CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 septembre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sAE8EB48 { width:21.35pt; display:inline-block } .s501E6F6 { width:188.94pt; display:inline-block } .sB622B88D { width:38.36pt; display:inline-block } .sD5CCF864 { width:129.92pt; display:inline-block } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7E0F3F91 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s3C2CFC22 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s684B547D { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 44066/07 Şükriye CANGİR and others against Turkey and 7 other applications (see list appended)   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 3   September 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   András Sajó,   Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Atilla Nalbant, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications, indicated in the Appendix, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the Appendix. Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings appear in the Appendix. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts. Certain procedures lasted several years, however some proceedings are still pending before the domestic courts. B.     Relevant domestic law A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Müdür   Turgut and Others ((dec.), no.   4860/09, §§   19-26, 26   March 2013). COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article   6 §   1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time. Certain applicants alleged violations of Article   13 of the Convention that there was no effective remedy under Turkish law. Certain applicants also complained under Article   1 of Protocol no.   1 to the Convention, the amounts awarded to them lost their value due to the length of the proceedings. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule   42 §   1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given the similarity of the facts and of the legal issues raised. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 §   1 OF THE CONVENTION The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement, laid down in Article   6 §   1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by a ... tribunal...” The Court observes that the applicants asserted that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the principle of the “reasonable time” requirement in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. The Court found in Müdür   Turgut and Others ((dec.), cited above, §§   58 and   60) that the Compensation Commission established by Law   no.   6384, insofar as it is, a priori , accessible and capable of offering a reasonable prospect of redress for complaints concerning the length of proceedings. Accordingly, the applicants should avail themselves of the new remedy offered by Law   no.   6384. It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article   35 §§   1 and   4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. III.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   13 OF THE CONVENTION Some applicants also complain that there was no effective remedy under Turkish law. They rely in this regard Article   13 of the Convention, which provides: “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.” The Court recalls that it has also held that the Compensation Commission established by Law   no.   6384 provides for a remedy to the applicants within the meaning of Article   13 of the Convention to complain about the length of proceedings to purposes of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention relating to all applications pending before the Court, not yet communicated to the respondent Government submitted before 23   September 2012 ( Müdür   Turgut and Others (dec.), cited above, §   59). It follows that this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   3   (a) and   4 of the Convention. IV.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   1 OF PROTOCOL NO.   1 OF THE CONVENTION Having carefully examined certain applicants’ complaints in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, the Court finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible.   Atilla Nalbant   Peer Lorenzen   Acting Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX   No Application No. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by Notes   44066/07 25/09/2007 Şükriye CANGİR 04/03/1962 Mardin   Halise ERTAŞ 03/03/1956 Mardin   Ayini KURTAY 08/10/1941 Mardin   Lamia CEYLAN 02/02/1947 Mardin   Sultani KURTAY 01/01/1941 Mardin   Abdulkahar KURTAY Mardin   Halef KURTAY Mardin   Nedye KURTAY Mardin   Eylem KURTAY Mardin   Nurullah KURTAY Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1975/6, K: RE:   2007/1.   2872/10 18/12/2009 Vahap KARABOĞA 06/04/1978 Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Mardin Assize Court E:   2002/245   2874/10 18/12/2009 İhsan KARABOĞA 11/10/1955 Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Mardin Assize Court E:   2002/245   12386/10 19/02/2010 Vatha YILMAZ 01/10/1962 Mardin   Apta YILMAZ 01/01/1938 Mardin   Emine SAĞLAM 01/10/1964 Mardin   Mehmet YILMAZ 04/10/1959 Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1964/193.     58831/10 09/08/2010 Zeynep HAZAR Mardin   Zübeyde SAVCI Mardin   Zahra DÜZGÖREN Mardin     Selahattin HAZAR Mardin   Mustafa HAZAR Mardin   Meryem KORHAN Mardin   Mehmet SAVCI Mardin   İbrahim SAVCI Mardin   Mahsun HAZAR Mardin   Hıdır SAVCI 10/08/1969 Mardin   Fatma DÜZGÖREN Mardin   Hatice TALAYHAN Mardin     Fatma HAZAR Mardin Emine İLBOĞA Mardin     Ayşe HAZAR 04/02/1964 Mardin   Ahmet HAZAR Mardin   Ahmet SAVCI Mardin   Abdurrezak HAZAR 01/02/1963 Mardin   Abdulvahit HAZAR Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1978/70.     46199/11 16/06/2011 Kemal OLĞAÇ 03/01/1932 Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Mardin Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2010/498   6961/12 27/12/2011 Bedir NAS 15/05/1947 Mardin   Ali AYDEMİR Mardin Administrative Court, E:   2010/599, K:   2011/160   6972/12 27/12/2011 İsmail ÖZZENGİN 25/01/1980 Mardin Ali AYDEMİR Mardin Administrative Court, E:   2010/592, K:   2011/1411