CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 3 février 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sBAD0D18F { width:1.87pt; display:inline-block } .sC9D6F765 { width:209.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .sB17702CF { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s90CF7188 { margin-right:9.05pt; margin-left:9.05pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .sB5A0042F { height:7.3pt } .s6ADBC335 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:2.48pt 2.48pt 2.48pt 3.88pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sA9245398 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.4pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .sABFE2A6E { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:2.48pt 2.48pt 2.48pt 3.88pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2EBECB52 { font-family:Arial; font-size:9pt; list-style-position:inside } .sA0D17C33 { width:1.64pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sB217F55E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:9pt } .s9EA2759 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; text-align:justify; font-size:9pt } .sCD6EE8B1 { height:47.1pt } .s7ECB4500 { height:39.2pt } .sB5536D70 { height:46.35pt } .s39E90776 { height:58.5pt } .s29A8756B { height:57.75pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 80131/12 Milanka STANKOVIĆ against Serbia and 18 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 3   February 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Ján Šikuta, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged between 10 December 2012 and 12 April 2013, Having regard to the observations submitted by the parties, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS A list of the applicants with their personal details is set out in the appendix. They were all represented by Mr. N. Antić, a lawyer practising in Vladičin Han. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodić. A.     The facts as submitted by the applicants The applicants are former employees of DP PK Delišes (the debtor) , a socially-owned company. They all obtained final court judgments ordering the debtor to pay them certain sums. At their request to that effect, they were issued enforcement orders in respect of these judgments. The details of the judgments and enforcements orders are in the appended table. The enforcement has never been carried out. B.     The facts submitted by the Government The Government informed the Court that all the applicants withdrew their claims for the enforcement of the judgments on various dates between 5 April 2005 and 9 July 2013, which had as a result the termination of the respective enforcement proceedings. The applicants did not lodge appeals against these decisions. The dates of the withdrawals of the requests for enforcement and the dates of the termination of the enforcement proceedings are in the appended table. COMPLAINT The applicants essentially complained about the non-enforcement of the judgments rendered in their favour. These complaints fall to be examined under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1. THE LAW The Government asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible as an abuse of the right of petition. They pointed out that the applicants omitted to inform the Court that the enforcement proceedings had been terminated at their request. The applicants did not dispute having withdrawn their requests for enforcement and having failed to appeal the decisions on termination of the enforcement proceedings, but argued that it was irrelevant. The Court reiterates that an application may be rejected as an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on false information (see Kerechashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006; Bagheri and Maliki v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 30164/06, 15 May 2007; Poznanski and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 25101/05, 3 July 2007; and Simitzi-Papachristou and Others v. Greece (dec.), no. 50634/11, § 36, 5   November 2013) or if significant information and documents were deliberately omitted, either where they were known from the outset (see Kerechashvili , cited above) or where new significant developments occurred during the procedure (see Predescu v. Romania , no. 21447/03, §§   25-27, 2 December 2008; and Tatalović and Dekić v. Serbia (dec.), no.   15433/07, 29 May 2012). Incomplete and therefore misleading information may amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information in question concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Hüttner v. Germany (dec.), no. 23130/04, 9 June 2006; Poznanski   and   Others , cited above; Predescu , cited above, §§ 25-26; and Komatinović v.   Serbia (dec.), no. 75381/10, 29 January 2013). The Court notes that the present applicants complained that final court judgments rendered in their favour against a socially-owned company had not been enforced. However, they withdrew their requests for enforcement of these judgments between 5 April 2005 and 9 July 2013, which led to the final termination of the enforcement proceedings. The applicants’ complete silence on the termination of the enforcement proceedings while upholding their allegations that the judgments had not been enforced due to the debtor’s restructuring cannot be interpreted, in the Court’s view, as anything else but a failure to disclose information concerning the very core of the applications. Having regard to the importance of the applicants’ failure to disclose this information for the proper determination of the present cases, the Court finds that such conduct was contrary to the purpose of the right of individual petition, as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention (see Gross v.   Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014). In view of the above, it is appropriate to reject the applications as an abuse of the right of petition, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications inadmissible.   Done in English and notified in writing on 26 February 2015.   Marialena Tsirli   Ján Šikuta Deputy Registrar   President Appendix   No. App No. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Final domestic decision details Enforcement order details Date of withdrawal of the request for enforcement Date of termination of enforcement proceedings   80131/12 10/12/2012 Milanka STANKOVIĆ 19/08/1954 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 7 October 2003 8 April 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 10 December 2003 26 January 2005 10 May 2005 31 May 2005 7 June 2005   80160/12 10/12/2012 Borivoje STEVANOVIĆ 15/10/1956 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 21 October 2003 4 March 2003 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 16 January 2004 3 September 2004 21 April 2008   10 June 2008   7630/13 15/01/2013 Ljubinka TASIĆ 25/09/1950 Vladičini Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 13 August 2003 22 January 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 26 December 2003 2 March 2004 18 May 2005   31 May 2005 23 June 2005   7749/13 14/12/2012 Branka MITROVIĆ 17/06/1967 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 1 October 2003 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 13 May 2004 14 April 2005 10 June 2005   7756/13 13/12/2012 Boža MOMČILOVIĆ 07/11/1970 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 27 January 2004 19 March 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 19 March 2004 28 April 2004 9 July 2013 11 July 2013 15 March 2006   7773/13 18/12/2012 Mladenka VOJINOVIĆ 15/10/1952 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 29 August 2003 29 January 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 29 October 2003 31 March 2004 5 April 2005 21 April 2005 19 April 2005   8177/13 16/01/2013 Slavica DIMITRIJEVIĆ 08/10/1970 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 26 August 2003 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 3 September 2004 6 April 2005 21 April 2005   8424/13 25/01/2013 Dejan STANKOVIĆ 01/06/1972 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 2 June 2003 10 February 2004 2 June 2003 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 13 October 2003 3 September 2004 23 October 2003 20 May 2005 10 June 2005 22 June 2005 16 March 2006   8778/13 23/01/2013 Miodrag MILJKOVIĆ 15/06/1968 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 3 October 2003 2 February 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 17 December 2003 21 April 2004 13 April 2005 20 March 2006 20 April 2005   8785/13 23/01/2013 Miroslava VELJKOVIĆ 29/12/1966 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 1 July 2003 4 June 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 17 December 2003 30 August 2004 5 April 2005 21 April 2005 No. App No. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Final domestic decision details Enforcement order details Date of withdrawal of the request for enforcement Date of termination of enforcement proceedings   14998/13 21/02/2013 Jasmina TAŠIĆ 01/05/1962 Zitorađe, Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 23 June 2003 21 June 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 10 March 2004 3 September 2004 13 April 2005 13 May 2005 30 May 2005 22 June 2005   15167/13 28/01/2013 Predrag STOŠIĆ 24/10/1968 Repince, Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 23 October 2003 19 February 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 31 December 2009 19 March 2004 6 May 2005 31 May 2005 22 June 2005   15169/13 28/01/2013 Milevka STOŠIĆ 17/10/1972 Repince, Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 23 October 2003 29 January 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 31 December 2003 19 March 2004 6 May 2005 18 May 2005 24 October 2005 30 May 2005   16915/13 01/03/2013 Slavko MILJKOVIĆ 24/05/1955 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 9 June 2003 19 May 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 12 September 2003 10 March 2005 13 April 2005 21 April 2005 20 April 2005   16932/13 01/03/2013 Terezija MILJKOVIĆ 06/03/1958 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 1 July 2004 9 June 2003 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 10 March 2005 12 September 2003 10 April 2005 14 April 2005 21 April 2005 27 May 2005   28852/13 12/04/2013 Jelka STOJANOVIĆ 10/09/1950 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 31 March 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 30 April 2004 20 April 2005 15 June 2005   30027/13 12/04/2013 Zorica STANKOVIĆ 15/10/1967 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 3 March 2004 1 March 2005 9 June 2003 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 4 June 2004 16 January 2005 18 November 2003 10 August 2009   29 September 2009 5 October 2009 16 March 2006   30032/13 12/04/2013 Ljubomir STOJKOVIĆ 10/07/1961 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 1 January 2010 3 February 2004 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 30 December 2009 19 March 2004 23 April 2008 24 July 2008 6 March 2006   30033/13 12/04/2013 Sava HRISTOV 04/04/1950 Vladičin Han Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 5 November 2003 29 March 2004 11 February 2005 Municipal Court in Vladičin Han 2 March 2004 28 December 2004 31 March 2005 18 May 2005 23 June 2005 30 May 2005 7 June 2005