CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG25
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 7 avril 2015
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407DEC002018613
- Date
- 7 avril 2015
- Publication
- 7 avril 2015
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sFC33EBC3 { width:26.21pt; display:inline-block } .s7B2AF660 { width:91.22pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s12001E73 { width:142.23pt; display:inline-block } .s9E10B953 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sAEB48DD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sD0715D08 { width:82.22%; margin-left:23.05pt; border-collapse:collapse } .s16392215 { width:10.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF9C0A319 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sB0E7915E { width:28.32%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s89CFC327 { width:30.42%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s52CBF179 { width:10.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3248109E { margin-left:33.01pt; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .sDCEA7AFA { width:28.32%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s84912FD7 { width:30.42%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s74DC3D21 { margin-left:33.01pt; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 20186/13 Maria Cidália RODRIGUES DE FREITAS and others against Portugal The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 7 April 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Ksenija Turković, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 March 2013, Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government on 7 October 2014 requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicants’ reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They were represented before the Court by Ms A. Gonçalves, a lawyer practising in Leiria. The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney-General. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings to which they were a party. The application was communicated to the Government. After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, by letter dated 7   October 2014 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by the application. They acknowledged a violation of the applicants’ rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. They undertook to pay each applicant EUR   13,000 (thirteen thousand euros) to cover any non-pecuniary damage and to jointly pay them EUR 1,000 (one thousand euros) to cover costs and expenses, which will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. They further requested the Court to strike out the application. On 12 February 2015, the Court received a letter from the applicants informing the Court that they had agreed to the terms of the Government’s declaration. THE LAW The Court finds that following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government the case should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties. It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases pursuant to Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 30 April 2015.   André Wampach   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska   Deputy Registrar   President Appendix     N o . First name LAST NAME Birth date Place of residence   Maria Cidália RODRIGUES DE FREITAS 09/12/1962 Funchal, Madeira   Assunção DE NÓBREGA GOUVEIA 15/08/1952 Caniço, Madeira   Teresa Sofia NÓBREGA GOUVEIA 15/10/1976 Caniço, Madeira    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 25
- Date
- 7 avril 2015
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407DEC002018613
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral