CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 6 mai 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s701081D1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:left } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s4DFDBCC7 { width:188.96pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 3243/08 Radik Davlyatovich KARAMOV against Russia and 4 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 6   May   2014 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Erik Møse, judges, and André Wampach, Deuty Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates indicated in the appendix, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The applicants complained, among other matters, under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions of their detention in Russian penitentiary facilities. These complaints were communicated to the Government, who on 24   May 2013 submitted their observations. These submissions were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their observations in reply. On various dates the above letters returned to the Court as unclaimed or undeliverable due to a change of the recipients’ addresses. Although the applicants knew that they had the obligation to inform the Court of any change in their addresses and about any major developments regarding their cases, they did not provide the Court with such information. THE LAW According to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The Court considers that the applicants’ failure to inform the Registry about the change of their addresses despite such explicit obligation highlighted in the Registry’s letters must be taken to indicate that they have lost interest in the proceedings, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of these cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike them out of its list of cases. André Wampach   Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence   3243/08 01/11/2007 Radik Davlyatovich KARAMOV 06/10/1971 Perm     16222/09 04/05/2009 Sergey Vladimirovich GERMANOV 17/01/1965 Uryupinsk     34359/12 10/01/2012 Oleg Aleksandrovich KITAYEV 11/08/1969 Voronezh     34579/12 23/10/2011 Yuriy Alekseyevich KUZIN 12/04/1968 Klekotki     71657/12 09/12/2009 Eduard Valeryevich ZHERNAKOV 24/09/1969 Tver