CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 septembre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sAE8EB48 { width:21.35pt; display:inline-block } .s501E6F6 { width:188.94pt; display:inline-block } .sB622B88D { width:38.36pt; display:inline-block } .sD5CCF864 { width:129.92pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7E0F3F91 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s3C2CFC22 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s684B547D { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 14154/10 Ramazan KARALI against Turkey and 14 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 17   September 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   András Sajó,   Nebojša Vučinić, judges and Atilla Nalbant, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications, listed in the Appendix, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings appear in the Appendix. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts. Certain procedures lasted several years, however some proceedings are still pending before the domestic courts. B.     Relevant domestic law A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Müdür   Turgut and Others ((dec.), no.   4860/09, §§   19-26, 26   March 2013). COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6   §   1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time. Certain applicants also complained that excessive length of civil proceedings brought against them amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment in breach of Article   3 of the Convention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule   42 §   1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given the similarity of the facts and of the legal issues raised. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 §   1 OF THE CONVENTION The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings was incompatible within the ‘‘reasonable time’’ requirement, laid down in Article   6 §   1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by a ... tribunal...” The Court observes that the applicants asserted that the length of the proceedings was incompatible with the principle of the ‘‘reasonable time’’ requirement in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention. In that respect, the Court found in Müdür   Turgut and   Others ((dec.), cited above, §§   58 and   60) that the Compensation Commission established by Law   no.   6384, insofar as it is accessible and capable of offering reasonable prospects of redress for complaints concerning the length of proceedings constituted a remedy which applicants were required to exhaust for the purposes of Article   35 §   1 of the Convention. Accordingly, the applicants should avail themselves of the new remedy offered by Law   no.   6384. It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article   35 §§   1 and   4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. III.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION Having carefully examined the applicants’ complaints in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, the Court finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   3 and   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible.   Atilla Nalbant   Peer Lorenzen   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by Notes   14154/10 09/02/2010 Ramazan KARALI 13/04/1943 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   14189/10 09/02/2010 Mustafa YILDIRIM 01/07/1953 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   14198/10 09/02/2010 Sinan İGAÇ 11/12/1958 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   14206/10 09/02/2010 Mehmet BÜYÜKÇAY 13/03/1933 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   14211/10 09/02/2010 Mustafa KARĞIN 01/01/1950 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   14218/10 09/02/2010 Mustafa KARA 01/01/1949 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   14225/10 09/02/2010 Mehmet YILDIRIM 01/07/1956 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1991/22   25488/10 19/04/2010 Saadet KARACA 01/07/1962 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1984/3     26827/10 19/04/2010 Ömer GÜNGEN 20/04/1949 Şanlıurfa Abdurrahman ÖZBİLGİÇ 20/12/1956 Şanlıurfa   İbrahim ÇAKAL 03/03/1940 Siverek   Mustafa AY 30/07/1958 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1989/23               26832/10 19/04/2010 Celal KARACA 01/07/1944 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1984/3               53052/10 19/04/2010 Salih KARACA 04/08/1941 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1984/3             64958/10 08/10/2010 Hüseyin ERİK 01/01/1949 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI   Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1975/42 K:   2007/7             68576/10 08/10/2010 Cuma COŞKUN 01/01/1948 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1975/42 K:   2007/7             69799/10 08/10/2010 Zini ERİK 01/01/1949 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1975/42 K:   2007/7             69802/10 08/10/2010 Devriş ERİK 01/01/1955 Şanlıurfa Yılmaz KANBALI Siverek Cadastral Court, E:   1975/42 K:   2007/7