CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 28 juin 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .sD79BB263 { width:196.1pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sD0B5C7A1 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s55892762 { height:92.7pt } .s3D6D7C59 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sA05BBA7D { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sD7792762 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sB217F55D { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } .s92483A11 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s84864202 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s87680A70 { margin-left:11.67pt; text-align:center; padding-left:6.18pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s51B126BB { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s1C421C48 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; vertical-align:top } .sC70B94C7 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s8E7A0632 { height:282.05pt } .s9A96B0D3 { height:166.25pt } .sD250F07F { height:94.85pt } .s39399813 { height:108.3pt } .s6F218916 { height:308pt } .s67FEDBA { height:119.05pt } .sE3840776 { margin-left:16.12pt; text-align:center; padding-left:1.73pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s74FF276F { height:112.9pt } .s10764627 { height:67.6pt } .s86FCE089 { height:76.65pt } .sF1F34627 { height:64.4pt } .sE208486F { font-family:Arial; color:#ff0000 } .s271B5584 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt } .sB38D83CF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt } .sD73903ED { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; vertical-align:top } .sA68C4845 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 42107/04 Hasan EROĞLU against Turkey and 20 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 28   June 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Ksenija Turković, President,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,   Georges Ravarani, judges, and, Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.     A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. A.     The circumstances of the cases 2.     The facts of the cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 3.     The applicants’ respective plots of land were expropriated by the administration. Subsequently, pursuant to section 10 of Law   no.   2942 proceedings were initiated before the first instance courts to determine the amount of compensations that should be awarded to the applicants. Based on expert reports, the domestic courts established the amount of compensations and these judgments were subsequently upheld by the Court of Cassation. No interest was applied to the amounts paid. The details of the applications may be found in the appendix. B.     Relevant domestic law and practice 4.     A description of the domestic law regarding the new remedy introduced by Law no. 6384 may be found in Turgut and Others v.   Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013; Demiroğlu v. Turkey (dec.), no.   56125/10, 4 June 2013; and Yıldız and Yanak v. Turkey (dec.), no.   44013/07, 27 May 2014. COMPLAINTS 5.     Relying on Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complained about the financial loss they had suffered as a result of late payment of the expropriation amounts. In this connection, they maintained that no interest had been applied to the amounts awarded by the courts, that the payment had not been made pursuant to Article   46 of the Constitution, and that the authorities had not complied with the three and a half month time-limit in paying the awarded sums. 6.     Some of the applicants also complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the domestic courts had erred in the calculation of the awards. 7.     Furthermore, in some cases, the applicants alleged under Article 8 of the Convention that their right to respect for their home had been breached as a result of the expropriation. THE LAW 8.     Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. A.     Complaint regarding the alleged financial loss suffered by the applicants 9.     Relying on Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complained about the financial loss they had suffered as a result of the late payment of the expropriation amounts. 10.     The Court will examine this part of the application solely under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, Yetiş and Others v.   Turkey , no. 40349/05, § 63, 6 July 2010, and Güleç and Armut v.   Turkey (dec.), no. 25969/09, 16 November 2010). 11.     The Government noted that pursuant to Law no. 6384 a new Compensation Commission had been established to deal with applications concerning the length of proceedings and the non-execution of judgments. They further noted that the competence of the Compensation Commission was subsequently enlarged by a decree adopted on 16 March 2014 to examine complaints relating to, among other things, the alleged loss of value of the amount of the expropriation compensation due to the effects of inflation and the length of the proceedings. Accordingly, they maintained that the applicants had not exhausted domestic remedies, as they had not made any application to the Compensation Commission. 12.     The Court observes that, as pointed out by the Government, a new domestic remedy has been established in Turkey following the application of the pilot judgment procedure in the case of Ümmühan Kaplan v.   Turkey (no.   24240/07, 20 March 2012). Subsequently, in its decision in the case of Yıldız and Yanak v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 44013/07, 27 May 2014), the Court declared an application inadmissible on the ground that the applicants had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, that is to say the new remedy. In so doing, the Court considered in particular that this new remedy was a priori accessible and capable of offering a reasonable prospect of redress for complaints concerning the depreciation of awards in expropriation cases. 13.     The Court notes that in its decision in the case of Ümmühan Kaplan (cited above, § 77), it stressed that it could nevertheless examine, under its normal procedure, applications of that type which had already been communicated to the Government. 14.     However, taking into account the Government’s preliminary objection with regard to the applicants’ failure to make use of the new domestic remedy established by Law no. 6384, the Court reiterates its conclusion in the case of Turgut and others ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26   March 2013). 15.     In view of the above, the Court concludes that this part of the applications should be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non ‑ exhaustion of domestic remedies. B.     Other complaints 16.     The applicants also raised other complaints under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention. However, in the light of the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that these complaints do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 17.     It follows that this part of the applications is manifestly ill ‑ founded and must be rejected in accordance with the Article 35 § 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Declares inadmissible the applications.   Done in English and notified in writing on 21 July 2016.   Hasan Bakırcı   Ksenija Turković Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application No and Date of Introduction Applicant’s Name, date of birth, place of residence and name of representative Date on which the applicant initiated proceedings and plot no.       Information regarding the judgment of the first-instance courts Information regarding the final decision of the Court of Cassation   42107/04 06/09/2004 Hasan Eroğlu 06/01/1944 Niğde   Adil Aktay 29/03/2002   Plot no.   104/386       21/11/2003   Ulukışla Civil Court   (E   :   2003/318, K   :   2003/505)   1   690   749 107 TRL 23/03/2004     (E   :   2004/691, K   :   2004/2241)       42108/04 06/09/2004 Ali Avcu 05/07/1926 Horuz   Adil Aktay 11/03/2002   Plot no.   563 (a)       19/12/2003   Ulukışla Civil Court   (E   : 2003/141, K   :   2003/540)   71   826   921   305 TRL   13/04/2004     (E   :   2004/1619, K   :   2004/3036)       42109/04 06/09/04 Ali Avcu 05/07/1926 Horuz   Adil Aktay 11/03/2002   Plot no.   563     19/12/2003   Ulukışla Civil Court   (E   : 2003/139, K   :   2003/538)   23   290   063   462 TRL   13/04/2004   (E   :   2004/1629, K   :   2004/3037)   44627/09 10/08/2009   Abdullah Ünlü 20/08/1935 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 28/03/2006   Plot no.   147/   3         23/09/2008 Ermenek Civil Court (E   : 2008/40, K   : 2008/274)   33   547,63 TRY   02/03/2009   (E   :   2008/12923, K   :   2009/1886)   45988/09 17/08/2009   Fadime Altunay 25/10/1965 Karaman   Mehmet Gündüz 18/07/1968 Karaman   Hanım Çeyiz 25/02/1972 Konya   Hakkı Altunay 10/05/1954 Karaman   Hasan Altunay 05/04/1935 Karaman   Fatma Altunay 01/01/1929 Karaman   Hasibe Gündüz   01/01/1960 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 28/03/2006   Plot no.   144/   6                             23/09/2008 Ulukışka Civil Court (E   : 2008/29, K   :   2008/264)   38 260,09 TRY     03/03/2009   (E   :   2009/947, K   :   2009/2088)   47356/09 24/08/2009 Mehmet Ali Bakır 19/01/1954   Emine Altunay 01/09/1965   Hasan Ali Bakır 15/10/1947   Fatma Belen 10/05/1952   Ayşe Balcı 20/03/1963 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 28/03/2006   Plot no.   151/   35                 23/09/2008   Ermenek Civil Court (E/2008/87, K/2008/284)   2   298,66 TRY   02/03/2009   (E/2008/12895, K/209/1885)   47412/09 25/08/2009   Fadime Armut 13/11/1972 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 28/03/2006   Plot no.   150/   4         23/09/2008   Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/129, K   : 2008/286)     3   905, 45 TRY     02/03/2009   (E   :   2008/12908, K   :   2009/1884)   47982/09 10/08/2009   Hasan Korkmaz 03/07/1959 Karaman   Adil Aktay 28/03/2006   Plot no.   150/   5     23/09/2008   Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/39, K   :   2008/273)   14   917,71 TRY   02/03/2009     (E   :   2008/1291, K   :   2009/1889)   47987/09 10/08/2009   Ayşe Başcı 12/02/1931 Karaman   İsmail Keşyapan 01/12/1977 Karaman     Serkan Keşyapan 07/02/1982 Karaman   Erdal Keşyapan 01/03/1980 Karaman   Zehra Keşyapan 03/10/1952 Karaman   Mehmet Ali Başçı 06/05/1949 Karaman   Fadime Şimşek 25/06/1959 Karaman   Kamil Başçı 01/02/1962 Karaman   Mehmet Başçı 01/04/1967 Karaman   Şerife Yaldız 07/04/1970 Karaman   Ahmet Başçı 15/01/1955 Karaman   Adil Aktay     28/03/2006   Plot no.   146/   8                 23/09/2008   Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/46, K   :   2008/283)   42   836,91 TRY       02/03/2009   (E   :   2008/12922, K   :   2009/1887)   49789/09 15/08/2009 Özdemir Dede 01/03/1945 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 23/02/2006 Plot no.   101/   17       01/09/2008   Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/26, K   : 2008/241)   28   946,09 TRY   16/03/2009     (E   :   209/1824, K   :   2009/2608)   49799/09 15/08/2009 Teslime Toklu 15/01/1959 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 23/02/2006   Plot no.   101/   10       01/09/2008   Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/25, K   : 2008/240)     13   924,44 TRY   30/03/2009   (E   : 2009/2988, K   :   2009/3408)   53149/09 29/09/2009   Şefika Demir 11/02/1949 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   139/   13     30/12/2008 Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/53, K   : 2008/362)   149   859,09 TRY     30/03/2009   (E   :   2009/2998, K   :   2009/3407)   53152/09 29/09/2009   Hatice Kalkan 01/01/1927 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   140/   4     30/12/2008     Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/58,   K   : 2008/366)     165   735, 40 TRY   30/03/2009   (E   : 2009/2996, K   :   2009/3406)   53691/09 05/10/2009   Mustafa Kalkan 20/08/1945 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   140/   3     30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/57, K   :   2008/365)   45   544,62 TRY   06/04/2009   (E   : 2009/2990, K   :   2009/3772)   53692/09 05/10/2009   Mehmet Başçı 03/03/1955 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   139/   31       30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/56,   K   : 2008/364)     233   995,97 TRY     06/04/2009   (E   : 2009/2997, K   :   2009/3775)   53694/09 05/10/2009   Mehmet Başçı 01/04/1967 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   139/   5       30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/132, K   :   2008/370)   71   449,34 TRY   (paid on 30/12/2008)   06/04/2009   (E   :   2009/2992, K   :   2009/3770)   53698/09 05/10/2009   Osman Tuna 20/03/1951 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   151/   37       30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/59, K   :   2008/367)   76   827,50 TRY (paid on 31/12/2008)   06/04/2009     (E   :   2009/2999, K   :   2009/3771)   54814/09 05/10/2009   Emine Altunay 01/01/1938 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız   09/10/2006   Plot no.   151/   33       30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/60, K   :   2008/368)     208   562,67 TRY (paid on 31/12/2008)   06/04/2009   (E   :   2009/2995, K   :   2009/3773)   54842/09 05/10/2009   Mustafa Kalkan 20/08/1945 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   139/   12         30/12/2008     Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/52, K   : 2008/361)   180   864,63 TRY (paid on 30/12/2008)   06/04/2009   (E   : 2009/2991, K   :   2009/3774)   56460/09 12/10/2009   Asiye Yeşilyaprak 10/11/1957 Karaman   Emine Dağ 15/07/1966 Ermenek   Salahaddin Şimşek 15/10/1968 Karaman   Erol Şimşek 25/07/1972 Karaman   Ali Şimşek 04/08/1960 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   128/   1               30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court   (E   : 2008/50, K   : 2008/360)     446   268,96 TRY   (paid on 30/12/2008) 13/04/2009   (E   :   2009/2989, K   :   2009/4075)   56478/09 12/10/2009   Mehmet Başçı 03/03/1955 Karaman   Özlem Yıldız 09/10/2006   Plot no.   139/   30       30/12/2008   Ermenek Civil Court     (E   : 2008/55, K   :   2008/363)   846   795, 26 TRY   (paid on 30/12/2008)   13/04/2009     (E   :   2009/3000, K   :   2009/4076)