CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 1 octobre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s8DF6C4 { font-family:Arial; color:#333333 } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sAB55E796 { width:26.35pt; display:inline-block } .sABCB874F { width:193.94pt; display:inline-block } .sB622B88D { width:38.36pt; display:inline-block } .sD5CCF864 { width:129.92pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s28F5597F { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s87A1E8B1 { height:48.5pt } .s7E0F3F91 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .sF95AF3A7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11.5pt } .s3C2CFC22 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s684B547D { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .s858CF1B6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11.5pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sEFD75434 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11.5pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s987DB328 { width:15.01pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s91B7EC39 { height:293.85pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 7463/09 Mustafa Şevket TARI and others against Turkey and 12 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 1   October 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   András Sajó,   Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Seçkin Erel, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications, listed in the Appendix, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the Appendix. Additionally, the case and decision numbers of the impugned proceedings appear in the Appendix. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. On various dates, the applicants initiated actions before various civil courts or civil proceedings were brought against them before the civil courts. Certain procedures lasted several years, however some proceedings are still pending before the domestic courts. B.     Relevant domestic law A description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Müdür   Turgut and Others ((dec.), no.   4860/09, §§   19-26, 26   March 2013 ). COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article   6 §   1 of the Convention that the proceedings before the national courts had not been concluded within a reasonable time. Certain applicants complained under Article   6 §   1 and   17 of the Convention about the outcome of the proceedings. Certain applicants also alleged violations of Article   1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule   42 §   1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their common legal background. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE LENGTH OF THE PROCEEDINGS The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement, laid down in Article   6§   1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by a ... tribunal...” The Court observes that the applicants asserted that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the principle of the “reasonable time” requirement in accordance with Article   6§   1 of the Convention. The Court found in Müdür   Turgut and   Others (cited above, §§   58 and   60) that the Compensation Commission established by Law   no.   6384, insofar as it is a priori accessible and capable of offering reasonable prospects of redress for complaints concerning the length of proceedings, constituted a remedy which applicants were required to exhaust for the purposes of Article   35 §   1 of the Convention. Accordingly, the applicants should avail themselves of the new remedy offered by Law   no.   6384. It follows that these complaints must be rejected under Article   35 §§   1 and   4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. III.     OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION A.     Article   6 §   1 and   17 of the Convention Certain applicants also complained under Article   6 §   1 about the outcome and the alleged unfairness of the proceedings. In so far as this complaint may be understood to concern the assessment of the evidence and the result of the proceedings before the domestic courts, the Court reiterates that, according to Article   19 of the Convention, its duty is to ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the Contracting Parties to the Convention. In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention. Moreover, while Article   6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see García Ruiz v.   Spain [GC], no.   30544/96 , §   28, ECHR   1999 ‑ I). In the present case, the Court is satisfied that the applicants’ submissions do not disclose any appearance that the courts lacked impartiality, or that the proceedings were otherwise unfair or arbitrary. It follows that these complaints must be declared inadmissible as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article   35 §§   3 and   4 of the Convention. B.     Article   1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention Having carefully examined certain applicants’ complaints in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, the Court finds that it does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that these parts of the applications are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   3 and   4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible.   Seçkin Erel   Peer Lorenzen   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by Notes   7463/09 02/02/2009 Mustafa Şevket TARI 01/01/1930 Istanbul   Ahmet Erbil YOLAY Istanbul   Ayten DELİORMAN Istanbul   Hüseyin TARI Istanbul   Nurşen YOLAY Istanbul   Ömür YOLAY Istanbul   Özlem YOLAY Istanbul   Yücel ÇAKIR Istanbul   Eda GÜNLÜCE Muğla   Gülten SARAK TARI (KANYALI) Istanbul Rahmi AKYÜREK Court of Cassation, E:   2008/2913, K:   2008/3351.   16599/10 10/03/2010 Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul   Abidin KAYHAN Istanbul   Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin   Türkiye YILDIZ 09/02/1933 Mardin   Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul   Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Eyyüp Sabır AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir   Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul   Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1971/4, K:   1989/24   16684/10 10/03/2010 Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul   Abidin KAYHAN Istanbul   Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin       Türkiye YILDIZ 09/02/1933 Mardin   Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul   Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Eyyüp Sabır AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir   Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul   Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1978/2.   16689/10 10/03/2010 Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul   Abidin KAYHAN Istanbul   Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin   Türkiye YILDIZ 09/02/1933 Mardin       Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul   Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Eyyüp Sabır AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir   Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul   Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Court of Cassation, E:   2006/2587, K:   2006/3479.   35872/10 13/05/2010 Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul   Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul   Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin   Türkiye YILDIZ 09/02/1933 Mardin   Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul     Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Eyyüp Sabır AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir   Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1965/295     59553/10 07/09/2010 Ali KARAASLAN 11/05/1967 Mardin   Hasine AKKOYUN 01/10/1950 Mardin   Azize KARAASLAN 01/02/1939 Mardin   Ayten KARAASLAN 05/05/1979 Mardin   Asya OKTAY 01/02/1949 Mardin   Abdülmecit ERTAŞ 01/01/1949 Mardin   Abas KARAASLAN 10/03/1940 Mardin     Zerga İLHAN 01/01/1955 Mardin   Reşit KARAASLAN 23/11/1975 Mardin   Hüseyin KARAASLAN 03/01/1965 Mardin   Hacci ERTAŞ 01/02/1940 Mardin   Hasan KARAASLAN 05/04/1963 Mardin   Güle DEMİR 24/05/1973 Mardin   Güli DOĞAN 10/07/1941 Mardin   Gamra TARHAN 01/01/1962 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1966/194, K:   2010/3     60270/10 20/09/2010 Zerga İLHAN 01/01/1955 Mardin   Ali KARAASLAN 11/05/1967 Mardin   Hasine AKKOYUN 01/10/1950 Mardin     Azize KARAASLAN 01/02/1939 Mardin   Ayten KARAASLAN 05/05/1979 Mardin   Asya OKTAY 01/02/1949 Mardin   Abdülmecit ERTAŞ 01/01/1949 Mardin   Abas KARAASLAN 10/03/1940 Mardin   Reşit KARAASLAN 23/11/1975 Mardin   Hüseyin KARAASLAN 03/01/1965 Mardin   Hacci ERTAŞ 01/02/1940 Mardin   Hasan KARAASLAN 05/04/1963 Mardin   Güle DEMİR 24/05/1973 Mardin   Güli DOĞAN 10/07/1941 Mardin   Gamra TARHAN 01/01/1962 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1973/186.     54758/12 30/05/2012 Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul   Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin   Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul   Eyyüp Sabır AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir   Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin   Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   2007/1     54787/12 23/05/2012 Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul       Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin   Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul   Eyyüp Sabir AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir   Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin   Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   2007/1               54795/12 30/05/2012 Mehmet Şirin AYDIN 05/03/1936 Mardin   Zeyni KAYHAN 10/02/1950 Istanbul Nurhayat AYDIN KAYHAN 10/08/1964 Mardin   Fikret KAYHAN 04/04/1965 Istanbul   Eyyüp Sabır AYDIN 06/11/1981 Nevşehir       Güla Dicle AYDIN 28/11/1974 Mardin   Nadire AYDIN 01/09/1940 Mardin   Abdulhalim AYDIN 19/12/1947 Istanbul Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   2007/1.             66227/12 31/08/2012 Abas KARAASLAN 10/03/1940 Mardin   Azize KARAASLAN 01/02/1939 Mardin   Hacci ERTAŞ 01/02/1940 Mardin   Güli DOĞAN 10/07/1941 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1966/164               8758/13 31/12/2012 İhsan KARABOĞA 11/10/1955 Mardin   İhsan KARABOĞA 01/01/1955 Mardin   Ahmet KARABOĞA 01/08/1972 Mardin   Mahsum KARABOĞA 03/01/1965 Mardin       Hamza KARABOĞA 01/02/1975 Mardin   Abdulkerim KARABOĞA 03/01/1957 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1961/203, K:   2010/6               9078/13 31/12/2012 İhsan KARABOĞA 11/10/1955 Mardin   İhsan KARABOĞA 01/01/1955 Mardin   Ahmet KARABOĞA 01/08/1972 Mardin   Mahsum KARABOĞA 03/01/1965 Mardin   Hamza KARABOĞA 01/02/1975 Mardin   Abdulkerim KARABOĞA 03/01/1957 Mardin Yılmaz FİDAN Kızıltepe Cadastral Court, E:   1961/206.