CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG — 30 juin 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s2EF17D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s4B243ECC { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F897A7E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7E985A65 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; font-size:1pt } .sF7A4323 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s5362FFEB { width:4.87pt; display:inline-block } .s46C79669 { width:202.1pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7FDD75C9 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:-0.2pt; color:#474747 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC39F4804 { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2C094500 { height:31.4pt } .s39D56575 { height:37.05pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 24357/10 Eyvaz SOLTANOV against Azerbaijan and 8 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 30 June 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni, President,   Faris Vehabović,   Khanlar Hajiyev, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The list of applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table. The applicants’ complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the non ‑ enforcement of domestic decisions were communicated to the Government. The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Azerbaijan in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The Government also undertake to ensure the enforcement of the domestic decisions under consideration in the cases concerned (see appended table) within the same three-month period, and to pay any costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. The payment and the enforcement of the domestic decisions in the cases concerned will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.   Done in English and notified in writing on 21 July 2016.   Hasan Bakırcı   Carlo Ranzoni Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative name and location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant / household (in euros) [i] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [ii]     24357/10 14/04/2010 Eyvaz SOLTANOV 25/12/1967 Amila ORUJOVA Baku Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 10/02/2016 3,600 500     36844/10 21/06/2010 Arzuman MEHDIYEV 18/07/1957     Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 25/01/2016 3,600       56514/10 20/09/2010 Sarvar NAZAROV 21/01/1969 Sahil GULIYEV Baku Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 03/11/2015 3,600 500     10528/11 01/02/2011 Gulnaz SALMANOVA 27/12/1960 Mukhtar MUSTAFAYEV Baku Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 27/04/2016 03/11/2015 3,600 500     20631/13 27/02/2013 Arif RUSTAMOV 25/07/1951 Annagi HAJIBEYLI Baku Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 06/01/2016 1,800 500     71844/13 22/10/2013 Mammadkhan TEYMUROV 22/06/1957 Ruslan MUSTAFAZADE Sumgayit Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 25/01/2016 3,600 500     23680/14 12/03/2014 Beydulla ASLANOV 01/12/1949 Agil LAYIJOV Baku Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 13/11/2015 3,600       78696/14 09/12/2014 Sarkar HUSEYNOV 12/11/1954 Ruslan MUSTAFAZADE Sumgayit Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 25/01/2016 2,500 500     5394/15 16/01/2015 Anar GANIYEV 31/05/1981 Ruslan MUSTAFAZADE Sumgayit Prot. 1 Art. 1 - Non-enforcement of judgment 26/01/2016 25/01/2016 3,600 500   [i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants. [ii] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.