CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 24 juin 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sBAD0D18F { width:1.87pt; display:inline-block } .sC9D6F765 { width:209.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2EBECB52 { font-family:Arial; font-size:9pt; list-style-position:inside } .sA0D17C33 { width:1.64pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 33607/07 Ljubomir TOFILOVSKI and others against Serbia and 3 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 24   June   2014 as a Committee composed of:   Ján Šikuta, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged between 28 July 2007 and 19 May 2008, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodić. The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the length of their respective criminal and civil proceedings. Between 20 October 2013 and 25 November 2013 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts specified in the appended table to cover any and all non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants, which will be converted into national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment. These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. The parties, furthermore, agreed that the Government will ensure that all necessary steps are taken to allow the domestic proceedings under consideration in the cases in which the final decisions are still pending to be concluded as speedily as possible, taking into account the requirements of the proper administration of justice. THE LAW The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the applications out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Marialena Tsirli   Ján Šikuta Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix   No. Application No. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by Friendly settlement amount (non-pecuniary damage + costs and expenses)   33607/07 28/07/2007 Ljubomir TOFILOVSKI 07/05/1948 Beograd   Novica ILIĆ 25/07/1949 Dolovo   Milovan BLANUŠA 20/07/1950 Umka   Vladimir VUJIČIĆ 29/03/1948 Beograd   Cvetko NEDELJKOVIĆ 18/10/1947 Kragujevac   Miodrag MILENKOVIĆ 11/09/1943 Ovča   Nikola MUTIĆ 20/03/1950 Nova Pazova   Čedomir MILJKOVIĆ 3,120 euros to each applicant for non-pecuniary damage + 500 euros jointly to the applicants for costs and expenses   50574/07 10/10/2007 Nenad GLADOVIĆ 26/08/2007 Beograd   Predrag SAVIĆ 2,730 euros + 500 euros   7102/08 28/01/2008 Vesna HASANAGIĆ 16/02/1987 Nadalj   Julka PURAĆ-HASANAGIĆ 1,800 euros + 500 euros   27281/08 19/05/2008 Remka HAMIDOVIĆ 03/10/1953 Novi Pazar     1,800 euros for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses