CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 mars 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s260B30F2 { width:16.02pt; display:inline-block } .sF03B00FD { width:194.96pt; display:inline-block } .sFEE8C148 { width:13.68pt; display:inline-block } .s71A7415E { width:191.29pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .s9FB7202D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s3369E3E3 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sEF30FC22 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s299B0C57 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s67CDEFD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.4pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s14910781 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s5F906B66 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:5.28pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6CF83D49 { margin-left:11.67pt; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s7B15330 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding:5.28pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s73C6FB6B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:0.85pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sA0B2759 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sD2839F13 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:5.28pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7060A3B { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding:5.28pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFD82DC6 { margin-left:16.12pt; padding-left:1.73pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s71D4663F { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding:5.28pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB22A51C6 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding:5.28pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 40067/12 Milevka JOVANOVIĆ against Serbia and 9 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7   March 2014 as a Committee composed of:   Ján Šikuta, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar Having regard to the above applications lodged between 15 June 2012 and 12 April 2013, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants’ personal details are set out in the appended table. They are all represented before the Court by Ms S. Jokić, a lawyer practising in Čačak. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodić. Without invoking any Article of the Convention, the applicants complained about the respondent State’s failure to enforce final court decisions rendered in their favour against the same socially/State-owned company. The applicants also obtained decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia according to which the Constitutional Court held that the applicants had suffered a breach of their constitutional rights, awarded them certain sums as compensation for non-pecuniary damage and ordered the competent courts to bring the impugned enforcement proceedings to a conclusion as soon as possible. However, the final court judgments under consideration in this case remain unenforced to the present day. The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the appended table. Between 18 October 2013 and 20 December 2013 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 2,000 EUR (two thousand euros) less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the relevant Constitutional Court’s decision to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government would pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present cases (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights.   THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Marialena Tsirli   Ján Šikuta   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence nationality Final domestic decision details Enforcement order details Constitutional Court decision details, amount awarded as a compensation for non-pecuniary damage   40067/12 15/06/2012 Milevka JOVANOVIĆ 02/06/1946 Serbian Municipal Court in Čačak P1.br.68/2008 of 20 October 2008   Municipal Court in Čačak I.br.1415/09 of 9/10/2009 Už-1708/10 of 1 March 2012 200 Euros     54238/12 15/06/2012 Dragica MARKOVIĆ 08/09/1961 Serbian   Municipal Court in Čačak P. 68/08 of 20 October 2008   Municipal Court in Čačak I. 1415/09 of 09/10/2009   Už-1708/10 of 1 March 2012 200 Euros     54276/12 15/06/2012 Dušanka ŠKILJEVIĆ 15/06/1951 Serbian   Municipal Court in Čačak P1.br.68/2008 of 20 October 2008   Municipal Court in Čačak   I.br.1415/09 of 9/10/2009 Už-1708/10 of 1 March 2012 200 Euros     17706/13 21/02/2013 Radmila BOROVIĆ 30/12/1949 Serbian   Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.834/07 of 26 December 2008 Municipal Court in Čačak I.1361/09 of 29/09/2009 Už-1748/10 of 27 October 2012 300 Euros     21254/13 21/02/2013 Gordana DRAGIĆEVIĆ 08/04/1970 Serbian Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.834/07 of 26 December 2008   Municipal Court in Čačak I.1361/09 of 29/09/2009   Už-1748/10 of 31 October 2012 300 Euros     21260/13 21/02/2013 Dragiša KOJOVIĆ 27/12/1968 Serbian   Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.834/07 of 26 December 2008   Municipal Court in Čačak I.1361/09 of 29/09/2009   Už-1748/10 of 31 October 2012 300 Euros     21266/13 21/02/2013 Momčilo RADOVIĆ 17/04/1945 Serbian   Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.834/07 of 26 December 2008   Municipal Court in Čačak I.1361/09 of 29/09/2009 Už-1748/10 of 31 October 2012 300 Euros     23328/13 28/03/2013 Vesna POPOVIĆ 19/05/1962 Serbian   Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.1308/05 of 20 March 2006   Municipal Court in Čačak I.3075/06 of 25/08/2006   Už-1702/10 of 12 December 2012 600 Euros   25929/13 02/04/2013 Nadežda SIMOVIĆ 09/01/1957 Serbian Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.1308/05 of 20 March 2006   Municipal Court in Čačak I.3075/06 of 25/08/2006 Už-1702/10 of 12 December 2012 600 Euros   28864/13 12/04/2013 Slavica VIĆOVIĆ 27/09/1953 Serbian Municipal Court in Čačak P.1.1308/05 of 20 March 2006   Municipal Court in Čačak I.3075/06 of 25/08/2006   Už-1702/10 of 12 December 2012 600 Euros