CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 septembre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF3D840DB { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:9pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sEDB370AC { width:19.68pt; display:inline-block } .s48E1953 { width:187.27pt; display:inline-block } .sB622B88D { width:38.36pt; display:inline-block } .sD5CCF864 { width:129.92pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s7E0F3F91 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s3C2CFC22 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s684B547D { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE8B29217 { page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sCBC20640 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 33034/12 Necati GÖREN against Turkey and 20 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 17   September 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   András Sajó,   Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Atilla Nalbant, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications, indicated in the Appendix, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings appear in the Appendix. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts. Certain procedures lasted several years, however some proceedings are still pending before the domestic courts. B.     Relevant domestic law A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Müdür Turgut and Others ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013). COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time. Certain applicants also alleged a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.1 to the Convention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given the similarity of the facts and of the legal issues raised. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings was incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement, laid down in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by a ... tribunal...” The Court observes that the applicants asserted the length of the proceedings was incompatible with the principle of the “reasonable time” requirement in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. In that respect, the Court found in Müdür Turgut and Others (cited above, § 56), that the Compensation Commission established by Law no. 6384, insofar as that it is accessible and capable of offering reasonable prospects of redress for complaints concerning the length of proceedings constituted a remedy which applicants were required to exhaust for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention. Accordingly, the applicants should avail themselves of the new remedy offered by Law no. 6384 of 9 January 2013. It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. III.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No 1 OF THE CONVENTION Having carefully examined certain applicants’ complaints in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, the Court finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible.   Atilla Nalbant   Peer Lorenzen   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by Notes   33034/12 20/04/2012 Necati GÖREN 01/05/1957 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation, E:   2011/15185, K:   2011/21314     33044/12 09/03/2012 Ahmet UZMALİ 01/07/1967 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Kartal 1. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2005/114, K:   2011/14     33048/12 09/03/2012 Zarif MANDUZ 02/03/1968 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Kartal 2. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2004/642, K:   2005/174     33050/12 09/03/2012 Süleyman URUŞ 24/09/1956 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Kartal 1. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2005/161, K:   2011/17     33052/12 09/03/2012 İbrahim Hakkı SUBAŞI 01/02/1954 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Kartal 2. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2005/124, K:   2011/4     33056/12 09/03/2012 Salih TOPRAK 14/04/1964 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Kartal 2. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E: 2005/122, K: 2011/3     33059/12 09/03/2012 Emine KÜÇÜKER 05/05/1958 Steinheim   Nurettin AKBULUT 15/01/1954 Istanbul Hüseyin PALA Kartal 4. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2010/680 , K:   2011/191     33061/12 09/03/2012 Emine BAYRAKTAR 03/07/1946 Trabzon   Hasan KÜRKAN 01/07/1940 Trabzon Hüseyin PALA Kartal 4. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2010/680, K:   2011/191     33078/12 09/03/2012 Emine YILDIRIM 01/03/1950 İstanbul   Mümin YILDIRIM 15/05/1970 İstanbul   Nevin ERDOĞAN 06/04/1971 İstanbul   Hatice YILDIRIM 21/10/1976 İstanbul Hüseyin PALA Kartal 1. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2010/598, K:   2011/5             33090/12 09/03/2012 Ali KATIRCIOĞLU 20/04/1937 İstanbul   Abdullah KATIRCIOĞLU 04/04/1965 İstanbul   Mustafa Talat KATIRCIOĞLU 20/09/1971 İstanbul   Fatma Nuray DEMİRCAN 26/03/1962 İstanbul   Necla KATIRCIOĞLU 02/02/1945 İstanbul   Şule KATIRCIOĞLU 13/11/1978 İstanbul     Hüseyin PALA Kartal 1. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, E:   2005/115, K:   2011/15             34698/12 06/04/2012 Fatma ÖZYOLU 01/02/1964 İstanbul   Cengiz ÖZYOLU 26/12/1981 İstanbul   Deniz KUMUŞ 12/07/1984 İstanbul   Cihan ÖZYOLU 06/07/1980 İstanbul Ceren ÖZYOLU 02/05/2001 İstanbul     Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E: 20011/12926, K:   2011/18349               34774/12 06/04/2012 Mustafa ÇOBAN 18/07/1957 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E:2011/12928, K:2011/18350                 34778/12 06/04/2012 Şengül DEMİR 17/09/1968 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E:   2011/1292, K:   2011/18354             34780/12 06/04/2012 Coşkun MALLI 21/10/1986 İstanbul   Pınar MALLI 05/04/1985 İstanbul     Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E:   2011/11559, K:   2011/17097             34823/12 06/04/2012 Hakiye GÜL 01/08/1940 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E:   2011/12975, K:   2011/18370             34838/12 06/04/2012 Cemal GENÇ 01/01/1956 Istanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E: 2011/12928, K:   2011/18350             36441/12 06/04/2012 İbrahim AYGÜN 08/03/1933 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E:   2011/11560, K:   2011/17110             36643/12 06/04/2012 Abdullah KIZILTAŞ 10/01/1950 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E:   2011/12931, K:   2011/18368             36661/12 06/04/2012 ERSAN ASANSÖR SANAYİ VE TİCARET LİMİTED ŞİRKETİ İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E: 2011/12929, K:   2011/18369             36667/12 06/04/2012 Halit BAYKARA 10/02/1955 İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Court of Cassation E: 2011/12930, K: 2011/ 18351               62589/12 01/08/2012 TOKSAR İNŞAAT VE YAPI MALZEMELERİ SANAYİ VE TİCARET LTD. ŞTİ. İstanbul   Hüseyin PALA Kartal 1. Civil Court of General Jurisdiction E:   2011/249