CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 mars 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA5C4F8A9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s260B30F2 { width:16.02pt; display:inline-block } .sF03B00FD { width:194.96pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s25B97BCD { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .sD1CDDC62 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s8DB21C27 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s67CDEFD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.4pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .s26ADB50A { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s2F4AF114 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6CF83D49 { margin-left:11.67pt; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s898DAE93 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sB71F2881 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA0B2759 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .sBCA334AF { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s62945D10 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 47512/12 Momirka STJEPANOVIĆ against Serbia and 8 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 7   March   2014 as a Committee composed of:   Ján Šikuta, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged between 26 June 2012 and 19 November 2012, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants’ personal and other relevant details are set out in the appended table. They were all represented by Ms. R. Garibović, a lawyer practising in Novi Pazar.The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodić. Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complained about the respondent State’s failure to enforce final court decisions rendered in their favour against the same socially/State-owned company. The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the appended table. Between 16 October 2013 and 4 December 2013 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 2,000 EUR (two thousand euros) to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government would pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present cases (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlements reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlements are based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Marialena Tsirli   Ján Šikuta   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant name date of birth place of residence nationality Final domestic decision details Enforcement order details   47512/12 27/06/2012 Momirka STJEPANOVIĆ 29/04/1956 of BaH, Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 260/07 of 23 October 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1952/07 of 10/12/2007   48554/12 25/07/2012 Ljubinka KOSTIĆ 04/07/1955 Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 483/05 of 26 October 2005   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1492/05 of 21/10/2007   54672/12 13/08/2012 Ljiljana MAKSIMOVIĆ 10/07/1958 Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1.1054/04 of 8 November 2004 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 1117/04 of 24/01/2005   61450/12 19/09/2012 Nermina AGIĆ 28/05/1963 Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 160/03 of 8 December 2003 2. P1. 104/04 of 2 April 2004 3. P1. 913/04 of 5 January 2005 4. P1. 143/05 of 4 May 2005 5. P1 492/05 of 24 February 2006 6. P1. 132/07 of 6 March 2007 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 86/04 of 25/02/2004 2. I. 358/04 of 19/05/2004 3. I. 139/05 of 11/04/2005   I. 37/05 of 28/06/2005 4. I. 1135/05 of 26/09/2005 5. I. 417/06 of 17/05/2006 6. I. 1196/07 of 1/06/2007     63115/12 27/09/2012 Besim UGLJANIN 22/11/1950 Serbian   Municipal Cort in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 210/04 of 22 March 2005 2. P1. 488/05 of 28 September 2005 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I.1022/05 of 26/09/2005   I.141/06 of 14/02/2006 2.1934/05 of 27/12/2005   71981/12 07/11/2012 Adem NOKIĆ 01/06/1944 Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 944/07 of 5 May 2008 Court of First Instance in Novi Pazar 19 I. 1409/2011 of 15/07/2011   72413/12 29/10/2012 Bisera AGUŠEVIĆ 16/11/1960 Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1 161/03 of 24 September 2003 2. P1. 106/04 of 10 March 2004 3. P1. 928/04 of 1 March 2005 4. P1. 501/05 of 30 September 2005 5. P1. 219/06 of 13 April 2006 Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 904/03 of 27/01/2004 2. I. 281/04 of 10/05/2004 3. I. 665/05 of 23/06/2005 4. I. 1216/05 of 28/12/2005   I. 1041/05 of 26/09/2005 5. I. 1099/06 of 15/08/2006   76646/12 19/11/2012 Indira DUPLJAK 01/05/1967 Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. P1. 35/05 of 20 March 2005 2. P1. 423/05 of 4 October 2005 3. P1. 318/06 of 25 May 2006 4. P1. 373/07 of 21 May 2007   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar 1. I. 612/05 of 21/06/2005   I. 990/05 of 26/09/2005 2. I. 175/06 of 20/02/2006 3. I. 1104/06 of 21/08/2006 4. I. 1348/07 of 25/06/2007     49043/13 26/06/2012 Mevljuda NIŠIĆ 26/07/1964 of BaH,Serbian   Municipal Court in Novi Pazar P1. 1136/06 of 16 March 2007 (as amended on 26/03/2007) Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I.792/07 of 3/05/2007