CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 juin 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s4DFDBCC7 { width:188.96pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s15514A1D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 15338/06 Andrey Vladimirovich OKHAPKIN against Russia and fifteen other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 17   June 2014 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Dmitry Dedov, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates listed in the appendix, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the Government and the applicants’ acceptance of their terms, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. 2.     The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.     The applicants complained, in particular, about the conditions of their detention in Russian penitentiary facilities, the conditions of their transport, and an excessive length of their detention on remand. 4.     By letters submitted on various dates, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by the applications. They acknowledged that the applicants had been detained or transported in the conditions which did not comply with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention, and that the length of certain applicants’ detention had been excessive in the light of the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. The Government stated their readiness to pay the following amounts to the applicants as just satisfaction: 3,500 euros (EUR) to Mr   Okhapkin, EUR   4,805 to Mr   Rasskazov, EUR 4,090 to Ms Molkova, EUR 9,940 to Mr   Maksimov, EUR   15,940 to Mr Ibragimov, EUR 4,500 to Mr Safarov, EUR   8,125 to Mr   Deryugin, EUR 14,500 to Mr Inozemtsev, EUR 7,475 to Mr   Belous, EUR   4,000 to Mr Fazlutdinov, EUR 4,200 to Mr   Filippov, EUR   4,740 to Mr   Kravchenko, EUR 5,750 to Mr   Kundilovskiy, EUR   6,077 to Mr   Ryzhkov, EUR 3,500 to Mr Sokolov, and EUR 4,675 to Mr   Shestakov. The payment was to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, together with any costs and expenses incurred, as well as any tax that may be chargeable. It would be effected within a period of three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay within that period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment would constitute the final resolution of the cases. 5.     In their letters of different dates, the applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the Government’s declarations. THE LAW 6.     Having regard to the similarity of the main issues under the Convention in the above cases, the Court decides to join the applications and examine them in a single decision. 7.     The Court considers that the applicants’ agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government shall be considered as a friendly settlement between the parties (see Cēsnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no.   9278/06, §   34, 6 March 2012, and Bakal and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no.   8243/08, 5   June 2012). 8.     The Court therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. 9.     In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to join the applications, Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. André Wampach   Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   15338/06 28/02/2006 Andrey Vladimirovich OKHAPKIN 10/09/1981 Severniy     18533/06 14/03/2006 Vladimir Valeryevich RASSKAZOV 03/11/1979 Schuya     42913/06 03/10/2006 Zinaida Nikiforovna MOLKOVA 07/11/1967 Cheboksary Nikolay Anatolyevich MULYAKOV   10855/07 20/01/2007 Aleksandr Yuryevich MAKSIMOV 26/05/1969 Bor Sergey Ivanovich KIRYUKHIN   23258/07 07/04/2007 Rushan Zubairovich IBRAGIMOV 07/01/1963 Astrakhan Margarita Vladimirovna GORDEYEVA   47545/08 04/10/2008 Marufkhodzha Ismoilovich SAFAROV 17/06/1962 Ocher Boris Ivanovich PONOSOV   49410/08 03/09/2008 Aleksandr Viktorovich DERYUGIN 21/09/1981 Zamishevo Viktor Petrovich GAVRILENKO   49555/08 20/08/2008 Mikhail Yuryevich INOZEMTSEV 01/06/1983 Orenburg       7022/10 05/01/2010 Aleksandr Sergeyevich BELOUS 01/01/1981 Yekaterinburg               51206/10 17/06/2010 Ruslan Rustamovich FAZLUTDINOV 13/07/1985 Ivanayevo               5361/12 27/12/2011 Dmitriy Anatolyevich FILIPPOV 24/11/1985 Tomsk               9062/12 11/01/2012 Maksim Valeryevich KRAVCHENKO 21/12/1982 St Petersburg               17746/12 24/01/2012 Eduard Vitalyevich KUNDILOVSKIY 24/10/1977 Bataysk               20146/12 16/03/2012 Aleksandr Vladimirovich RYZHKOV 24/05/1983 St Petersburg Aleksey Vladimirovich DOBRODEYEV             34302/12 14/12/2007 Vladimir Nikolayevich SOKOLOV 26/04/1957 Startsevo               59398/12 30/07/2007 Yuriy Gennadyevich SHESTAKOV 18/06/1979 Perm