CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 janvier 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s219AC2B9 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:21.3pt; text-align:left } .sB4924468 { width:162.32pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sB62BA9AD { width:168.28pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .sCC22C24E { font-family:Arial; color:#3e3e3e } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s42625D7A { height:27.35pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s22D35D7A { height:24.95pt } .s4D85D7A { height:25.35pt } .s239D5D7A { height:24.35pt } .s5395D7A { height:25.45pt } .s5165D7A { height:25.15pt } .s22725D7A { height:24.85pt } .s13BC263B { height:24.5pt } .s24215D7A { height:24.75pt } .sF410263B { height:25.2pt } .sF494263B { height:25.6pt } .s1359263B { height:24.6pt } .s754C1073 { height:25pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 45517/13 Ioan PANDEL against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 28   January 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A. De Gaetano, President,   Egidijus Kūris,   Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”). The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 18 February 2016. Hasan Bakırcı   Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting Deputy Registrar   President List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention ( inadequate conditions of detention ) APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [i]       45517/13 06/07/2013 Ioan PANDEL 04/01/1975 21/05/2015 14/04/2015 5,300     80819/13 13/12/2013 Sándor VIRÁG 15/12/1980 04/08/2015 31/07/2015 3,600     15303/14 13/03/2014 Gheorghe TIPUS 12/03/1962 27/07/2015 16/07/2015 3,600     39603/14 05/09/2014 Paul Bogdan CHITARU 25/09/1976 03/09/2015 07/09/2015 3,600     47606/14 17/07/2014 Ioan Daniel BRUMĂ 31/08/1983 15/09/2015 30/11/2015 3,000     48913/14 22/08/2014 Marius Constantin PISTOLEA 19/03/1980 24/08/2015 31/03/2015 3,600     52127/14 22/09/2014 Emil NIȚĂ 18/07/1958 03/09/2015 03/08/2015 6,450     52364/14 15/09/2014 Florin Remus FIERARU 08/03/1978 04/08/2015 27/05/2015 3,500     52643/14 25/08/2014 Nicolae NEGRU 03/06/1982 14/09/2015 07/09/2015 3,300   54351/14 17/09/2014 Gheorghe IONESCU 07/08/1967 03/09/2015 26/08/2015 3,000   54931/14 13/10/2014 Cristian CĂZILĂ 13/04/1986 02/10/2015 09/09/2015 3,600   54938/14 05/09/2014 Ovidiu Marcel ARDELEAN 16/07/1988 18/09/2015 31/08/2015 4,100   54940/14 05/09/2014 Teofil Codrin SABOU 26/02/1990 23/09/2015 26/08/2015 5,000   68978/14 09/10/2014 Iulică MONEA 15/01/1979 01/10/2015 07/09/2015 11,900   [i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.