CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2013
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1203DEC000261404
- Date
- 3 décembre 2013
- Publication
- 3 décembre 2013
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInadmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7CB9076 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sBAA06C68 { width:13.67pt; display:inline-block } .sC7BF4101 { width:166.26pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sC53DCA36 { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; border-collapse:collapse } .sEE5B05E3 { width:7.84%; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s984895A { width:15.7%; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sACE10DB9 { width:25.5%; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC4FF1187 { width:27.44%; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s14A288BD { width:23.52%; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s426FCBFD { width:7.84%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD0BE8EF6 { width:15.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sFB36DB61 { width:25.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA14E9574 { width:27.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sD8617F5A { width:23.52%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s166B2F30 { width:7.84%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s69F3E313 { width:15.7%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s934092C5 { width:25.5%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sE31C6515 { width:27.44%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sC3DB1628 { width:23.52%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 2614/04 Iryna Vlasivna NAKALYUZHNA against Ukraine and 71 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 3   December 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,   Ann Power-Forde,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates stated in the annexed table, Having regard to the decision to apply the pilot-judgment procedure taken in the case of Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, 15   October 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are Ukrainian nationals, except for the applicants in applications nos. 17631/07 and 50344/07, who are respectively Moldovan and Russian nationals. Applicants in the applications nos. 17516/04 and 8062/09 are legal entities registered in Ukraine. Personal details of all the applicants are set out in the annexed table. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy, of the Ministry of Justice. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. On the dates set out in the annexed table below the national courts held for the applicants and ordered the defendants under these judgments (debtors) to take certain measures or to pay various amounts to the applicants. The judgments became binding but the authorities delayed their enforcement. The applications were communicated to the Ukrainian Government within the pilot judgment in the case of Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov cited above. COMPLAINTS The applicants complained principally about the lengthy non ‑ enforcement of judgments in their favour. THE LAW The Court first considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications listed in in the appended table should be joined, given their common legal background. The respondent Government informed the Court that the applications did not comply with the admissibility criteria of the Convention and thus invited the Court to declare them inadmissible. The applicants disagreed. The Court has carefully examined the applications and notes that in each case the communicated non-enforcement complaints are inadmissible on the grounds set out in the annexed table (see last column). The Court further notes that, in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matter complained of is within its competence, all the other complaints of the applicants do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that all the applications listed in the annexed table are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible.   Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič   Deputy Registrar   President Appendix   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence Relevant domestic decision Reasons for inadmissibility     2614/04 01/12/2003 Iryna Vlasivna NAKALYUZHNA 14/02/1976 Bobryk 1) Brovary Court, 29/03/1999   2) Brovary Court, 02/10/2003 Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies     16569/04 30/03/2004 Aleksandr Viktorovich VOYTENKO 1) Oleksandriya Court, 02/04/2002   2) Oleksandriy Court, 26/01/2004 Manifestly ill-founded     16981/04 04/03/2004 Leonid Semenovych VOROTNIKOV 08/07/1940 Zidky Zmiyivskyy District Court of Kharkiv Region, 20/04/2001 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies     17516/04 15/03/2004 OPTIMA, TOV Kyiv Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal, 26/11/2001, as amended by the Higher Commercial Court on 25/01/2002   Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies     38825/04 02/12/2003   Olga Mikhaylovna DYAKOVA 03/02/1957 Donetsk Budennovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 13/03/1997 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies     17533/05 27/04/2005 Zoya Fedorovna NEKHOROSHKOVA Zhovtnevyy District Court of Dnipropetrovsk, 19/04/2004 Manifestly ill-founded     29637/05 22/07/2005 Andrey Nikolayevich KOZLOV 01/08/1966 Sevastopol 1) Navy Court of Appeal, 14/04/2005   2) Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 26/09/2006   3) Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 13/12/2006   4) Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol,   08/10/2007 1) Six months   2) No significant disadvantage   3) No significant disadvantage   4) No significant disadvantage     264/06 07/12/2005 Vasyl Dmytrovych KRAVCHENKO 11/11/1947 Kyiv Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 13/08/2004 Manifestly ill-founded     1787/06 23/12/2005 Lyudmyla Adamivna KOVNER   Chernigiv 1) Chernigiv Regional Court of Appeal, 28/03/2002   2) Novozavodskyy DIstrict Court of Chernigiv, 27/01/2005   3) Chernigiv Regional Court of Appeal, 27/10/2005 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) No significant disadvantage   3) No significant disadvantage   3264/06 15/12/2005 Vasyl Semenovych SHCHERBAK   Kyiv Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 28/07/2004 Manifestly ill-founded   10408/06 03/03/2006 Andrey Nikolayevich GAMOV   Zaporozhye 1) Lugansk Commercial Court, 01/11/2000   2) Donetsk Commercial Court, 14/03/2002   3) Donetsk Commercial Court, 22/02/2006   4) Lugansk Commercial Court, 14/06/2006   5) Donetsk Commercial Court, 15/02/2007 Ratione personae   10706/06 06/03/2006 Yuriy Nikolayevich BOGDANCHENKO   Sevastopol 1) Sevastopol City Court of Appeal, 20/11/2001   2) Sevastopol City Court of Appeal, 03/02/2005 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) No significant disadvantage   10846/06 31/01/2006 Volodymyr Fedorovych KOVNER   Chernigiv 1) Chernigiv Regional Court of Appeal, 28/03/2002   2) Novozavodskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 02/03/2004   3) Desnyanskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 11/08/2005, as amended by the judgment of 19/10/2005 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   3) No significant disadvantage   23289/06 19/05/2006 Andrey Nikolayevich KOZLOV 01/08/1966 Sevastopol 1) Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 16/02/2006   2) Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 20/03/2007 1) No significant disadvantage   2) Manifestly ill-founded   31667/06 18/07/2006 Leonid Vasilyevich MOSKALENKO 14/07/1952 Donetsk 1) Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 10/02/1995   2) Kalininskyy District Court of Donetsk, 07/10/2004 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   32137/06 03/07/2006 Mykhaylo Mykhaylovych DOVBENCHUK 25/11/1945 Kalush 1) Kalush Court, 05/02/2002   2) Kalush Court, 08/10/2003 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   32932/06 07/07/2006 Feofan Antonovich NAZAREVICH 27/04/1939 Lutsk Lutsk Court, 29/01/2002 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   41754/06 02/10/2006 Vladyslava Oleksiyivna MINAYEVA 14/08/1974 Kyiv 1) Svyatoshynskyy District Curt of Kyiv, 24/05/2005   2) Kyiv City Court of Appeal, 26/06/2006 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) No significant disadvantage   42204/06 09/10/2006 Galina Viktorovna ITSENKO 16/08/1963 Mykolayiv 1) Zavovskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 22/07/2003   2) Zavovskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 19/03/2004   3) Zavovskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 13/12/2004 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   43178/06 06/10/2006 Tamara Nikolayevna TUOVINEN   Riistavesi Leninskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 20/02/2002 No significant disadvantage   46410/06 03/09/2006 Oleksandr Mykolayovych VOLKOV 12/10/1954 Ivano-Frankivsk 1) Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 25/03/2002   2) Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 06/10/2005, as amended by the Higher Administrative Court, 06/12/2006 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   284/07 02/12/2006 Valeriy Arkadyevich PARKHOMCHUK   Dneprodzerzhinsk Dnipropetrovsk Regional Commercial Court, 22/11/2001 Six months   4135/07 11/10/2006 Stanislav Aleksandrovich BONDARENKO   Donetsk Yenakiyevo Court, 05/06/2000 Six months   9772/07 31/01/2007 Aleksandr Alekseyevich YEGOROV 10/07/1957 Donetsk Kyivskyy District Court of Donetsk, 02/06/2004 Manifestly ill-founded   15160/07 30/03/2007 Oleksandr Fedorovych PANCHENKO 31/08/1958 Molodogvardeysk Krasnyy Luch Court, 02/06/2003 Manifestly ill-founded   17631/07 02/04/2007 Ilya Alekseyevich VIDRASHKO   Bender Moldovan   Odesa Regional Court of Appeal, 11/09/2003 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   33996/07 26/07/2007 Vladimir Fedorovich URSOL   Pervomaysk Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 30/05/2005 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   39228/07 16/07/2007 Yuriy Ivanovich POLOZHIY   Kramatorsk Kramatorsk Court, 08/08/2003 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   40718/07 18/08/2007 Vasiliy Aleksandrovich KOVALYOV   Konstantinovka Kostyantynivka Court, 16/12/2004 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   41114/07 21/08/2007 Anatoliy Mikhaylovich SERBIN 24/07/1938 Illichevsk Odesa Regional Court of Appeal, 19/12/2007 Manifestly ill-founded   44311/07 29/09/2007 Lidiya Nikolayevna MITYUSHINA   Oleksandrivka Oleksandriya Court, 04/03/1998 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   45543/07 03/10/2007 Mariya Stanislavovna POKOTYLO   Bilenke 1) Dobropillya Court, 24/09/1996   2) Dobropillya Court, 08/04/2002   3) Dobropillya Court, 08/09/2005 as amended by the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal on 24/11/2005 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   3) No significant disadvantage     47078/07 15/10/2007 Aleksandr Iosifovich RUBAKHA 25/07/1950 Dnipropetrovsk Zhovtnevyy District Court of Dnipropetrovsk, 06/10/2004 No significant disadvantage   50344/07 30/10/2007 Vladimir Yakubovich AKHMETOV 1960 Shandrygolovo Slovyansk Court, 27/04/2006 No significant disadvantage   51778/07 01/11/2007 Vyacheslav Ivanovych ANADSKYY   Yenakiyeve Donetsk Regional Commercial Court, 25/06/2007 No significant disadvantage No longer a victim   2317/08 15/12/2007 Georgiy Ivanovych BOBAL 27/01/1945 Svalyava 1) Svalyavskyy District Court of Zakarpattya Region, 28/03/2005   2) Svalyavskyy District Court of Zakarpattya Region, 09/03/2000   3) Svalyavskyy District Court of Zakarpattya Region, 01/12/2000   4) Svalyavskyy District Court of Zakarpattya Region, 06/12/2001 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   6962/08 18/01/2008 Vladyslav Volodymyrovych LYSYANYY 14/06/1965 Kyiv Kyiv City Court of Appeal, 21/02/2005 No significant disadvantage   7192/08 26/01/2008 Oleksandr Borysovych KHOMENKO   Kaniv Kaniv Court, 06/02/2007 Manifestly ill-founded   7792/08 28/01/2008 Alla Ivanivna POSUNKO 27/12/1949 Gorlivka Mykytivskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 30/10/2000 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   7806/08 30/01/2008 Volodymyr Leonidovych DUDIN 30/11/1952 Trostyanets Vinnytsya Circuit Administrative Court, 20/12/2007 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   8186/08 07/02/2008 Oleg Ivanovych GELYK 12/05/1947 Kyiv Solomyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 27/12/2005 Ratione personae   9150/08 30/01/2008 Vadym Ivanovych TARNAVSKYY 17/08/1941 Odesa Prymorskyy District Court of Odesa, 25/12/2000 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   14854/08 12/03/2008 Igor Anatoliyovych LIPANOV 22/07/1962 Zhytomyr Korolyovskyy District Court of Zhytomyr, 17/10/2007 Manifestly ill-founded   17382/08 26/03/2008 Kateryna Mykolayivna YEFREMOVA 22/04/1954 Bilogirsk Belogorsk Court, 15/03/2005, as amended by the Crimea Court of Appeal on 11/07/2005 Six months   21955/08 16/04/2008 Oleksandr Leonidovych KRYCHYLSKYY 08/02/1982 Kostopil 1) Rivnenskyy District Court of Rivne Region, 13/06/2002   2) Kostopil Court, 25/07/2003   3) Kostopil Court, 28/12/2006 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   23110/08 29/04/2008 Aleksandr Lazarevich DRONOV   Rovenky Rovenky Court, 20/12/2004 Six months   23460/08 08/05/2008 Volodymyr Viktorovych KOROTUN   Melitopol Melitopol Court, 19/09/2006 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   23471/08 05/05/2008 Anatoliy Vasilyevich MATVIYENKO 04/11/1941 Kherson 1) Komsomolsk Court, 09/09/1997   2) Komsomolsk Court, 25/05/2000   3) Komsomolsk Court, 03/12/2004 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   33553/08 04/06/2008 Borys Mykytovych BEZKOROVAYNYY 08/12/1956 Korop 1) Korop Court, 21/02/2006 2) Bakhmach Court, 23/01/2007 3) Bakhmach Court, 23/02/2007 4) Chernigiv Regional Court of Appeal, 29/03/2007 No significant disadvantage   36619/08 16/07/2008 Olga Oleksandrivna PERGAT 05/08/1973 Beryslav Beryslav Court, 26/06/2007, as amended by the Kherson Regional Court of Appeal on 13/11/2007 Manifestly ill-founded   44410/08 08/09/2008 Mykola Vasylovych TKACHOV 12/09/1976 Oleksandriya Court order of the Oleksandriya Court, 30/08/2007 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   48913/08 16/06/2008 Petr Mikhaylovich KORZHIKOV 12/07/1947 Chernigiv Desnyanskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 28/09/2005 Manifestly ill-founded   50601/08 09/10/2008 Nataliya Mykolayivna UKRAYINTSEVA 23/02/1966 Kirovograd Kirovograd Regional Court of Appeal, 03/12/2003 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   89/09 20/06/2008 Tamara Semenivna RUDYK   Chernigiv Desnyanskyy District Court of Chernigiv, 24/10/2007 No significant disadvantage   823/09 09/12/2008 Denis Denisovich GUMANYUK   Odesa Suvorovskyy District Court of Odesa, 27/09/2000 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2537/09 19/12/2008 Lyubov Petrivna BONDAREVA 21/08/1955 Velyka-Pysarivka Prymorskyy District Court of Odesa, 30/07/2004 Manifestly ill-founded   8062/09 27/01/2009 ZAVOD ZBVIK, VAT Makiyivka Dnipropetrovsk Commercial Court of Appeal, 24/12/2003 Six months   39156/09 09/07/2009 Antonina Yosyfivna GORDEYUK 02/10/1934 Lviv Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Lviv, 29/07/2008 Manifestly ill-founded   46466/09 13/08/2009 Mykola Vasylyovych GOMOLYAKO   Nizhyn Nizhyn Court, 14/07/2005 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   49347/09 03/09/2009 Vasyl Vasylyovych BARSUCHENKO 24/04/1946 Kyiv Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv 28/09/2007 Manifestly ill-founded   49563/09 03/09/2009 Leonid Vasylyovych PIDCHYBIY 02/05/1967 Kyiv Dniprovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 05/12/2005 No significant disadvantage   56702/09 09/10/2009 Andrey Anatolyevich KOLOMIYCHUK 10/03/1972 Razdolnoye 1) Rozdolne District Court of Crimea, 02/04/2008   2) Rozdolne District Court of Crimea, 21/09/2006 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) No significant disadvantage   13161/10 20/02/2010 Sergey Gennadiyevich NEFEDOV 11/04/1959 Zhovtneve Kalininskyy District Court of Donetsk, 30/03/2007 No significant disadvantage   20036/10 17/03/2010 Oleksandr Grygorovych KOLISNYK 15/05/1957 Kremenchuk Poltava Circuit Administrative Court, 21/04/2009 Manifestly ill-founded   20919/10 29/03/2010 Nataliya Protazovna GERTOVA 12/06/1954 Mykolayiv 1) Zavodskyy DIstrict Court of Myklayiv, 15/10/2003   2) Zavodskyy DIstrict Court of Myklayiv, 03/12/2004 Six months   24717/10 23/04/2010 Valeriy Mykolayovych VOLOSHYN 20/04/1953 Lugansk Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 16/10/2008   Manifestly ill-founded   36760/10 18/06/2010 Sergiy Dmytrovych AKULOV 03/04/1962 Cherkasy Mankivka Court, 03/12/2009 Manifestly ill-founded   61710/10 12/10/2010 Galina Danilovna PANCHIK 17/01/1939 Sevastopol   Mikhail Vasilyevich PANCHIK 14/10/1973 Sevastopol 1) Nakhimovskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 12/08/1998   2) Nakhimovskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 30/07/1999   3) Nakhimovskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 30/07/2003 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   2) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   3) No significant disadvantage   63416/10 15/10/2010 Nikolay Trofimovich TRETYAK   Alushta Alushta Court, 06/09/2007 Manifestly ill-founded   63844/10 21/10/2010 Andrey Yevgenyevich MIKHEYEV 24/12/1963 Molodizhne Zaliznychnyy District Court of Simferopol, 14/02/2008 Ratione personae   2343/11 19/11/2010 Svetlana Borisovna ALBUL 07/10/1969 Yevpatoriya Court of Appeal of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, 12/12/2005 Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies   5043/11 12/01/2011 Anatoliy Andriyovych FILIPOVYCH   Kyiv Kyiv Circuit Administrative Court, 29/09/2008 No significant disadvantage    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 3 décembre 2013
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1203DEC000261404
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral