CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 17 novembre 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB02EDC95 { width:190.3pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no 54271/13 Redžep KADRIĆ against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17   November 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Helena Jäderblom, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Branko Lubarda, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 August 2013, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Redžep Kadrić, is a Serbian national, who was born in 1965 and lives in Novi Pazar. He was represented before the Court by Mr   E.   Fetahović, a lawyer practising in Novi Pazar. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodić. The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment (Municipal Court in Novi Pazar judgment of 17   April 2004) rendered in his favour against a socially-owned company ( Raška Holding AD ). On 18 November 2014 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above. On 25 March 2015 the Government submitted to the Registry their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application. These were forwarded on 8 April 2015 to the applicant, who was invited to submit observations in reply by 20 May 2015. On 29 June 2015 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant wanted to withdraw the application as the judgment in question had in fact been enforced. THE LAW In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 10 December 2015. Marialena Tsirli   Helena Jäderblom Deputy Registrar   President