CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG26
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 8 décembre 2015
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC005670210
- Date
- 8 décembre 2015
- Publication
- 8 décembre 2015
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s28BDCFEA { width:6.53pt; display:inline-block } .s82B56815 { width:201.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 56702/10 Hasan DENİZ against Turkey and 12 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 8   December 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Paul Lemmens, President,   Ksenija Turković,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, judges, and Abel Campos, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates indicated in the appendix, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They were all represented by Mr Ö. Türkdoğan, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. Relying on Articles 6, 11 and 13 of the Convention, the applicants alleged that they were given a disciplinary penalty for taking part in a demonstration and complained further of a lack of a domestic remedy to challenge the impugned disciplinary measures. On 5 August 2015 and 17 August 2015 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against the respondent State in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay ex gratia to each of them 500 euros (five hundred euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,100 (one thousand one hundred euros) for costs and expenses, which will be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Given that the applications at hand concern the same facts and complaints and raise identical issues under the Convention, the Court decides to join them, pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of the Court. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 7 January 2016.   Abel Campos   Paul Lemmens Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No Application No Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   56702/10 30/07/2010 Hasan DENİZ 01/01/1979 Adana Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   65791/10 15/10/2010 Doğan Ali USLU 08/03/1962 Samsun Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   65795/10 15/10/2010 Orhan KADEMAĞAOĞLU 20/07/1969 Samsun Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   39243/11 16/03/2011 Sevil ESER 31/03/1975 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   39246/11 16/03/2011 Nursel KARATAŞ 03/11/1964 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   40190/11 16/03/2011 İsmet KIRBABA 01/03/1955 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   43206/11 16/03/2011 Fatma KARAKUŞ 02/10/1967 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   43213/11 16/03/2011 Hatice YILMAZ 01/01/1966 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN   43216/11 16/03/2011 Gürbüz ÇETİNKAYA 14/09/1975 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN             43221/11 16/03/2011 Alime EKİZ 03/09/1961 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN             43222/11 16/03/2011 Fatma ERGİN 15/01/1974 Muğla Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN             43223/11 16/03/2011 Nevin GÜRKAN 05/10/1973 Muğla   Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN             43226/11 16/03/2011 Ayşen SARI 01/01/1975 Muğla   Öztürk TÜRKDOĞAN  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 26
- Date
- 8 décembre 2015
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC005670210
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral