CEDH · CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG — 12 décembre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s79DE5897 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s72C8F48C { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB355983 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s583D00FA { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt } .s26FF04E7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sBF5572D8 { width:178.54pt; display:inline-block } .s16D8D4DD { width:203.57pt; display:inline-block } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sEAE91340 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#eaeaea } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sFF24EEA3 { height:160.05pt } .sDC4C9BB { width:14.73pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sBACB86A2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s63D38A23 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:8pt } .s3133A7C8 { font-family:Arial; color:#0069d6 }     FIFTH SECTION                 CASE OF MALAKHOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE   (Application no. 35995/09 and 249 other applications)                   JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   12 December 2013           This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.     In the case of Malakhova and others v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,   Ann Power-Forde,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 November 2013, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.     The case originated in 250 applications (against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals and legal entities registered in Ukraine. Their details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”). 2.     In applications nos.   55551/09, 23720/11, 23883/11, 36094/11 and 12636/13 the applicants died in course of the proceedings before the Court. Their next-of-kin expressed a wish to pursue the applications. 3.     In application no. 7508/11 the decision was delivered in favour of the applicant’s deceased father. The applicant claims to be his lawful heiress. 4.     The Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy. 5.     On 26 March 2013 the applications were communicated to the Government. 6.     On 25 October 2013 the Court was informed that Mr   Viktor Gerasymovych Pogorilyy, the applicant in application no.   50491/11, had died on 29   May 2012. The applicant’s wife, Ms Nadiya Vasylivna Pogorila, expressed her wish to maintain the application of the deceased husband. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.     On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became final and enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time. 8.     Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     AS TO THE LOCUS STANDI OF Ms NADIYA VASYLIVNA POGORILA (THE WIFE OF THE APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No.   50491/11) 9.     The Court notes that application no. 50491/11 concerns a property right which is in principle transferable to the heirs, and that there are next of kin of the deceased applicant who wish to pursue the application. In these circumstances the Court considers that Ms Nadiya Vasylivna Pogorila, the   wife of the deceased applicant, has standing to continue the present proceedings in his stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine , no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006). II.     THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANTS IN APPLICATIONS Nos.   55551/09, 7508/11, 23720/11, 23883/11, 36094/11 and 12636/13 10.   In their observations to application no. 12636/13 the Government informed the Court that the applicant, Mrs   Valentina Melnikova, had died on 21 October 2011, after lodging the application. The Government claimed that the applicant’s daughter, Mrs Tatyana Vasko, who wished to support the application of her deceased mother, could not claim to be a victim in respect of the non-enforcement of the judgment given in favour of Mrs   Valentina Melnikova, as she did not become her legal successor. The Government did not raise objections as to the standing of the other applicants. 11.     The Court recalls that the concept of “victim” in Article 34 of the Convention must be interpreted autonomously and independently of domestic law concepts, such as for instance the capacity to bring or take part in legal proceedings (see, Greek Federation of Customs Officers, Gialouris and others v. Greece , no. 24581/94, Commission decision of 6 April 1995, DR 81-B, p. 127). The Court recalls that an application may be pursued in the name of a deceased person by a person of the required standing, such as a relative or an heir to the estate (see, among many other authorities, Ahmet Sadık v. Greece , judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996‑V, §§ 26; Zamula and Others v. Ukraine , no. 10231/02, §   34, 8 November 2005). Therefore the Government’s objections as to the lack of standing of Mrs Tatyana Vasko, the applicant’s daughter in application no. 12636/13, to pursue her application must be dismissed. 12.     The Court considers that the applicants’ heirs or next-of-kin in applications nos.   55551/09, 7508/11, 23720/11, 23883/11, 36094/11 and 12636/13 (see paragraphs 2 and 3 above) have standing to continue the proceedings in the applicants’ stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine , no. 19916/04, § 12, 14   December   2006,). III.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 13.     The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. They relied on, expressly or in substance, Articles   6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1. A.     Applications set out in Appendix 1 14.     In view of the similarity of the applications listed in Appendix 1 in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them. 15.     In their observations with respect to 2 applications, concerning the same debtor, the State-owned opened joint-stock company “Sodovyy Zavod”, the Government argued that the applicants did not suffer a significant disadvantage as the amounts awarded to them by the domestic decisions were lower than UAH 1,147 (around 110 euros), the minimum subsistence level for a person able to work, established by the Law “On the State Budget for the year 2013”. 16.     The Court notes that the domestic decisions in those 2 applications were delivered in 2005 and concerned salary arrears. At the material time the minimum salary was about UAH 300, while the lowest amount in question was UAH 868. The court also notes that the decisions remain unenforced for unreasonably long period of 8 years. Taking to consideration the abovementioned the Court, therefore, rejects the Government’s objection to the admissibility of those applications. 17.     The Court notes that the complaints of the applicants enumerated in Appendix 1 are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. 18.     The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible. 19.     Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, § §§ 56-58 and 66-70, 15 October 2009), the Court finds that in the applications listed in Appendix   1 there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement. B.     Application no. 35772/11 (Appendix 1, case no. 161) 20.     In application no. 35772/11 the applicants, Mr Aleksey Zorya and Mrs Valentina Zorya (husband and wife), complain about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment of the Donetsk Circuit Administrative Court dated 12 April 2010. The domestic court partly allowed the claim of the applicants and obliged the State authorities to issue Mr Aleksey Zorya a birth certificate with the correct date of his birth and to compensate him court expenses in the amount of UAH 1378 (equivalent of EUR 138). At the same time the claim of Mrs Valentina Zorya was rejected. The decision of the Donetsk Circuit Administrative Court remains unenforced. 21.     In their observations the Government informed the Court that Mrs   Valentina Zorya was not the creditor in respect of the enforceable and final judgment and she cannot, therefore, claim to be a victim of the alleged violations of the Convention. 22.     The Court agrees with the Government and declares this application as concerns the complaints of Mrs Valentina Zorya inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §   3 (a) of the Convention. 23.     The Court further finds that the decision in favour of Mr Aleksey Zorya was not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible. 24.     Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , no. 40450/04, § §§ 56-58 and 66-70, 15 October 2009), the Court finds that in the part of application no.   35772/11 lodged by Mr Aleksey Zorya there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decision in the applicant’s favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicant did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement. C.     Applications set out in Appendix 2 25.     The Court considers the applications set out in Appendix 2 should be joined, given their common factual and legal background. 1.     Applications nos. 10406/09 and 1516/11 26.     The Court notes that in applications nos. 10406/09 and 1516/11 the decisions of the domestic courts in the applicants’ favour remained unenforced for a certain period of time, for which the State authorities were responsible. In applications nos. 10406/09 and 1516/11 the decisions were fully enforced within 10 months (application no. 10406/09) and 6 months (application no. 1516/11) from the date when they had become enforceable. 27.     The   Court notes that in each case the period on non-enforcement is not such as to raise an arguable claim under the Convention. Furthermore, it is observed that the judgment debts did not concern the applicants’ basic subsistence and there were no other special, urgent circumstances that would lead to the conclusion that the delay in the enforcement of the judgments was unreasonable. 28.     It follows that applications nos. 10406/09 and 1516/11 are manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 § 4 of the Convention (see Soloshenko v.   Ukraine (dec.), no. 3952/04, 15 November 2005). 2.     Application no. 22841/11 29.     The Government submitted in their observations that the debtor in respect of the judgment at issue was a private legal entity. They maintained that the State was responsible for the non-enforcement in the applicants’ favour only insofar as the State Bailiffs’ Service was involved, while the applicants had not challenged before the domestic courts the Bailiffs’ alleged inactivity in the enforcement of their judgments. They further submitted that on 11 July 2012 the debtor was liquidated without a legal successor due to its bankruptcy and that the applicant had not challenged inactivity of the debtor’s liquidator before the domestic courts. The   Government maintained that, taking into account stated above, this application was inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded. The applicant disagreed. 30.     The Court notes the observations of the Government, comes to the same conclusions and declares the application inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. 3.     Application no. 12865/12 31.     The Court notes that in application no. 12865/12, the delay in enforcement concerned the payment of relatively small award (UAH   565 – equivalent of EUR 56) and the applicant did not submit any arguments or evidence to suggest that the delay in the payment of such awards had a significant impact on his personal live. The Court has previously found a lack of “significant disadvantage” in the cases, where the amount in question was equal or inferior to roughly EUR 500 (see, for instance, Gururyan v. Armenia (dec.), no. 11456/05, 24 January 2012; Ștefănescu v.   Romania (dec.), no. 11774/04, 12 April 2011). The Court finds that in present case the applicant did not suffer any significant disadvantage as a result of the non-enforcement of the final judgments. 32.     The Court also notes that “the respect for human rights”, as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto, does not require examination of the present complaint on the merits, as the problem of non-enforcement of final decisions has already been addressed in the Court’s pilot judgment against Ukraine adopted in the case of Yuriy Nikolaevich Ivanov v. Ukraine (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine , cited above) and in a number of other cases examined against Ukraine, which are moreover currently examined under “the well-established case-law procedure”. 33.     The Court further notes that the applicant’s case was duly considered by the domestic tribunal within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (b) with the decision favourable to the applicant. 34.     In view of the foregoing, the Court concludes that application no.   12865/12 should be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §   3 (b) of the Convention. 4.     Application no. 21465/11 35.     In application no. 21465/11 the applicant company challenges the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment adopted by the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal on 15 February 2010. 36.     In their observations the Government note that this application is the same as no. 2198/11, where the Court found a violation and awarded the applicant compensation for the lengthy non-enforcement of the same judgment (see Kharuk and others v. Ukraine [Committee], nos.703/05 and 115 other applications, Appendix 2, case no. 13 in the list of admissible cases, 26 July 2012). 37.     The Court agrees with the Government and declares application no.   21465/11 inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §   2 (b) of the Convention (substantially the same as application no.   2198/11). 5.     Applications nos. 14960/11 and 31247/11 38.     The debtor under the judgments in applications nos. 14960/11 and 31247/11 was a private company “Energovugillya” ( «Енерговугілля»). Until 30 July 2010 the company was protected from the creditors by the State (the enforcement proceeding against the debtor had to be suspended), as it was included in the Register of fuel and energy enterprises taking part in the procedure for recovery of debts pursuant to the 2005 Act “On   measures designed to ensure the stable functioning of fuel and energy enterprises”. These applications were lodged on 22 February 2011 (application no. 14960/11) and on 4 May 2011 (application no. 31247/11), that is more than six months after the date when the company was excluded from the Registry and thus after the responsibility of the Government for the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment was terminated. The Court, therefore, rejects applications nos. 14960/11 and 31247/11 as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §   1 of the Convention. 6.     Application no. 23463/11 39.     In application no. 23463/11 the applicant complains about the refusal of the State authorities to pay him pension and some special bonuses to it, as it had been awarded by the Galytskyy District Court of Lviv. 40.     In the observations the Government, providing copies of the relevant documents, proved that the relevant decision was duly enforced until 1   January 2008, when the Decree of the President no. 926, which served as a legal ground for awarding bonuses to the applicant’s pension, had become invalid. The Court notes that the Government provided some relevant evidences in support of their allegations. 41.     Considering the abovementioned the Court comes to a conclusion that the application is to be declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded pursuant to Article 35 §   3 (a) of the Convention. 7.     Application no. 25639/11 42.     In application no. 25639/11 the applicant complains about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment adopted by the Primorskyy District Court of Odesa on 23 December 2008. 43.     In their observations to the application the Government informed the Court that the decision of the Primorskyy District Court of Odesa was quashed by the Odesa Administrative Court of Appeal on 6 December 2011 (copy of the judgment provided). The Government proposed to declare application no. 25639/11 inadmissible ratione personae , as the applicant did not have an enforceable and final judgment adopted in his favour. Therefore he could neither complain of the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment, nor could he claim to be a victim of the alleged violations of his Convention rights. 44.     The Court notes that according to the Code of Civil Procedure the decision of the first instance court becomes enforceable, if not appealed against within the time limit for appeal or if the immediate enforcement is specially ordered by the first instance court in the law part of the decision. In present case the State authorities appealed against the decision of the first instance court and such decision did not become enforceable hence. In the course of the appeal proceedings the relevant decision was quashed by the higher court. The quashing was upheld by the court of cassation. 45.     Therefore the Court agrees with the argument of the Government that the decision of the Primorskyy District Court of Odesa did not become enforceable, so that the application is to be declared inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §   3 (a) of the Convention. IV.     OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 46.     Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention, which the Court has examined carefully. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 47.     It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. V.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 48.     Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 49.     In the present case, the Court considers it reasonable and equitable (see Kononova and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 11770/03 and   89 other applications, §   24, 6 June 2013; Tsibulko and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 65656/11 and   249 other applications, §   19, 20 June 2013; Pysarskyy and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 20397/07 and   164 other applications, §   24, 20 June 2013) to award 2,000 euros (EUR) to each of the applicants in Appendix 1 (to Mr Aleksey Zorya in application no.   35772/11). This sum is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses. 50.     The Court further notes that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the decisions which remain enforceable. 51.     The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.     Decides to join the applications set out in Appendix 1;   2.     Declares admissible the complaints of the applicants listed in Appendix   1 (Mr Aleksey Zorya only, the first applicant in application no. 35772/11), under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints and declares inadmissible the remainder of the applications;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   4.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article   13 of the Convention;   5.     Holds (a)   that within three months the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications enumerated in Appendix   1 (in application no.   35772/11 only to the first applicant, Mr Aleksey Zorya) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts, which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.   6 .     Decides to join the applications set out in Appendix 2, and to declare them inadmissible. Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 December 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX 1 (admissible applications)   No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence Relevant domestic decision     35995/09 23/06/2009 Nataliya Marativna MALAKHOVA 23/08/1960 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36026/09 25/06/2009 Yuriy Volodymyrovych FOMIN 05/01/1952 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36088/09 24/06/2009 Stepan Opanasovych TKACH 18/01/1956 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36444/09 23/06/2009 Tetyana Ivanivna MYNICH 02/02/1967 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36592/09 23/06/2009 Anzhela Vladyslavivna ZHYZNEVSKA 27/09/1961 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36601/09 24/06/2009 Olga Yuriyivna MYKYTYUK 05/09/1970 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36786/09 23/06/2009 Stepan Oleksiyovych SNITKO 27/10/1952 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     36935/09 30/06/2009 Vasyl Myronovych VELYDCHUK 20/09/1946 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007     37142/09 26/06/2009 Olena Viktorivna TOVYANSKA 27/02/1956 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37145/09 23/06/2009 Oleksiy Semenovych KASHAPOV 15/03/1949 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37148/09 22/06/2009 Lina Volodymyrivna SHYROKOVA 24/04/1964 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37175/09 23/06/2009 Viktor Mykolayovych RAKALOVYCH 22/02/1963 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37176/09 24/06/2009 Svitlana Volodymyrivna GOLOVCHUK 01/04/1961 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37179/09 01/07/2009 Sergiy Mykolayovych PROKOPCHUK 15/07/1955 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37180/09 24/06/2009 Stepan Vasylyovych ZAKHARCHUK 01/01/1948 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37182/09 24/06/2009 Anatoliy Mykolayovych YERESHCHENKO 15/09/1949 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37197/09 30/06/2009 Igor Volodymyrovych MATYUSHENKO 05/12/1966 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37265/09 23/06/2009 Lyudmyla Mykhaylivna KASHAPOVA 18/03/1955 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37274/09 01/07/2009 Sergiy Viktorovych BALASHKEVYCH 17/03/1958 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37388/09 26/06/2009 Yuriy Vasylyovych SHYROKOPOYAS 03/08/1963 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   37653/09 26/06/2009 Volodymyr Leonidovych TKACHENKO 20/08/1948 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   38653/09 09/07/2009 Yaroslav Andriyovych SLISARCHUK 02/06/1963 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   39514/09 30/06/2009 Galyna Vasylivna ZARYTSKA 13/11/1962 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   41353/09 30/06/2009 Iryna Mykolayivna RAFALSKA 02/10/1955 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   41835/09 21/07/2009 Olena Stanislavivna ZHYGANOVSKA 28/11/1966 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   41886/09 20/07/2009 Petro Oleksandrovych SHENIN 08/01/1950 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   51703/09 17/09/2009 Andriy Mykhaylovyvch KHUDYAKOV 21/09/1965 Zhytomyr 1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007   55551/09 01/10/2009 Stepan Yakovych KOSENKO 05/04/1933 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 22/11/2007   2066/10 29/12/2009 Yuliya Mykolayivna NEMEROVSKA 27/07/1987 Kulchytsi 1) Sambir Court, 18/06/2009   2) Sambir Court, 11/08/2009   2322/10 29/01/2009 Vasyl Mykolayovych SHCHERBAK 01/07/1941 Drogobych Drogobych Court, 27/06/2006   16164/10 09/03/2010 Nadiya Ignativna BUZYNSKA 16/02/1929 Zhytomyr Koroliovskyy District Court of Zhytomyr, 18/11/2009   19292/10 23/03/2010 Mykola Viktorovych SUTYAGA 08/12/1956 Kremenchuk Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 13/10/2008   4626/11 17/12/2010 Ivan Nikolayevich TEREMOV 23/09/1921 Lugansk Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 05/12/2006   6775/11 18/01/2011 Svetlana Sergeyevna BEREZNICHENKO 04/12/1977 Rovenki Rovenky Court, 26/03/2009   7508/11 20/01/2011 Olga Vasylivna MACHEK 04/03/1977 Kyiv Kakhovka Court, 23/11/2004   7563/11 21/01/2011 TEKHNOLOGIYA DLYA ZHIZNI, TOV Donetsk Donetsk Regional Commercial Court, 31/08/2009   9066/11 31/01/2011 Inokentiy Ivanovych CHELPANOV 23/02/1926 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 07/12/2007   13237/11 14/02/2011 Vladimir Ivanovich TARASOV 21/06/1946 Partenit 1) Alushta Court, 13/04/2001   2) Alushta Court, 03/06/2002   18822/11 12/03/2011 Oleksandr Vasylyovych LYCHAK 20/03/1981 Ivano-Frankivsk Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 25/01/2010   18948/11 12/03/2011 Lyudmyla Vasylivna LYCHAK 28/04/1962 Ivano-Frankivsk Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 25/01/2010   19023/11 12/03/2011 Vasyl Ivanovych LYCHAK 28/01/1959 Ivano-Frankivsk Ivano-Frankivsk Court, 25/01/2010   19275/11 25/12/2010 Mykola Mykhaylovych YAVOROVENKO 05/01/1949 Vinnytsya 1) Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 14/01/2010   2) Leninskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 16/11/2010   3) Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 25/11/2010   19325/11 21/03/2011 Anatoliy Leonidovych VERSHNYAK 05/09/1960 Nizhyn Chernigiv Regional Arbitration Court, 04/11/1999   21751/11 28/03/2011 DIG, TOV Donetsk Donetsk Regional Commercial Court, 06/05/2009   22205/11 23/03/2011 Svitlana Maksymivna LYPSKA 02/01/1944 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 22/11/2007   22218/11 27/03/2011 Sergiy Vasylyovych KOROBTSEV 11/04/1958 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 13/09/2007   22222/11 18/03/2011 Sergiy Georgiyovych ZGODNIK 12/02/1962 Vinnytsya Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 25/12/2006   22264/11 29/03/2011 Petro Mykhaylovych MOMOT 17/04/1959 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Regional Court of Appeal, 22/11/2006   22342/11 01/04/2011 Mykhaylo Musiyovych PROSKURNYA 28/11/1949 Kopyly Oktyabrskyy District Court of Poltava, 11/08/2010   22349/11 30/03/2011 Klavdiya Ignativna KHALIPA 02/10/1940 Lysychansk Lysychansk Court, 22/02/2005   22452/11 01/02/2011 Sergey Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV 02/10/1966 Krasnyy Luch Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/12/2009   22473/11 25/03/2011 Sergiy Stepanovych FAYER 18/05/1949 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 27/11/2007   22475/11 25/03/2011 Oleksiy Vasylyovych PSUY 15/03/1942 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 19/02/2008   22531/11 24/03/2011 Yuriy Nikolayevich MALYGIN 30/06/1967 Druzhkivka 1) Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/07/2008   2) Druzhkivka Court, 21/08/2008   3) Druzhkivka Court, 02/12/2008   4) Druzhkivka Court, 30/03/2009   5) Druzhkivka Court, 09/06/2009   6) Druzhkivka Court, 18/12/2009   7) Druzhkivka Court, 16/03/2010   22740/11 29/03/2011 Valentina Nikiforovna SUKHOMLIN 10/09/1933 Konotop Konotop Court, 01/11/2007   22816/11 31/03/2011 Aleksandr Ivanovich OLEYNIK 30/01/1938 Yalta Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine, 20/03/2007   23178/11 28/03/2011 Petro Yakovych KRYTSKYY 26/06/1960 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007   23260/11 29/03/2011 Vladimir Aleksandrovich LISHCHENKO 03/01/1952 Mariupol Prymorskyy District Court of Mariupol, 25/05/2009   23295/11 01/04/2011 Yana Viktorivna NIKOLAYEVA 09/06/1971 Kirovograd Kirovskyy District Court of Kirovograd, 13/05/2009   23466/11 01/04/2011 Yuriy Vasylyovych CHERKASOV 06/12/1962 Kramatorsk Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 28/02/2008   23682/11 05/04/2011 Vasyl Yuriyovych MAKSYMENKO 04/03/1942 Denykhivka Tetiyiv Court, 11/12/2007   23711/11 14/02/2011 Viktor Sergiyovych GRYSHKO 19/07/1964 Kalanchak Kalanchatskyy District Court of Kherson Region, 24/01/2008   23713/11 05/04/2011 Sergiy Vasylyovych SHKLYARENKO 23/10/1962 Tarashcha Tarashcha Court, 11/12/2007   23716/11 05/04/2011 Mykhaylo Illich IVANOV 23/11/1953 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 06/12/2007   23719/11 06/04/2011 Viktor Yosypovych GELBUTIVSKYY 25/01/1944 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 26/02/2008   23720/11 07/04/2011 Stepan Demyanovych TKACHUK 10/02/1942 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 07/12/2007   23722/11 04/04/2011 Ganna Opanasivna FEDORENKO 25/01/1931 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 09/01/2008   23725/11 01/04/2011 Mykola Petrovych OGORODNYK 27/05/1961 Stepove Tetiyiv Court, 29/01/2008   23729/11 01/04/2011 Leonid Danylovych NESKORODZHENYY 07/03/1953 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 14/11/2007   23734/11 07/04/2011 Stanislav Nikolayevich SHUMSKIKH 14/08/1953 Krasnyy Luch Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/05/2005   23735/11 07/04/2011 Valentina Vasilyevna SHVETS 05/02/1941 Krasnyy Luch Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/09/2009   23738/11 07/04/2011 Lyudmila Grigoryevna KARTASHOVA 01/06/1952 Vakhrushevo Krasnyy Luch Court, 13/05/2005   23740/11 07/04/2011 Valentina Alekseyevna KRYUKOVA 04/01/1949 Vakhrushevo 1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 15/03/2004   2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/05/2005   23851/11 29/03/2011 Mykola Volodymyrovych STANISHEVSKYY 22/05/1957 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 12/10/2007   23879/11 30/03/2011 Yuriy Vasilyevich SHEPELEV 15/03/1956 Dzerzhynsk Dzerzhynsk Court, 21/03/2006   23883/11 31/03/2011 Oleksandr Gennadiyovych MIKHYEYEV 16/11/1964 Oleksandriya Oleksandriya Court, 17/11/2008   23920/11 04/04/2011 Rostyslav Volodymyrovych BARANCHUK 11/10/1958 Klopochyn Ivanychivskyy District Court of Volyn Region, 20/11/2008   23993/11 01/04/2011 Valeriy Viktorovych TURYGIN 07/09/1960 Bila Tserkva Bila Tserkva Court, 03/12/2008,   24010/11 31/03/2011 Oleksandr Klymovych PIVCHUK 29/04/1952 Stadnytsya Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007   24012/11 31/03/2011 Mykola Volodymyrovych KOVALCHUK 06/08/1959 Telizhentsi Tetiyiv Court, 04/06/2008   24101/11 07/04/2011 Nataliya Mykolayivna PROKHASKO 03/04/1970 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 11/12/2007   24151/11 24/03/2011 Kateryna Fedorivna SERYK 01/12/1927 Tulygolove Krolevetskyy District Court of Sumy Region, 28/05/2009   24158/11 04/03/2011 Nikolay Pavlovich ZAKHAROV 01/05/1949 Kripenske 1) Commercial Court of Lugansk Region, 28/10/2005   2) Commercial Court of Lugansk Region, 19/04/2010   24213/11 02/03/2011 Nikolay Pavlovich ZAKHAROV 01/05/1949 Kripenske 1) Commercial Court of Lugansk Region, 19/07/2005   2) Commercial Court of Lugansk Region, 17/06/2010   24217/11 02/03/2011 Nikolay Pavlovich ZAKHAROV 01/05/1949 Kripenske 1) Commercial Court of Lugansk Region, 24/05/2004   2) Commercial Court of Lugansk Region, 17/06/2010   24663/11 11/04/2011 Petro Ivanovych CHYCHYRKO 25/07/1954 Ovruch Ovruch Court, 04/06/2009   25045/11 14/04/2011 Vitaliy Borysovych MATVIYENKO 29/01/1956 Berdychiv Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 15/05/2008   25077/11 14/04/2011 Vasyl Leonidovych OLEKSYUK 12/01/1972 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 17/07/2008   25222/11 15/04/2011 Vitaliy Ivanovych GERASYMENKO 30/03/1951 Kyiv Kyiv Circuit Administrative Court, 26/06/2008   25251/11 15/04/2011 Yuriy Semenovych MAMAYEV 15/06/1953 Lugansk 1) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 05/02/2010 (case no.   2a-4757/09)   2) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 05/02/2010 (case no.   2a-4758/09)   25509/11 14/04/2011 Ivan Tymofiyovych TKACHENKO 05/03/1942 Tarashcha 1) Tarashcha Court, 03/07/2007   2) Tarashcha Court, 14/04/2008   25513/11 15/04/2011 Tetyana Ulyanivna DEMKIV 01/04/1947 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 30/11/2007   25635/11 14/04/2011 Lyudmyla Oleksandrivna BOGACHEK 30/08/1949 Skadovsk Kherson Regional Court of Appeal, 24/07/2008   26208/11 11/04/2011 Iryna Arkadiyivna NICHKOVA 30/09/1964 Vinnytsya Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 26/03/2007   26524/11 15/04/2011 Mykola Fedorovych PATSYUK 23/08/1941 Tetiyiv Tetiyiv Court, 03/12/2007   26563/11 21/04/2011 Vyacheslav Mykolayovych KORNIYENKO 08/09/1957 Kashperivka Tetiyiv Court, 07/12/2007   26565/11 22/04/2011 Genadiy Vasylyovych ARKHIPENKOV 23/05/1957 Kramatorsk Kramatorsk Court, 25/06/2008   27413/11 22/04/2011 Anatoliy Eduardovych SHAPOVALOV 30/08/1959 Lugansk 1) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 06/08/2009   2) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 05/08/2010   3) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 23/03/2011   4) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 08/12/2008   5) Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 23/03/2011   6) Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 17/03/2011   7) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 08/08/2011   8) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 23/02/2011   9) Leninskyy District Court of Lugansk, 29/07/2011   27445/11 26/04/2011 Oleg Pavlovych TSYGANOK 18/02/1964 Vinnytsya Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 25/12/2006             27534/11 01/02/2011 Alla Yosypivna BYELOKOPYTOVA 01/01/1952 Chervonograd Chervonograd Court, 22/03/2010             27540/11 01/02/2011 Oksana Yevgenivna VOROZHBYT 08/06/1982 Chervonograd Chervonograd Court, 30/03/2010             27575/11 01/02/2011 Liliya Viktorivna GERUN 11/03/1968 Chervonograd Chervonograd Court, 22/03/2010             27588/11 01/02/2011 Mariya Stepanivna GRYNYUK 28/11/1957 Chervonograd Chervonograd Court, 15/03/2010             27598/11 01/02/2011 Larysa Vasylivna KARAPUDA 23/05/1958 Chervonograd Chervonograd Court, 15/03/2010             27603/11 01/02/2011 Nadiya Mykhaylivna LUTSIV 28/04/1964 Chervonograd Chervonograd Court, 25/03/2010             27829/11 21/04/2011 Nina Mykolayivna TOVMACH 16/01/1951 Ovruch Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 27/01/2009             28376/11 27/04/2011 Sergiy Mykhaylovych CHOBOTOK 16/05/1965 Kolomyya 1) Kolomyya Court, 06/11/2003   2) Kolomyya Court, 29/07/2004             28444/11 27/04/2011 Mykhaylo Valeriyovych OSOYANU 18/10/1966 Donetsk Donetsk Regional Commercial Court, 05/10/2009             29126/11 29/04/2011 Vasyl Omelyanovych NEVMERZHYTSKYY 01/01/1949 Levkovychi Ovruch Court, 11/06/2009             29131/11 29/04/2011 Vira Oleksiyivna CHYCHYRKO 14/05/1959 Zasky Ovruch Court, 05/06/2009             29261/11 18/03/2011 Oleksandr Petrovych KOVALCHUK 09/05/1936 Galayky Tetiyiv Court, 11/12/2007             29428/11 04/05/2011 Mariya Ivanivna BOKOVA 04/01/1947 Pervomayskyy Pervomaysk Court, 26/03/2008             29437/11 27/04/2011 Volodymyr Yosypovych PETEGYRYCH 12/11/1973 Zhytomyr Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 14/09/2007             29481/11 03/05/2011 Galyna Stanyslavivna SHEKERA 08/09/1924 Velykyy Kut Tarashchanskyy District Court of Kyiv Region, 15/05/2008             29575/11 27/04/2011 Tatyana Nikolayevna AVERYANOVA 16/06/1955 Kostyantynivka 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29582/11 27/04/2011 Nadezhda Vladimirovna AKUSHKO 19/08/1961 Kostyantynivka 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29590/11 27/04/2011 Natalya Fedorovna SHCHEPANOVSKAYA 14/09/1954 Kostyantynivka 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29603/11 27/04/2011 Sergey Vasilyevich BONDARENKO 02/09/1958 Kuzemyn Okhtyrka Court, 25/04/2008             29631/11 29/04/2011 Oleg Georgiyovych NEDORUBA 14/02/1950 Kryvyy Rig Kryvorizkyy District Court of Dnipropetrovsk Region, 30/05/2008             29634/11 27/04/2011 Bela Solomonovna FRIDMAN 14/04/1946 Kostyantynivka 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29656/11 27/04/2011 Vera Vladimirovna SEMINA 19/08/1961 Kostyantynivka 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29666/11 28/04/2011 Myroslava Yevgenivna ANDRYUSHYNA 11/03/1986 Krasnyy Luch Krasnyy Luch Court, 01/06/2009             29668/11 27/04/2011 Viktoriya Viktorovna LUKIYENKO 30/04/1950 Illicha 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29679/11 27/04/2011 Vasiliy Ivanovich LUKIYENKO 09/12/1948 Illicha 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009             29694/11 27/04/2011 Vitta Borisovna DONTSOVA 13/04/1940 Kostyantynivka 1) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 05/02/2007   2) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 20/01/2009   3) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 09/06/2009   4) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 01/12/2009   5) Labour Disputes Commission of State Enterprise "UkrNDI Skla", 04/10/2011             29699/11 29/04/2011 Oleksandr Vasylyovych NEVMERZHYTSKYY 10/07/1981 Ovruch Ovruch Court, 02/06/2009             29701/11 29/04/2011 Yevdokyya Yosypivna LEVKIVSKA 16/03/1932 Levkovychi Ovruch Court, 04/06/2009             29703/11 29/04/2011 Valentyna Vasylivna RYBINSKA 17/05/1976 Levkovychi Ovruch Court, 17/04/2009