CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 27 mai 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB81E279F { width:179.94pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s6674DD39 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; list-style-position:inside } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43781/12 Viktor Nikolayevich IVANCHENKO against Ukraine and 7 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27   May   2014 as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,   Ann Power-Forde,   Vincent A. De Gaetano, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Rˆegistrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates stated in the annexed table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases submitted on the various dates stated in the annexed table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The applicants complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the length of proceedings. The applications were communicated to the Government. On the various dates stated in the annexed table the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Ukraine in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the annexed table to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that might be applicable. The sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW The Court takes note, for each case, of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX     No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Nationality Date of declaration (Government) Date of declaration (Applicant) Sum awarded   43781/12 14/05/2012 Viktor Nikolayevich IVANCHENKO 14/10/1967 Artemivsk Ukrainian   19/12/2012 22/10/2013 1,200 EUR   78039/12 23/11/2012 Mykola Illich PAVLYUK 02/10/1960 Sukhodilsk Ukrainian   14/11/2013 30/10/2013 3,900 EUR   16793/13 09/02/2013 Sergey Ivanovich MAKAROV 19/09/1959 Dnipropetrovsk Ukrainian   01/11/2013 30/09/2013 1,200 EUR   22032/13 19/03/2013 ARKADIYA PKT, TOV Sevastopol Ukrainian   Represented by Sergey Anatolyevich ZAYETS 01/11/2013 04/10/2013 2,400 EUR   27187/13 09/04/2013 Valeriy Mikhaylovich RUKHLENKO 17/08/1952 Gorlivka Ukrainian   24/10/2013 08/10/2013 500 EUR   35265/13 22/05/2013 Nadiya Bogdanivna FOKIY 08/06/1955 Chernivtsi Ukrainian   Vasyl Petrovych FOKIY 08/06/1955 Chernivtsi Ukrainian   Represented by Bogdan Vasylyovych FOKIY 24/10/2013 25/10/2013 400 EUR jointly   35637/13 22/04/2013 Alla Vasilyevna KOPYLOVA 11/10/1961 Minsk Belarusian 01/11/2013 28/10/2013 1,200 EUR   42635/13 19/06/2013 Oleg Petrovich USHAKOV 03/06/1953 Balta Ukrainian 24/10/2013 10/10/2013 1,200 UER