CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG29
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 20 octobre 2015
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC006340313
- Date
- 20 octobre 2015
- Publication
- 20 octobre 2015
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sBF964C40 { width:8.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E304268 { width:190.42pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 63403/13 ZOLOTYY MANDARYN OYL, TOV against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 20   October 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Angelika Nußberger, President,   Boštjan M. Zupančič,   Vincent A. De Gaetano, judges, and Milan Blaško, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 14 September 2013, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Zolotyy Mandaryn Oyl, TOV, is a legal entity registered in Ukraine. The applicant company was represented before the Court by Mr   Igor Karaman, a lawyer practicing in Kyiv. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, most recently Mr Borys Babin, of the Ministry of Justice. The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment adopted in the applicant’s favour. On 22 July 2015 the Court received a letter from the Government stating that the applicant did not wish to pursue its application as a result of a friendly settlement agreement signed on 22 July 2015 between the applicant and the Government. A copy of the agreement was attached to the letter, the relevant parts read as follows: “...the Government of Ukraine will pay the debt still owed to the applicant under the decision of the Kyiv Commercial Court of 12 May 2009 which changed the way of execution of the judgment of the same court of 21 April 2009 with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights. The Government undertake to enforce the above decision within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The enforcement of the decision of the Kyiv Commercial Court of 12 May 2009 which changed the way of execution of the judgment of the same court of 21 April 2009 will constitute the final resolution of the case.” On 10 August 2015 the Court received a letter from the applicant’s representative confirming that the applicant company agreed to the conditions of the friendly settlement declaration. THE LAW In the light of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue the examination of the application under Article   37   § 1 in fine . Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.   Done in English and notified in writing on 12 November 2015.   Milan Blaško   Angelika Nußberger Deputy Registrar   PresidentCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 29
- Date
- 20 octobre 2015
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC006340313
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral