CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG28
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 juin 2016
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628DEC000183808
- Date
- 28 juin 2016
- Publication
- 28 juin 2016
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5830ECD9 { width:0.2pt; display:inline-block } .sB57ABB22 { width:160.72pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sDA7B726A { width:116.04%; border-collapse:collapse } .sBF8075AD { width:6.08%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sCF9DCC8B { width:34.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2CC57508 { width:19.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDB3AFDE7 { width:16.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s1D180F61 { width:24.14%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s75E15CA0 { width:6.08%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s55D4A530 { margin-left:15.01pt; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s3D67D9A5 { width:34.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s8A5DD6FD { width:19.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s75635EF1 { width:16.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4043161D { width:24.14%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 1838/08 Teimuraz ZHORZHOLIANI and Others against Georgia (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 28   June 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, President,   Iulia Motoc,   Marko Bošnjak, judges, and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 November 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. All applicants were represented before the Court by Mr G. Nikolaishvili, a lawyer practising in Tbilisi. 2.     The Georgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms S. Mezurnishvili of the Ministry of Justice. 3.     The case mainly concerned the applicants’ extended detention on remand. 4.     On 5 January 2016 the case was communicated to the respondent Government under Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention. 5.     By a letter of 27 April 2016 the Government informed the Court that they proposed a friendly settlement with a view of resolving the issues raised in the application. In their proposal the Government acknowledged that the applicants’ extended detention on remand was not in conformity with the requirements of Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention. The Government further undertook to pay each applicant 2,500 (two thousand and five hundred) euros (EUR) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages as well as costs and expenses, which will be converted into the respondent State’s national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable to the applicants. This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. 6.     By a letter of 13 May 2016, the applicants informed the Court that they were ready to accept the terms of the Government’s friendly settlement proposal, thus agreeing to drop all their claims against the respondent State. THE LAW 7.     The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 21 July 2016.   Andrea Tamietti   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque Deputy Registrar   President Appendix N o Name Date of birth Nationality Place of residence   Teimuraz ZHORZHOLIANI 28/01/1950 Georgian Tbilisi   Zaza DAVITAIA 10/10/1968 Georgian Rustavi   Kakhaber KANTARIA 05/06/1971 Georgian Tbilisi   Giorgi METREVELI 19/06/1968 Georgian Rustavi   Guram PAPUKASHVILI 20/05/1966 Georgian Rustavi   Ramaz SAMNIDZE 23/07/1969 Georgian Rustavi  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
- Formation
- 28
- Date
- 28 juin 2016
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628DEC000183808
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral