CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG27
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 décembre 2013
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1203DEC001342006
- Date
- 3 décembre 2013
- Publication
- 3 décembre 2013
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s260B30F2 { width:16.02pt; display:inline-block } .sBF1D92B9 { width:173.61pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 13420/06 DIONYSOS MERENI and Others against the Republic of Moldova The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 3   December 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Valeriu Griţco, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 4 April 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They are represented by D.   Ciobanu, the administrator of the first applicant. The Moldovan Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr L. Apostol. The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the allegedly arbitrary deprivation of their property. In particular, they argued that the annulment of a sales contract between the applicant company and the other nineteen applicants had not been lawful. On 11   December 2008 the Court decided to communicate the application to the Government. On 13 September 2013 the applicants’ representative informed the Court that the applicants wanted to withdraw the application since the proceedings in their case had been extraordinarily reopened, following which their property right and the validity of the contract had been confirmed. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Marialena Tsirli   Luis López Guerra   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix         DIONYSOS MERENI, company registered in Chisinau     Eugenia SEVCISIN     Stepanida SEVCISIN     Eudochia COSONEA     Acsenia ZADEPSCHI     Boris ORIOL     Natalia ORIOL     Maria SAMBUJUC     Natalia ORIOL Tatiana ORIOL Ion ORIOL Vasile BOTNARI Vera BOTNARI Natalia ZADEPSCHI Anastasia ORIOL Maria GNILENCO Mihail BASS Varvara CLESCIOV Mihail CLESCIOV Iurie BOTNARI  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 27
- Date
- 3 décembre 2013
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1203DEC001342006
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral