CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 13 janvier 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s4DFDBCC7 { width:188.96pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 9929/05 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich STAVROPOLTSEV against Russia and 16 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 13   January 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Dmitry Dedov, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants are Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated below. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. The facts of the cases and the complaints may be summarized as follows: The applicants were parties to civil or criminal proceedings that took place in courts of ordinary jurisdiction in various regions of Russia. The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention, Article   1 of Protocol   1 and/or Article 13 of the Convention, invoking the following Convention issues: - quashing of the final judgments in the applicants’ favour by way of a supervisory review (cases nos.   9929/05, 20670/05, 33678/05 and 511/06); - non-enforcement of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour and about its subsequent quashing by way of supervisory review (case   no.   12763/05); - unreasonable length of the civil proceedings and the lack of effective domestic remedies against excessive length of court proceedings (cases nos.   28632/05, 49033/06, 49062/06, 2125/07, 3504/07 and 21166/07); - unreasonable length of the criminal proceedings and the lack of effective domestic remedies against excessive length of court proceedings (cases   nos.   8864/06, 8933/06, 43122/06 and 2019/07); and - non-enforcement of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour (cases   nos.   23189/06 and 50213/06). The applicants’ complaints concerning the above-mentioned issues were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No replies were received to the Registry’s letters from the applicants. By separate letters sent by registered post on various dates in 2009 ‑ 2013, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested. In cases nos.   50213/06 and 21166/07, the Government informed the Court about the applicants’ death. In this connection the Court sent letters, seeking information from the applicants’ heirs or family members whether they wish to pursue the proceedings of these cases before the Court. No replies followed. The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicants do not intend to pursue the applications. However, no responses have been received. THE LAW The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article   37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 5 February 2015. André Wampach   Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   9929/05 03/02/2005 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich STAVROPOLTSEV 03/02/1983 Syzran       12763/05 14/03/2005 Olga Vladimirovna SHILO 27/05/1965 Aykhal       20670/05 23/04/2005 Svetlana Arkadevna VARSHETSKAYA 07/08/1986 Volsk       28632/05 25/07/2005 Irina Ivanovna SHESTAKOVA 07/11/1960 Vladimir       33678/05 10/08/2005 Ivan Anatolyevich DAVYDYUK 11/06/1987 Syzran       511/06 16/11/2005 Sergey Vladimirovich DYULDIN 12/06/1968 Samara Yevgeniy Vladimirovich DYULDIN 16/01/1974 Samara Stanislav Viktorovich YUNOSHEV   8864/06 11/02/2006 Anatoliy Vasilyevich BORISOV 19/08/1954 Sovetsk       8933/06 01/02/2006 Oleg Yanovich TELIDIS 03/03/1968 Vladivostok   Alla Aleksandrovna TELIDI   23189/06 07/04/2006 Sergey Vladimirovich KOLOSOV 13/12/1979 Elista                 43122/06 10/08/2006 Azat Marsovich SAFIN 23/12/1970 Ufa                 49033/06 11/10/2006 Larisa Vladimirovna KOMAROVA 02/09/1967 Severobaykalsk   Yuriy Veniaminovich BOGDANOV             49062/06 25/10/2006 Nikolay Vladimirovich ROMANOV 24/09/1941 Artem                 50213/06 31/10/2006 Nikolay Nasunovich TARVENOV 25/12/1966 Date of demise 11/09/2011 Akhnud               2019/07 24/11/2006 Oleg Nikolayevich KAZAKOV 24/09/1963 Ryazan                 2125/07 18/11/2006 Yuriy Mikhaylovich BRAUDE-ZOLOTAREV 19/01/1929 Moscow   Yuliya Goroldovna KOVSHAROVA             3504/07 30/11/2006 Oleg Vladimirovich SANNIKOV 31/01/1978 Ust-Luga                 21166/07 28/02/2007 Irina Kuzminichna CHURSINA 01/09/1923 Date of demise 06/12/2007 Taganrog