CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 15 mars 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sF3B96856 { width:11.87pt; display:inline-block } .s1CC9A90 { width:198.47pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sC1FB798F { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s5A86E1EA { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .s80675C4D { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s3FD242B2 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6105F245 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sA2DB043A { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sDB1825FE { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s328630D4 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s91358068 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s638BD77C { font-family:Arial; font-size:9pt; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD8E76205 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s1A80C619 { height:103.75pt } .s75E70776 { height:52.9pt } .sF1C0E884 { height:82.05pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 70712/13 Adelino Dias SANTOS SARMENTO against Portugal and 9 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   March 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the dates set out in the appendix no. 2, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants are all Portuguese nationals. They were represented before the Court by Mr. Jorge F. Alves, a lawyer practising in Matosinhos. A list of the applicants is set out in appendix no. 2. The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs   M. F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney-General. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings before the Leiria Administrative Court to which they were a party. Under Article 13 they complained about the fact that they had not had an effective remedy with regard to the length of proceedings. On 26 November 2015 and 29 January 2016 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Portugal in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay them the sums set in the appendix no. 2 to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. They will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Given that the present applications concern the same facts and complaints and raise related issues under the Convention, the Court decides to join them pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of the Court. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications , Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 7 April 2016.   Fatoş Aracı   Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX no. 1 List of Applications   1 . 70712/13 Santos Sarmento v. Portugal 1. 75989/13 Pires Serra v. Portugal 2. 77088/13 Curica Calixto v. Portugal 3. 3168/14 Carvalho Aparício v. Portugal 4. 30090/14 Quental Rodrigues Sarmento v. Portugal 5. 30115/14 Valamatos Esteves v. Portugal 6. 30118/14 Lopes de Jesus v. Portugal 7. 30119/14 Rodrigues Teixeira v. Portugal 8. 30122/14 De Oliveira Caldeira de Carvalho Aparício v. Portugal 9. 31553/14 Calado Bernardo Maia Alcaravela and Others v. Portugal APPENDIX no. 2 List of Applicants No. Name of the applicants Application number   Date of birth Place of residence Non-pecuniary damage in euros (EUR) Costs and expenses in euros (EUR) 1.       2. Adelino Dias SANTOS SARMENTO 70712/13 (lodged on 31/10/2013) 29/11/1954 Abrantes   Maria Fernanda QUENTAL RODRIGUES SARMENTO 30090/14 (lodged on 08/04/2014) 06/04/1955 Abrantes EUR 4,875 jointly EUR 1,000 jointly 3       4. Ernesto Manuel PIRES SERRA 75989/13 (22/11/2013) 30/09/1975 Abrantes   Elisabete LOPES DE JESUS 30118/14 (lodged on 08/04/2014) 12/10/1974 Abrantes EUR 4,875 jointly 5.       Mário João CURICA CALIXTO 77088/13 (lodged on 02/12/2013) 18/12/1966 Abrantes   EUR 4,875   6.       7. Luís Augusto CARVALHO APARÍCIO 3168/14 (lodged on 27/12/2013) 03/08/1951 Mação   Maria da Graça DE OLIVEIRA CALDEIRA DE CARVALHO APARÍCIO 30122/14 (lodged on 08/04/2014) 01/03/1953 Abrantes EUR 4,875 jointly 8. Luís Manuel VALAMATOS ESTEVES 30115/14 (lodged on 08/04/2014) 05/12/1954 Abrantes EUR 4,875   9. Maria de Fátima RODRIGUES TEIXEIRA 30119/14 (lodged on 08/04/2014) 23/11/1964 Abrantes EUR 4,875   10. Célia Margarida CALADO BERNARDO MAIA ALCARAVELA 31553/14 (lodged on 11/04/2014) 01/07/1958 Abrantes EUR 4,875   11.       12. Matilde Preciosa FERNANDES DE MATOS 31553/14 (lodged on 11/04/2014) 01/07/1958 Abrantes   Delfim SILVA MATOS 31553/14 (lodged on 11/04/2014) 22/07/1955 Abrantes EUR 4,875 jointly 13. Francisco ROSA FERREIRA 31553/14 (lodged on 11/04/2014) 31/03/1951 Abrantes EUR 4,875   14. Jorge do Carmo PEDRO DOS SANTOS 31553/14 (lodged on 11/04/2014) 19/05/1958 Loures EUR 4,875