CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 18 juin 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5A29A8C7 { width:12.53pt; display:inline-block } .s460B86C9 { width:198.42pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s71DBEFB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:19.85pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-19.85pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s8BB6D734 { margin-right:9pt; margin-left:9pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .s1ACE6575 { height:33.55pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s669896CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:13.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s82A78467 { text-align:justify; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .s97296F0 { width:0.81pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sEE3B17D3 { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .s16ABE128 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .sF3108B01 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 26380/11 Dragoş Mihai IONESCU against Romania and 9 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 18 June 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Johannes Silvis,   Valeriu Griţco, judges, and Karen Reid, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table, to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 9 July 2015.   Karen Reid   Luis López Guerra   Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant Date of birth Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount (in euros per applicant or jointly when the case)   26380/11 13/04/2011 Dragoș Mihai IONESCU 03/08/1951 24/02/2015 16/01/2015 3,600   54908/11 24/08/2011 Mihail GEORGEVICI 02/09/1949 Lucian GEORGEVICI 06/11/1981 11/02/2015 27/01/2015 2,300 jointly   1167/12 12/12/2011 Gheorghe GHIURĂU 05/09/1963 24/02/2015 14/01/2015 1,500   25438/12 20/04/2012 Gheorghe FOICA 31/01/1964 25/02/2015 27/01/2015 2,400   40345/12 05/06/2012 Aurelian Daniel MUNTEAN 19/12/1977 19/03/2015 12/01/2015 2,000   73378/12 01/11/2012 Dorin Eliodor PĂUN 23/10/1969 19/03/2015 05/01/2015 1,800   41739/13 19/06/2013 Florian-Alexandru MĂRCULESCU 23/03/1952 19/03/2015 21/01/2015 3,000   55943/13 27/08/2013 Benoni BECA 11/07/1961 20/02/2015 16/01/2015 2,400   58358/13 27/08/2013 Mihai JUNCU 19/07/1973 23/02/2015 14/01/2015 2,400   59643/13 16/09/2013 Ștefan RIZA 05/11/1954 23/02/2015 21/01/2015 6,600