957 Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Makiyivka, 12/08/2003, as amended by the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal on 04/12/2003   26918/05 06/07/2005 Nonna Igorevna PORTNOVA 27/12/1950 Commercial Court of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, 12/12/2002   18448/06 25/04/2006 PARITET LTD, TOV VKP Kyiv Commercial Court, 19/02/2002   18673/06 22/04/2006 Valeriy Viktorovych SYNELNYKOV 25/07/1968 1) Romny Court, 20/01/2005   2) Romby Court, 21/11/2006   20933/06 13/05/2006 Lyudmila Fyodorovna BOBROVA 12/05/1963 Nova Kakhovka Court, 27/09/2005   34409/06 12/07/2006 Vasiliy Aleksandrovich TERNOVIK 18/01/1960 Novogrodivka Court, 21/12/1999   34596/06 02/08/2006 Stanislav Ivanovych PRUDKYY 30/05/1963 1) Military Court of Kyiv the Garrison, 09/09/1999   2) Bila Tserkva Court, 24/06/2005   41295/06 04/10/2006 Lyudmyla Viktorivna BURYAN 10/10/1939 Berdychiv Court, 18/12/2003   47358/06 18/11/2006 Olena Yevgeniyivna LYOVOCHKINA 26/09/1959 Zavodskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 05/06/2001, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the Mykolayiv Regional Court of Appeal on 01/02/2006   47387/06 07/11/2006 Yelena Yevgenyevna GRYUNER 23/09/1958   Lyubov Aleksandrovna RUSANOVA 09/12/1948 Lenynskyy District Court of Zaporyzhzhya, 28/09/1999, rendered in respect of the first applicant   9229/07 06/02/2007 Olena Mykhaylivna PIKUSH 20/05/1941 Petrykivskyy District Court of the Dnipropetrovsk Region, 09/04/1996, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the same court on 08/06/2005   9356/07 12/02/2007 Mykola Yevgenovych TATARENKO 08/11/1959 1) Berezneguvate, 13/12/2005   2) Berezneguvate, 10/11/2006   3) Berezneguvate, 16/03/2007   19149/07 20/04/2007 Mykola Petrovych POPOV 30/11/1929 1) Berdychiv Court, 15/09/2006   2) Berdychiv Court, 28/09/2006   22887/07 11/05/2007 Mariya Fedorivna ODNOKOPYLA 22/06/1942 Podilskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/04/2002   24362/07 26/05/2007 Irina Yuryevna TIMOFEYEVA 13/01/1959 1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004   2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/02/2005   25143/07 29/05/2007 Viktor Feofanovich ZATURINSKIY 08/04/1948 1) Labour Disputes Commission of the "Yuzhnyy Elektromashynostroitelnyy Zavod" OJSC, 11/11/1999   2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/03/2007   3) Nova Kakhovka Court, 15/05/2007   26676/07 15/06/2007 KONEKS LTD, TOV 22/08/1956 Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 07/12/2005   31465/07 23/06/2007 Yakiv Mykhaylovych GORDIY 17/01/1945 1) Kosiv Court, 30/01/2006   2) Kosiv Court, 04/09/2003   34772/07 11/07/2007 Vasiliy Nikolayevich KOVALENKO 16/03/1969   Boris Nikolayevich ADAMOVICH 19/10/1958   Tatyana Vasilyevna BRUSLINOVSKAYA 13/02/1961   Anna Ivanovna DANILENKO 28/01/1947   Yekaterina Nikolayevna DANILENKO 06/12/1983   Antonina Nikolayevna KRAYNYAYA 15/11/1951   Natalya Mikhaylovna KULAYEVA 20/08/1957 Applicant 1: 1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 13/11/2002 2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 01/06/2005   Applicant 2: 3) Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/09/2002 4) Krasnyy Luch Court, 06/06/2005   Applicant 3: 5) Krasnyy Luch Court, 31/07/2002 6) Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/05/2005   Applicant 4: 7) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005   Applicant 5: 8) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005   Applicant 6: 9) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/01/2003 10) Krasnyy Luch Town Court, 18/07/2005   Applicant 7: 11) Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/12/2003 12) Krasnyy Luch Court, 07/06/2005   35771/07 20/07/2007 Lyudmila Pavlovna TOLSTOKOROVA 27/01/1937 1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004   2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 23/02/2005   35858/07 06/08/2007 Andrey Viktorovich MALTYZ 15/08/1972 Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 25/02/2008   40767/07 07/08/2007 Nina Petrovna PAVLENKO 26/02/1946 Pervomayskyy Court, 12/12/2005   44386/07 08/08/2006 Vitaliy Grygorovych PASYOVIN 18/07/1957 Bila Tserkva Court, 30/09/2005   51922/07 08/11/2007 Vladimir Dmitriyevich PUZENKO 15/01/1960 Crimea Court of Appeal, 17/04/2007   52743/07 12/11/2007 Marina Nikolayevna ISAYEVA 09/08/1964 1) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 29/05/2003   2) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 18/05/2006   56464/07 15/11/2007 Aleksandr Ivanovich KOLOSOV 26/03/1954 Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/03/1998   1865/08 15/12/2007 Nikolay Grigoryevich SHEVYCH 18/10/1952 Sverdlovsk Court, 27/05/2004   15601/08 21/03/2008 Aksentiy Platonovich DMITRASHEK 31/08/1940 1) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 31/05/2005   2) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 13/06/2005   3) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no.   2 ‑ 533, 01/06/2006   4) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no.   2 ‑ 534, 01/06/2006   20775/08 17/04/2008 Kateryna Fedorivna FESENKO 02/04/1949 Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 31/07/2002   27288/08 22/05/2008 Viktor Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV 31/05/1973 1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 22/06/2007   2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/09/2007   28061/08 05/06/2008 Andriy Sergiyovych SALNIKOV 24/12/1985 Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002   28071/08 05/06/2008 Diana Sergiyivna SALNIKOVA 05/02/1987 Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002   28090/08 16/05/2008 Andriy Mykhaylovych DANILOV 14/12/1966 Irpin Court, 23/11/2006   32466/08 12/06/2008 NAK, TOV Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 16/03/2006   37355/08 28/07/2008 Oleksandr Volodymyrovych PECHONCHYK 01/07/1966 Volodymyretskyy District Court of Rivne Region, 16/07/2002 as modified by the same court on 26/06/2008 (in light of the judgments of the same court dated 05/06/2007 and of the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal dated 11/09/2008)   46953/08 22/09/2008 Valentina Mikhaylovna MELNIKOVA 25/05/1931 Balaklavskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 23/06/2008   50872/08 19/09/2008 Ganna Oleksiyivna SITARUK 06/08/1926 Slavuta Court, 05/12/2002   61421/08 03/12/2008 Yevgeniya Trokhymivna GUTSOL 18/11/1937 1) Bershad Court, 27/04/2007   2) Vinnytsya Circuit Administrative Court, 15/09/2008   12892/09 19/02/2009 Anatoliy Grygoriyovych ARTYUKH 30/10/1948 Mukachevo Court, 12/03/2007, quashed in the light of newly discovered evidence by the Mukachevo Court on 24/12/2010   25260/09 21/04/2009 Vasyl Yukhymovych LEGKYY 11/11/1932 Tetiyiv Court, 19/11/2007   26397/09 04/03/2009 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich MATSEGORA 19/04/1958 Slovyansk Court, 13/03/2000   32372/09 19/05/2009 Galina Vasilyevna OLENICH 01/08/1945 1) Slovyansk Court, 15/03/2002   2) Slovyansk Court, 12/04/2002   3) Slovyansk Court, 04/06/2003   33588/09 11/06/2009 Valeriy Fedorovych KRASYUK 13/09/1948 Chervonograd Court, 13/06/2005   38444/09 01/07/2009 Nadiya Mykolayivna MELNYCHUK 10/02/1958 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007, Quashed By the Higher Administrative Court on 19/07/2011   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   44965/09 06/08/2009 Fekla Antonovna MUKHINA 20/12/1923 Antratsyt Court, 28/09/2006   46337/09 16/08/2009 ADEPT, PP Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal, 28/11/2005, quashed by the Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal on 21/06/2010   53257/09 25/09/2009 Igor Viktorovych FEDOTOV 30/01/1964 Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/04/2008     54385/09 02/10/2009 Taisiya Kostyantynivna TATARETS 06/11/1940 Zavodskyy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk, 10/05/2006, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal on 13/07/2006 and by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25/12/2008   54564/09 01/10/2009 Oleksandr Fedorovych SERDYUK 26/04/1962 1) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 04/09/2008   2) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 01/10/2008   54594/09 29/09/2009 Dmytro Grygorovych KAMENSKYY 11/05/1983 Pervomayskyy Court, 06/09/2007 as amended by the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal on 09/10/2007   59199/09 20/10/2009 Anatoliy Ivanovich RASKHODOV 24/06/1952 Labour Disputes Commission of the Lisychanskyy Zavod GTV , 14/06/2001   65102/09 27/11/2009 Vladimir Anatolyevich SENIK 27/01/1971 Kupyansk Court, 30/11/2001   67309/09 11/12/2009 Taras Yosyfovych GENTOSH   Drogobych Court, 29/12/2008   9993/10 04/02/2010 Vyacheslav Pavlovych OVCHYNNIKOV 27/07/1943 Mukachevo Court, 13/11/2006   11325/10 16/02/2010 Larysa Mykolayivna RYBALKO 26/03/1958   Yevgen Opanasovych RYBALKO 18/03/1955 Denys Yevgenovych RYBALKO 29/08/1981   Dmytro Yevgenovych RYBALKO 29/08/1981 Chervonozavodskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/11/2005   11826/10 11/02/2010 Galyna Oleksandrivna TARANENKO 30/03/1951 1) Pervomayskyy Court, 25/12/2007   2) Pervomayskyy Court, 26/02/2008   11976/10 16/02/2010 Anatoliy Danilovich MATVIYENKO 23/05/1943 1) Lugansk Circuit Administrative Court, 07/07/2009 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 25/11/2009   2) Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 08/02/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 12/06/2008   13482/10 22/02/2010 Aleksandr Vasilyevich MOROZOV 02/03/1958 1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/09/2008 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/12/2008   2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/09/2009 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/02/2010   15301/10 24/02/2010 Oleksandr Mykolayovych SAFONOV 19/03/1947   Valeriy Ivanovych MEDVEDEV 29/07/1946   Valentyn Fedorovych STOROZHENKO 07/09/1946   Stanislav Stanislavovych KUSHTAN 28/06/1941   Oleksandr Arsentyovych LISNENKO 06/12/1947   Sergiy Oleksandrovych ZAGLUSHCHENKO 08/06/1955 Applicant 1: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 27/01/2009 (two judgments on the same day: 2a-3/09 and 2a ‑ 4/09);   Applicant 2: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, February 2009 (enforcement proceedings no. 11946771, enforcement writ no. 2a-64 issued on 16/02/2009);   Applicant 3: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 16/02/2009;   Applicant 4: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 12/02/2009;   Applicant 5: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 08/12/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/03/2009;   Applicant 6: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 28/01/2009   16144/10 03/03/2010 REAGENT, TOV 09/06/1989 Khmenlytskyy Regional Commercial Court, 14/07/2004   16644/10 09/03/2010 Vitaliy Vitalyevich DYACHKIN 14/08/1976 Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 05/06/2009   17363/10 16/03/2010 Volodymyr Yuriyovych SIKAN 21/08/1968 Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 11/09/2007   17369/10 15/03/2010 Irina Mikhaylovna ROMANOVA 01/12/1957 Krasnyy Luch Court, 05/05/2004   17477/10 19/03/2010 Nadezhda Nikolayevna PALADIY 22/10/1952 1) Kerch Court, 06/08/2004   2) Kerch Court, 24/11/2004   17674/10 20/03/2010 Mykola Dmytrovych GRECHANYY 21/04/1949 Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 14/10/2008   20032/10 17/03/2010 Georgiy Ivanovych BILOUS 24/04/1926 Avtozavodsyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 26/06/2008   22620/10 25/03/2010 Petr Kuzmich KOVALENKO 11/07/1929 1) Kharkiv Regional Administrative Court, 17/11/2008   2) Balakliya Court, 20/07/2009   25360/10 23/04/2010 Vitaliy Gennadiyovych PANKOV 06/10/1972 Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003   25363/10 23/04/2010 Ryta Vitaliyivna ADAMOVSKA 10/06/1967 Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003   26232/10 20/04/2010 Mariya Ivanivna ARTYUKHOVA 21/08/1937 Velykyy Burluk Court,13/03/2008   26676/10 02/04/2010 Nikolay Nikolayevich YUKHIMENKO 17/09/1942 Court of Appeal of the Crimea, 30/09/2008   28834/10 17/04/2010 Grigoriy Vasilyevich ALFEROV 27/04/1960 Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 13/04/2009   29205/10 12/05/2010 Vladimir Stepanovich ANTOSHCHUK 15/04/1950 1) Torez Court, 27/11/2000   2) Torez Court, 07/12/2007   30803/10 17/05/2010 Nataliya Mykolayivna SAVCHENKO 12/01/1960 Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv, 29/03/2008   42600/10 19/07/2010 Antonina Nikolayevna KOSHELEVSKAYA 03/04/1962   Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOSHELEVSKIY 03/06/1987 Simferopol District Court of the Crimea, 13/04/2001   51950/10 15/07/2010 Vita Grygorivna NIKITCHENKO 25/04/1983 1) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 24/12/2008   2) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 13/07/2009   65624/10 28/10/2010 Vladimir Aleksandrovich BORISOV 06/02/1958 Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/02/2007   66602/10 28/10/2010 Anatoliy Ivanovych ZHUK 12/06/1966 Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 07/06/2006   66622/10 20/10/2010 Raisa Nikolayevna KORZH 23/02/1962 1) Labour Disputes Commission of “Zavod Mayak”, 01/04/2009   2) Selydovsk Court, 07/07/2008   66882/10 05/11/2010 Valentyna Mykolayivna KUCHER 03/04/1969 1) Svitlovodsk Court, 31/07/2006   2) Svitlovodsk Court, 22/12/2006   69639/10 11/11/2010 Petro Vasylyovych ZADERZHYNSKYY 15/07/1920 Dobropillya Court, 02/10/2007   5010/11 15/01/2011 Viktor Alekseyevich RASPOPOV 20/10/1935 Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 05/02/2009   APPENDIX 2 (non-enforcement delays less than three years)   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicants’ name and date of birth Relevant domestic decisions   60679/08 26/11/2008 Vladyslav Valeriyovych AVDEYENKO 10/06/1977 Ternopil Court, 24/09/2007   50101/09 01/09/2009 Gennadiy Petrovych STROM 26/06/1965 Oleksandriya Court, 06/11/2008   51423/09 09/09/2009 Iryna Ivanivna SKOCHKO 07/03/1971 Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009   52625/09 08/09/2009 Olena Volodymyrivna CHAYKA AKA OSTAPENKO 10/05/1979 Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009   32380/10 03/06/2010 Nadiya Oleksandrivna ZAGYNAYLO 04/10/1965   Yuliya Andriyivna SLOBODSKA AKA ZAGYNAYLO 21/09/1986 Golosiyivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/03/2009   52748/10 04/09/2010 Iryna Dmytrivna ULYANOVA 06/08/1956 1) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/06/2009   2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/02/2010, as amended by the judgment of the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal of 01/06/2010   55471/10 17/09/2010 Viktor Yakovych DRANYSH 28/07/1936 Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 11/08/2009